On June 29, 2017, the day its pretrial disclosures were due, Opposer Kid-Systeme filed a motion to reopen its time to file a motion for summary judgment. Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1), as amended in January 2017, provides that a summary judgment motion must be filed "prior to the deadline for pretrial disclosures, as originally set or reset." The Board noted that "prior to" means the day before the deadline. Opposer missed the deadline. Would the Board reopen? Not to worry! Because opposer's motion was filed during the period of transition to the amended Rules, and because the Board clarified Rule 2.127(e)(1) in a July 21, 2017 notice issued after opposer's filing, the Board chose to consider the summary judgment motion and to treat the motion to reopen as moot. http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/ttabvue-91229946-OPP-13.pdfKID-Systeme GmbH v. Türk Hava Yollari Teknik Anonim Sirket, Opposition No. 91229946 (January 12, 2018) [precedential].
Before January 14, 2017, the deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment was "prior to the commencement of the first testimony period, as originally set or as reset." In January 2017, that was changed to "prior to the deadline for pretrial disclosures, as originally set or reset." The Board's July 21, 2017 clarification of Rule 2.127(e)(1) merely changed the words "prior to the deadline" to "before the day of the deadline." In any event, the Board looked kindly on applicant and its predicament, pointing to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of April 4, 2016, which states:
The Board therefore declared opposer's motion to reopen as moot, and it allowed applicant thirty days to respond to the motion for summary judgment.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
