United States:
2 Ways Courts Approach Willful Infringement After Halo
21 January 2017
WilmerHale
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
This article analyzes how district courts have addressed the
sufficiency of pleading enhanced damages after Halo at the motion
to dismiss stage. (The
first article in this two-part series considered district court
decisions on enhanced damages issued within the first six months
after Halo.)
Click here to continue reading
Originally published by Law360
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
