Cayman Islands: Take Privates In Asia By Way Of Cayman Statutory Merger

The general trend of Chinese businesses decoupling from the Nasdaq Stock Market (NASDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE) over recent years has seen a parallel movement in the Hong Kong market with the recent privatisations of Hong Kong-listed companies incorporated in the Cayman Islands, such as Nirvana Asia Ltd, Chinalco Mining Corporation International and Belle International Holdings Limited.

The purposes of these privatisations are manifold and have included a desire for reduced public scrutiny, reduced compliance costs, additional corporate governance flexibility and the prospect of a relisting.

Whilst listed companies in the United States and the United Kingdom have increasingly utilised the statutory merger procedure available for take-private transactions under the Cayman Companies Law (as amended) (the Law) for this decoupling process, eligible companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE) have traditionally used a scheme of arrangement in order to implement such privatisations, as in the three examples listed above. Companies, investors and practitioners alike await an opportunity to utilise a Cayman statutory merger for the privatisation of Hong Kong-listed companies, historically challenging due to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission's interpretation of the Hong Kong Takeovers Code which primarily affords fair treatment for shareholders who are affected by change of control transactions.

This article seeks to outline the process of a Cayman statutory merger and consider the advantages and disadvantages of using this as a mechanism for effecting take-privates in Asia, and also explores the right of dissenting shareholders to obtain fair value for their shares.


A Cayman statutory merger is the process by which two or more companies (each, a constituent company) merge into one of the constituent companies (the surviving company) and the legal existence of each constituent company other than the surviving company ceases. The Law defines a merger as "the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company." As such, the legal effect of a merger is that the surviving company assumes all of the undertakings, property, assets, rights obligations and liabilities of every non-surviving entity. Although perhaps not a use intended by the legislature, the statutory merger process is commonly now the preferred route by which a take private transaction is effected (including by way of a management led buyout) by Chinese businesses operating through a Cayman Islands company whose shares are listed on one of the aforementioned exchanges.


The Law allows two or more companies (comprising at least one Cayman company limited by shares, not being a segregated portfolio company) to merge quickly and simply. Companies and investors intending to use a statutory merger to take a listed company private (usually comprising a combination of the founders or managers of the listed company, its parent and potentially private equity investors) will as an initial step typically form a new company in the Cayman Islands which can be used as the offeror vehicle, recipient of finance and ultimately merger with the target company. In order to implement a statutory merger, the following steps must be taken:

(i) The directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger, which includes certain specific information regarding each constituent company and the terms of the merger (the Plan of Merger).

(ii) The Plan of Merger must be approved by:

  • a special resolution of members of each constituent company, being at least a two-thirds majority of shareholders who have the right to receive notice of, attend and vote at the general shareholders' meeting, voting as one class; and
  • such other authorisation, if any, specified in the con­stituent company's articles of association. The Plan of Merger can be pre-cleared with the Registrar.

(iii) The consent of each holder of fixed or floating security interests of a constituent company must be obtained.

(iv) The Plan of Merger (accompanied by other specified docu­mentation as set out below) must then be filed with the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies (the Registrar) for approval and upon payment of the applicable fee and assuming that the Reg­istrar is satisfied that the requirements of the Law (including any change in name of the surviving company) relating to the merger have been met, the Registrar will:

  • Register the plan of merger and any amendment to the memorandum or articles of association of the surviving company;
  • Issue a certificate of merger within 24 to 48 hours, on an express filing basis, or, around five working days on a normal filing basis; and
  • Strike-off each constituent company other than the surviving company once the merger becomes effective.

(v) The merger is effective on either: (a) the date the Plan of Merger is registered by the Registrar (the Registration Date); or (b) such date or the occurrence of an event subsequent to the Registration Date as specified in the Plan of Merger (which must not be more than 90 days after the Registration Date).

Subject to certain limitations, a shareholder of a constituent Cayman company who dissents from a merger is entitled to be paid the fair value for his shares. A shareholder who intends to exercise his right to be paid fair value must provide the constituent company with a written objection to the merger before the other shareholders vote on the merger.


The documents needed to carry out a merger are listed below.

(i) Plan of merger: The content of the Plan of Merger is prescribed by the Law and comprises the following information:

a. the name of each constituent company and the surviving company;

b. the registered office of each constituent company;

c. for each constituent company, the designation and number of each class of shares;

d. the date which it is intended that the merger take effect;

e. the terms and conditions of the proposed merger including, the manner and basis of converting shares in each constituent company into shares in the surviving company or into other property (consisting of shares, debt obligations or other securities in the surviving company or a combination of these);

f. the rights and restrictions attaching to shares in the surviving company;

g. any proposed amendments to the memorandum or articles of association of the surviving company or, if none are proposed, a statement that the memorandum of association and articles of association of the surviving company immediately prior to merger shall be its memorandum and articles of association after the merger;

h. any amount or benefit paid or payable to any director of a constituent or surviving company consequent upon the merger;

i. the name and address of any secured creditor of a constituent company and the nature of the secured interest held; and

j. the names and addresses of the directors of the surviving company.

(ii) Accompanying documents: The following documents are required to be filed with the Plan of Merger:

a. a certificate of good standing of each constituent company;

b. a written director's declaration of each constituent company (signed by and including the full name and address of the director making the declaration); i. that the constituent company is, and the surviving company will be, immediately after the merger, able to pay its debts as they fall due;

ii. that the merger is bona fide and not intended to defraud unsecured creditors of the constituent companies;

iii. that no petition or other similar proceeding has been filed and remains outstanding, and that no order has been made or resolution adopted to wind up that constituent company in any jurisdiction;

iv. that no receiver, trustee, administrator or other similar person has been appointed in any jurisdiction and is acting in respect of that constituent company or all or any part of its affairs or its property;

v. that no scheme, order, compromise or other similar arrangement has been entered into or made in any jurisdiction whereby the rights of creditors of that constituent company are, and continue to be, suspended or restricted;

vi. of the assets and liabilities of the constituent company made up to the latest practicable date before the making of the declaration;

vii. in the case of a constituent company that is not the surviving company, that that constituent company has retired from any fiduciary office held or will do so immediately prior to the merger; and

viii. where relevant, that the constituent company has complied with any applicable requirements under all Cayman Islands regulatory laws; and

c. an undertaking by each constituent company that a copy of the certificate of merger will be given to the members and creditors of that constituent company and that notification of the merger will be published in the Cayman Islands Gazette.


The statutory merger process provides a straightforward and relatively inexpensive mechanism by which two or more companies can merge, with all rights and property of each of the merging companies vesting in a surviving company that also assumes all of their obligations. This can also involve a capital reorganisation so that some or all of the shares (of the same or different classes) may be converted into, or exchanged for, different types of property (such as shares, debt obligations or other securities in the surviving company or any other corporate entity or money or other property, or a combination of these). The fact that only one of the merging companies has to be incorporated in the Cayman Islands (provided that the overseas constituent company's jurisdiction permits the merger) provides flexibility of deal structure given that the process of establishing a Cayman Islands limited company is simple and efficient.

In contrast to typical schemes of arrangement or general offers used for the privatisation of HKSE-listed companies, companies or investors wishing to acquire 100% control of a target company incorporated in the Cayman Islands by way of statutory merger enjoy a lower shareholder approval threshold, being a two-thirds majority compared to the majority in 4 number of shareholders who vote (the headcount test) that collectively represent at least three-fourths of the value of the shares voted in the case of a scheme and the 90% acceptances required for a 'squeeze-out' in the case of a general offer.

In addition, a statutory merger entitles all shareholders to vote on the proposed transaction, including a controlling shareholder who is proposing to acquire overall control of the target, typically excluded from a vote to approve a scheme or discounted from the 'disinterested' acceptances required to effect a squeeze-out following a general offer.

Perhaps most significantly, a statutory merger does not involve a court process which forms an integral part of a scheme of arrangement and therefore a statutory merger benefits from substantial time and cost savings.

The statutory merger also avoids the need to grapple with the uncertainty and practical difficulties which have historically plagued the approval process for schemes of arrangement owing to the fact that the majority of shareholders of listed companies hold shares through a nominee (such as the HKSCC Nominees Limited for Hong Kong-listed companies).


The potential disadvantage of using a statutory merger over a scheme of arrangement is the ability of any dissenting minorities to object to the merger and demand the fair value of their shares where they believe that this ought to be more than what was offered to them. This is a right afforded to shareholders of a Cayman company at Law although it is worth noting that their dissent does not affect the merger taking effect. As such, this is effectively a separate process which runs post-merger which is examined in further detail below.

For companies or investors evaluating the cost-benefit of a privatisation, the possibility of dissenting shareholders can be a significant concern where the success of even one or two dissenting shareholders can impact the financial viability of the deal. In contrast, a scheme of arrangement, once sanctioned and approved by the Cayman court, binds all shareholders (including any dissenting minority) and therefore provides the offeror with certainty.


Shareholders of Cayman companies which have voted to merge are entitled, pursuant to section 238 of the Law, to dissent from the merger and receive payment of the fair value for their shares. Whilst such dissenting member will not necessarily impact on the timing and effect of a merger, it is prudent to identify dissenting members as early as possible as this may impact on the economics of the merger.

Fair value is determined by agreement of the parties. Where parties are not able to agree the value to be attributed to the shares, within a certain prescribed timeframe, either party may petition the court for a determination of the fair value of the company's shares. The right to dissent under the Law is restricted and will not apply to members who receive in exchange for their shares:

(i) shares of a surviving company (or depositary receipts in respect thereof);

(ii) shares of any other company (or depositary receipt in respect thereof) that are either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on a recognised interdealer quotation system or held of record by more than two thousand holders; or

(iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts as described above. Upon giving formal notice of dissent, in accordance with the procedure set out under the Law, a dissenting shareholder shall cease to have any of the rights of a member except the right to be paid fair value, the right to petition the court where an agreement as to fair value cannot be reached, and the right to institute proceedings to obtain relief on the ground that the merger is void or unlawful.

In line with the increasing use of statutory mergers as the favoured mechanism for take-privates, claims by dissenting shareholders demanding fair value for their shares are no longer a rarity as they were two years ago when the landmark ruling of Integra in 2015 made headlines for its important guidance on how the 'fair value' of a dissenting shareholder's shares is to be determined.

Indeed, there now exists a rapidly evolving area of jurisprudence in the Cayman Islands concerning the dissent process, and the rights afforded to shareholders who seek the payment of fair value for their shares. Given the continued use of the statutory merger process by Chinese (and other) business to effect a take-private transactions, and the perception among some investors that those transactions are being undertaken at prices which are undervalue, it is expected that this body of case law will continue to expand.


Shaun Folpp is a Partner at Mourant Ozannes, Hong Kong, and head of its Litigation and Restructuring & Insolvency practices in Asia. Prior to relocating to Hong Kong in 2015, Shaun spent almost a decade practising in the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands. Shaun has extensive experience acting both for and against insolvency practitioners in all forms of external administrations, as well as acting for parties involved in general commercial, financial services and trust disputes. He also has considerable experience advising on corporate governance matters, including in relation to directors' duties. He is consistently ranked as a leading lawyer by all of the leading legal journals.

Jessica Lee is a Senior Associate in Mourant Ozannes' Hong Kong finance & corporate practice. Jessica trained with and previously worked as an associate at Linklaters. She was also seconded to the in-house legal team of a UK financial institution as well as a British insurance company. Jessica's experience includes advising various local and multinational companies on cross-border corporate law transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, financings, corporate restructurings, general corporate advisory and pro bono matters.

Christopher Harlowe, is a Partner at Mourant Ozannes. He joined the firm in 2014. He previously worked at Speechly Bircham, where he was a Partner and head of the Corporate Recovery and Insolvency group in London. Christopher is a recognised expert in contentious and non-contentious insolvency, restructuring and recovery work.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions