United States: Supreme Court's Decision In TC Heartland Narrows Patent Venue Selection

Last Updated: May 31 2017
Article by Nadia C. Arid and Jeffrey M. Fisher

The Supreme Court issued an 8-0 decision in the case of TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, unanimously limiting venue selection in patent infringement cases.  As many had predicted, the Court reversed a 1990 Federal Circuit decision in VE Holding that had expanded patent venue to any judicial district in which the corporation "is incorporated or licensed to do business or is doing business."

The Supreme Court's decision in TC Heartland will undoubtedly have a substantial impact on patent venue selection and will likely lead to a marked decrease in cases brought in the Eastern District of Texas.  Under the Supreme Court's view of patent venue in TC Heartland, simply selling or distributing products in a judicial district would no longer be considered sufficient to hale a defendant into court in that district unless the defendant corporation also has a "regular and permanent" presence in the district. 

TC Heartland (2017): Analyzing the Supreme Court's 8-0 Decision

Strict Reliance on Supreme Court Precedent in Fourco: In arriving at its decision, the Supreme Court relied on its previous precedent in Fourco.  In the 1956 Fourco decision, the Court had reaffirmed a 1942 decision in Stonite, which unequivocally held that 1400(b) was "the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions, and... is not to be supplemented by... §1391."  Today's TC Heartland decision reaffirmed both prior decisions and held that there was no "material difference between the two phrasings" in the version of §1391 that existed at the time of the Fourco decision and the version that exists now.  If anything, the Court found that the argument for reading §1391 into §1400 was "even weaker now than it was when the Court rejected it in Fourco" because the current version of §1391 contains a savings clause, "which expressly states that the provision does not apply when 'otherwise provided by law,' thus making explicit the qualification that the Fourco Court found implicit in the statute."

Application of the Clear Statement Rule: The crux of the Supreme Court's decision dealt with the question of whether Congress's amendment to §1391 changed the meaning of §1400, which has never been amended since its codification in 1948.  On that question, Congress ultimately applied the clear statement rule and found that the "current version of §1391 does not contain any indication that Congress intended to alter the meaning of §1400(b) as interpreted in Fourco."

No Discussion of Current Patent Venue Trends: Nearly every single amicus brief that was submitted to the Court in this case focused on the recent rise in patent forum-shopping trends and the disproportionate number of patent cases being brought in the patentholder-friendly Eastern District of Texas.  Yet, the Supreme Court's decision notably left out any discussion of the Eastern District of Texas or the practical impact of its opinion, and instead simply focused on the jurisprudential considerations.

What Does This Mean for Patent Litigation? The Practical Effects of TC Heartland

A "New" Test for Patent Venue: The relevant test now for choosing patent venue is (a) whether the corporation resides in that district, which now "refers only to the State of incorporation" or (b) whether the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business."  The second prong had been all but meaningless under the Federal Circuit's prior expansive view of the term "reside" in the patent venue statute, but now it could become a significant consideration in cases where a plaintiff does not wish to sue in the defendant's state of incorporation. Case law on this prong shows that no fixed physical presence is required to have a "regular and established place of business" but that the inquiry is "whether the corporate defendant does its business in that district through a permanent and continuous presence there." (In re Cordis Corp., 769 F.2d 733 (Fed. Cir. 1985)).   The TC Heartland decision will likely raise questions over the contours of this requirement, but in the meantime, corporations should consider removing "permanent and continuous" presences from jurisdictions in which they may want to avoid litigation.

Forum Selection: This decision will mostly likely lead to a significant decrease in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas. The Federal Circuit's decision in VE Holding expanding patent venue has been linked to an increase in forum-shopping in patent cases. For example, in 1991, the year after VE Holding, a total of seven patent infringement cases were filed in the Eastern District of Texas.  Yet, by 2015, a whopping 2558 cases - almost half of all patent cases filed that year - were brought in the Eastern District of Texas.  With the Supreme Court's new rule on patent venue, cases are now more likely to be brought in districts where companies are incorporated or tend to have their corporate headquarters, such as the District of Delaware.  Other districts that will likely see spikes in litigation after the TC Heartland decision include the Northern District of California, the Central District of California, the Southern District of New York, and the Northern District of Illinois.  Defendants may be able to rely on the Supreme Court's narrow view of patent venue to contest jurisdiction in pending cases, as long as they have not already waived the defense.

Multiparty Litigation: The TC Heartland decision may also have an effect on multiparty litigation.  Previously, plaintiffs could easily bring actions against multiple parties in one district by meeting the general venue provisions and demonstrating that each of the defendants committed an infringing action in the forum state.  Under the now-narrowed view of patent venue, plaintiffs may find themselves unable to locate one common venue for all of the alleged infringers and would be required to file patent infringement actions in multiple venues.  Maintaining multiple suits in various districts would increase the cost of litigation and demand more time and resources on the part of the plaintiffs, potentially discouraging multiparty actions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions