Canada: Here One Minute, Gone The Next: BC Court Of Appeal Overturns Chambers Judge's Decision To Grant Leave To Appeal An Arbitral Award In Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited

Last Updated: December 20 2018
Article by Kate Stephens

In its recent decision in Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, the British Columbia Court of Appeal emphasized the strict limits on the availability of appeal for arbitral awards.i Arbitral awards are difficult to appeal and for good reason: one of the principal benefits of arbitration is that the parties involved can avoid the costs, time, and multiple appearances associated with litigating before the courts. Arbitration is, after all, intended to be an alternative means of resolving legal disputes.


Richmont v. Teck is an appeal of an order granting the Respondent, Richmont Mines Inc. ("Richmont"), leave to appeal an arbitral award made in favour of the Appellant, Teck Resources Limited ("Teck"). The arbitral award concerned four patented mineral claims on two parcels of land for which Richmont was a successor in interest, and Teck was a successor in interest as to a 2% royalty. The central question was whether or not Teck's 2% royalty extended over 100% or 69% of the gold produced from the mineral claims, based on an interpretation of the word "Property" in the agreement. The arbitrator ultimately sided with Teck in finding that the royalty extended over 100% of the gold produced.

Following the arbitral award, Richmont applied for leave to appeal under section 31 of British Columbia's Arbitration Act (the "Act"), which provides:

  1. A party to an arbitration, other than an arbitration in respect of a family law dispute, may appeal to the court on any question of law arising out of the award if

    1. all of the parties to the arbitration consent, or
    2. the court grants leave to appeal.
  2. In an application for leave under subsection (1)(b), the court may grant leave if it determines that

    1. the importance of the result of the arbitration to the parties justifies the intervention of the court and the determination of the point of law may prevent a miscarriage of justice,
    2. the point of law is of importance to some class or body of persons of which the applicant is a member, or
    3. the point of law is of general or public importance. ii

Ontario's Arbitration Act, 1991, contains a similar provision addressing leave to appeal of arbitral awards at section 45:

  1. If the arbitration agreement does not deal with appeals on questions of law, a party may appeal an award to the court on a question of law with leave, which the court shall grant only if it is satisfied that,

    1. the importance to the parties of the matters at stake in the arbitration justifies an appeal; and
    2. determination of the question of law at issue will significantly affect the rights of the parties. iii

The basis of Richmont's application for leave to appeal was that the arbitrator erred in law in his interpretation of the word "Property" in the agreement by ignoring evidence and failing to interpret the words defining "Property" based on their plain and ordinary meaning and in the context of the agreement as a whole. The Chambers Judge agreed with Richmont that the arbitrator had erred in law, and specifically found that the arbitrator had interpreted the agreement incorrectly. The Chambers Judge also determined that the appeal had merit under subsection 31(2)(a) of the Act, finding that it may prevent a miscarriage of justice.

Teck, in turn, appealed the decision granting leave to appeal on the basis that the Chambers Judge erred in law by, among other things, identifying an error in law where none existed and substituting his own findings for those of the arbitrator. The Court of Appeal agreed, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Chambers Judge's order granting leave to appeal.

Legal Framework

The two leading cases from the Supreme Court detailing the analytical framework applicable to appeal of arbitral awards under the Act are Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.iv and Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia.v The framework articulated in Sattva and refined in Teal emphasizes the narrow jurisdiction of the courts to grant leave to appeal of arbitral awards on questions of law alone, and that there is no jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal on findings of fact or of mixed fact and law, even where those findings may be wrong.

The Supreme Court in Sattva confirmed that contractual interpretation cases generally give rise to questions of mixed fact and The Court also emphasized the need for careful review of the proposed grounds of appeal, given that the party seeking leave to appeal has an obvious interest in characterizing – or mischaracterising – mixed questions of fact and law as extricable questions of law in order to shoehorn them into the narrow jurisdiction for appeal.vii

Finally, in the limited circumstances where an extricable question of law is identified, arbitral awards will "almost always" attract a reasonableness standard of review in light of the policy considerations of efficiency and finality underlying arbitral awards.viii


The Court of Appeal concluded, based on a correctness standard of review, that the Chambers Judge erred in law by not applying the framework articulated in Sattva and Teal. The only question before the Chambers Judge was whether or not Richmont identified an extricable question of law in the arbitrator's award that met the merit considerations under section 31(2) of the Act. Instead, the Chambers Judge focused on the issue of whether or not the interpretation of the relevant provisions by the arbitrator was substantively correct, found that they were not, and in turn, concluded that an extricable question of law existed.ix

The Court of Appeal then engaged in its own analysis of the merits of Richmont's application for leave to appeal. The Court identified "precedential value" as a distinguishing factor between questions of mixed fact and law and questions of law in the post-Sattva jurisprudence.x Essentially, on appellate review of arbitral awards, the question must have precedential value beyond the specific facts of a given case in order to truly be an extricable question of law. The Court concluded that this was not the case in Richmont v. Teck, as the issues identified by Richmont in its application for leave to appeal were dependent on the specific facts of the case relating to, among other things, ownership of land and predecessors and successors in interest.

The Court also held that a further distinguishing factor between questions of mixed fact and law and questions of law is whether the initial decision maker – in this case, the arbitrator – considered the appropriate legal test, stating that "[s]o long as the decision maker applied the appropriate test, the resulting decision can give rise only to a question of mixed fact and law." xi The Court concluded that the arbitrator turned his mind to the correct test, including the factual matrix of the agreement, the relevant words of the agreement, and the overarching requirement that his decision accord with "sound commercial principles and good business sense".xii

Based on this analysis, the Court of Appeal held that Richmont's proposed grounds for appeal, at best, raised only questions of mixed fact and law, and accordingly, allowed the appeal and set aside the order granting leave to appeal. In so doing, the Court emphasized the need for judicial restraint in the commercial arbitration context, in order to preserve the efficiency and finality of the process as an alternative to litigation.xiii


[i] 2018 BCCA 452 [Richmont v. Teck].

[ii] RSBC 1996, c 55, s 31 [the Act].

[iii] SO 1991, c 17, s 45(1).

[iv] 2014 SCC 53 [Sattva].

[v] 2017 SCC 32 [Teal].

[vi] Sattva, at para. 50.

[vii] Ibid. at para. 53.

[viii] Richmont v. Teck, at para. 15, citing Teal, at para. 1.

[ix] Richmont v. Teck, at para. 61.

[x] Ibid. at para. 67.

[xi] Ibid. at para. 69.

[xii] Ibid. at para. 71.

[xiii] Richmont v. Teck, at paras. 79-80.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2019, Other, Toronto, Canada

WeirFoulds is proud to support the SickKids Foundation’s GetLoud corporate challenge once again in 2019. Partners Krista Chaytor and Michael Swartz, along with other team members, will participate in the walk on September 28.

6 Oct 2019, Other, Toronto, Canada

The Women’s Brain Health Initiative will host its annual “From Her Lips to Our Ears” conversation and cocktail event on October 6, 2019.

28 Oct 2019, Conference, Toronto, Canada

The Canadian Network of Agencies for Regulation (CNAR) conference, which will be held on October 28 to 30, will bring together delegates from across the country to discuss challenges and share ideas and best practices related to a wide range of issues relevant to organizations engaged in the self-regulation of professions and occupations.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions