Australia: It is time to re-think workplace right of entry laws

Last Updated: 23 June 2017
Article by James Mattson

"In a liberal democracy, it is assumed that citizens, corporations and other organisations will comply with the law", an exasperated Full Federal Court recently commented.[1] Perhaps those remarks were conscious of the ACTU Secretary declaring, "when [the law is] unjust, I don't think there's a problem with breaking it". The Full Court's retort to such a sentiment was that "compliance is not a matter of choice".

Yet compliance (or avoidance) seems to be optional for (some) unions when it comes to right of entry laws. The laws also allow for some "considerable uncertainty".[2]

In our view, such attitudes and recent decisions demonstrate that the right of entry provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) require a serious re-think and modernisation. A modern system requires laws focussed on professionalism by all participants.

Right of entry laws

An employer has the right to conduct business "free from harassment". [3] Part 3-4 of the FW Act encroaches on that liberty by establishing a framework for certain officials of unions to enter business premises for three discrete and important purposes: to have discussions with workers, to investigate suspected contraventions of the FW Act and for WHS purposes.

To enter premises for those purposes, the official first must have been issued with an entry permit by the Fair Work Commission. To enter premises for WHS purposes, the official must also have a State or Territory WHS entry permit.

Recognising the right of employers to go about their business without undue inconvenience, the FW Act requires permit holders, amongst other things, to give notice of any entry and to produce their permit on request. The permit holder must not hinder or obstruct an employer, or act in an improper manner, when "exercising ... rights in accordance with" Part 3-4 of the FW Act.

Employers too need to respond appropriately to a lawful entry by a permit holder. It is an offence to delay entry and to hinder or obstruct a permit holder performing their statutory functions.

A contemptuous disregard for the framework

On a cold winter's morning, two Queensland union officials (with Federal right of entry permits) stormed onto a building site in NSW. "This site is shut" and "we're stopping the [concrete] pour, this is unsafe" they yelled to workers. Work stopped. The builder asked "what's your name?" "Steve Irwin", the self-described "smart-arse" official said. The builder requested to see their entry permits, but they refused to provide their permits for inspection. There was doubt that any safety concerns were genuinely held. [4]

Fortunately for these officials, they did not have a NSW WHS entry permit. So despite holding Federal entry permits, and purporting to exercise a right of entry for WHS purposes, the Full Federal Court held they fell outside of the regulation of the FW Act as they could not be "exercising ... rights in accordance with" Part 3-4 of the FW Act. [5] In other words, entering the site and engaging in improper conduct is no breach of the Act unless the official is a permit holder and exercising the right of entry as permitted by legislation.

The practical effect of that decision is that officials or permit holders, without WHS permits, can enter sites for a WHS purpose and be untouchable under the FW Act. Employers will need to call the State regulator, the police or take action for trespass. Due to the poor drafting of the FW Act, there is simply no sanction for permit holders engaging in poor behaviour if they did not, or choose not to, engage the FW Act.

Using industrial muscle to enter workplaces

Recognising the apparent gap, the CFMEU appealed another decision finding its officials (and Federal permit holders) breached right of entry laws, advancing new arguments on appeal. The union argued (hold onto your seat):

  • as it did not give written notice of its entry, it had not engaged with the FW Act (and therefore it was outside the regulation of the FW Act); and
  • that it entered the site relying on its "industrial power" and "industrial muscle" as the CFMEU (and not in the exercise of any "rights" under the FW Act).

In effect, the union was using its non-compliance with the FW Act as a shield – a bit like saying I've not relying on my driving licence so you can't book me for speeding! "Such a submission ... is astounding", the Full Federal Court said. [6] The argument was a complete "shunning ... of any need to comply with the" FW Act. [7] The Court did not grant permission for the union to advance this argument on appeal.

"I don't need a permit"

In another recent case, a union official was asked to assist a health and safety representative (HSR) in dealing with a safety issue on site. When he entered the site, and was asked to show his permit, he said he did not need a permit. He also did not hold a federal entry permit.

The FW Act says an official of a union cannot exercise a State WHS right unless they are a federal permit holder. The Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 provides that employers must allow a person assisting a HSR access to the workplace. The union argued that attending a site in this capacity was not exercising a right of entry under the FW Act.

The critical issue was whether the official was exercising a right of entry. "The legislation needs to work in a practical way at the work site", the Full Federal Court said. [8] The Court concluded in entering the site to assist the HSR, the official was exercising a right to enter the premises. As such, the FW Act required him, as an official, to have a permit. "Common sense" needs to be applied the Court said. [9]

Time to re-do right of entry laws

There is no doubt that right of entry laws need "to work in a practical way". As presently drafted, the laws frankly cannot achieve that purpose. The overlay with WHS laws adds further complication.

A scheme that talks of "right" of entry also begins on the wrong premise. As the Full Federal Court recognised, the FW Act grants "privileges and responsibilities". [10] A "right" allows and fosters tempestuous behaviour whereas the language of "privileges and responsibilities" engenders respect and professionalism.

To achieve respect and professionalism, any scheme must:

  • establish a Code of Conduct that applies to officials and employers; and
  • have increased penalties for non-compliance.

The Code of Conduct ought to attach to officials whether they enter premises under invitation or not, and whether they are exercising functions under an entry permit. The Code can regulate a range of behaviour that shows respect for all participants at the work site.

The Code would seek to normalise the behaviour you would expect from an official. Like employers are required to give employees the Fair Work Information Statement, officials should be required to give employers a prescribed form setting out each party's rights and obligations. At least that way, everyone knows and is reminded of their obligations at the time of entry.

If an official then complies with the Code, an employer preventing the proper exercise of any statutory functions, or hindering and obstructing the official in exercising those functions, should face higher penalties. As would an official who decides to misbehave.

Penalties imposed on officials for non-compliances should also be payable by them personally (without reimbursement by the union). A penalty should be a penalty not just a routine cost of the exercise of industrial power or industrial muscle. This issue is presently before the High Court. [11]

In our view, the time for a more modern scheme regulating entry to workplaces has arrived.


1 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v CFMEU [2017] FCAFC 53 (the Perth International Airport case) at [100].

2 Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Bragdon [2015] FCA 668 at [64] to [65] (the Bragdon case).

3 Darlaston v Parker [2010] FCA 771 at [37] to [38] and [44].

4 Bragdon at [15], [39], [47] and [71].

5 Bragdon v Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2016] FCAFC 64.

6 CFMEU v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2017] FCAFC 77 at [37].

8 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Powell [2017] FCAFC 89 at [15].

9 At [57].

10 The Perth International Airport case at [98].

11 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor, M65/2017

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions