Understanding Streaming Agreements And Royalty Agreements: Alternatives To Traditional Financing

E|
EKB | Edwards, Kenny & Bray LLP

Contributor

EKB is a full-service law firm dedicated to providing businesses with legal services that are both practical and creative. Located in Vancouver, EKB is on a mission to advance the cause of business leaders.
This paper discusses royalty agreements in general and, in particular, unit, gross overriding, net smelter return and net profits interest royalties
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law

Originally published on October 30, 2017

This paper discusses royalty agreements in general and, in particular, unit, gross overriding, net smelter return and net profits interest royalties.

Some common royalty provisions are introduced – "taking in kind", advance royalties, minimum royalties, capped royalties, buyback rights, and hedging.  The paper goes on to discuss the structure and purpose of streaming agreements, which are usually more robust commercial agreements than royalty agreements.  Provisions that may be found in both royalty and streaming agreements are also discussed, specifically, security, periodic reporting and site visits, operator control over decisions, commingling and unitization, confidentiality, rights of first refusal, the obligation to bind transferees to the agreement,  and dispute resolution.

This paper was originally published in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Journal [Vo. 51, No. 1, 2014 at p. 1]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More