The State Of Indiana Bans Political Subdivisions From Enacting "Ban The Box" Restrictions

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Indiana Senate Bill 312 (the "Bill") provides, among other things, that a political subdivision of the state, including a municipality, may not prohibit an employer from obtaining or using criminal history information...
United States Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis:  Indiana Senate Bill 312 (the "Bill") provides, among other things, that a political subdivision of the state, including a municipality, may not prohibit an employer from obtaining or using criminal history information during the hiring process to the extent permitted by federal or state law, rules or regulations. 

The Indiana General Assembly recently passed the Bill, which it says was designed to create uniformity within its borders by prohibiting political subdivisions (e.g., counties, municipalities and townships) from adopting "ban the box" ordinances that restrict employers from inquiring into the criminal histories of applicants.  The only Indiana municipality that currently has ban the box restrictions for private employers is Indianapolis/Marion County.  The Indianapolis ordinance, passed in 2014, applies to certain private employees that provide services to the city, as well as public employees, and requires criminal history inquiries to either be made after an applicant is selected for an interview or, if no interview will be conducted, after a conditional offer of employment is tendered.  That law has now been preempted by SB 312.

The new Indiana state law also seeks to protect employers by providing that criminal history information concerning a current or former employee may not be introduced against the employer in a civil action based upon the employee or former employee's conduct if the criminal history information does not have a direct relationship to the underlying facts of the complaint, the criminal records have been sealed, the criminal conviction has been reversed, vacated or expunged, the individual has received a pardon, or the arrest/charge did not result in a criminal conviction.

In response to concerns raised by employee rights groups, at the time he signed SB 312, Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb also announced he would sign an executive order banning the box for Indiana state jobs, removing questions about prior arrest and criminal history from job applications for public sector positions.   

Employer Outlook

Senate Bill 312 will take effect on July 1, 2017.  Thereafter, private employers in Indianapolis that provide services to the City of Indianapolis will no longer be required to wait until an interview is conducted or a conditional offer of employment is made to make inquiries regarding criminal history.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More