ARTICLE
14 February 2017

State Data Breach Notification Statutes: A Year in Review and Preparing for 2017

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
As states continue to revise their data breach laws, organizations must continue to monitor these changes to prepare for and respond to data breaches.
United States Privacy

Following on the heels of an active 2015, where eight states enacted changes to their data breach notification laws, another five states amended their statutes in 2016, adding complexity to the current "patchwork" system of breach notification legislation. Several trends have emerged from these recent enactments. States are broadening the definition of "personal information," redefining content and timing requirements for notification, clarifying the role of encryption in providing a safe harbor, and providing carveouts for entities compliant with other privacy regulations.

The amendments enacted in Nebraska, Tennessee, and Arizona all took effect in 2016, while the updates in California and Illinois became effective on January 1, 2017. For a summary of the amendments, please click here or on the image to the right.

The divergent and frequently changing state statutes create challenges for compliance and may require organizations to revisit their security incident response plans and other privacy policies and procedures to ensure that the policies reflect these new obligations.

Next Steps

As states continue to revise their data breach laws, organizations must continue to monitor these changes to prepare for and respond to data breaches.

  • In particular, because of the expansions to what constitutes "personal information," companies must continue to conduct assessments of the information they collect and receive, and create data maps to have a better understanding of their data in order to implement appropriate procedural and security safeguards.
  • Organizations should also review security measures to ensure that an incident involving encrypted data does not go undetected.
  • Organizations also need to understand if they are required to comply with GLBA or HIPAA and how those laws affect compliance with state data breach laws.

For a summary of basic state notification requirements that apply to entities who "own" data, download Foley's State Data Breach Notification Laws chart, which is updated quarterly. In addition to monitoring state requirements, Foley regularly assists clients with drafting, reviewing, implementing, and testing policies and procedures relating to data breach response and preparedness. Foley also has depth of experience in helping clients respond to data security incidents and breaches.

Legal News Alert is part of our ongoing commitment to providing up-to-the-minute information about pressing concerns or industry issues affecting our clients and our colleagues.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More