United States: Second Circuit Issues Landmark Decision Limiting Insider Trading Liability Of "Remote Tippees"

Last Updated: January 2 2015
Article by Matthew C. Baltay, Paul Bork and Dean F. Hanley

On December 10, 2014, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York reversed a set of insider trading convictions and reined in government prosecutions of insider traders who are outside the company in which stock is traded and receive their information second or third hand. U.S. v. Newman and Chiasson (13-1837). The case, which has been closely followed in the investment and legal communities, reestablishes the significance of the Supreme Court's decisions in Chiarella v. U.S. (1980) and Dirks v. SEC (1983), and alters the current landscape for persons trading on market intelligence.

Specifically, the ruling requires that for the government to establish criminal insider trading liability under SEC Rule 10b-5, it must prove that the person trading on inside information actually knew (a) that the information emanated from the subject company in breach of a duty and (b) that the party leaking the information stood to gain a "personal benefit" by doing so. In the absence of a showing that the trader knew both matters beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no criminal insider trading violation.

In its decision, the Second Circuit returned the law to certain bedrock principles set down by the Supreme Court in Dirks and Chiarella that the lower courts have since strayed from. The court rejected the notion of information parity in the marketplace and emphasized that the rules under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act "stop well short of prohibiting all trading on material non-public information" and instead allow "persons who acquire and act on information about companies to profit from the information they generate." In its ruling, the court also expressed some exasperation with recent insider trading prosecutions, which increasingly target remote tippees many levels removed from corporate insiders, with no indictment or prosecution of the insiders who allegedly gained from the leak. Indeed, that was what happened here, where the company tippers were not prosecuted but became prosecution witnesses.

The Facts and Convictions

The prosecutions began when the government discovered that a group of analysts from a number of hedge funds had obtained and shared material, nonpublic information from two publicly-traded technology companies (Dell and NVIDIA). The information eventually made its way to the hedge fund portfolio managers, who in turn made trades in the tech stocks and netted millions in profits for their funds, and who were then prosecuted in the case.

The portfolio managers were three and four steps removed from the corporate insiders who leaked the information; there was no evidence that they were even aware of the source of the inside information. Nevertheless, the government had charged them criminally for insider trading reasoning that as sophisticated traders, they must have known that the information was disclosed by corporate insiders in breach of a fiduciary duty, and not for any legitimate corporate purpose. The jury convicted the two managers, and the court sentenced them to 54 and 78 months in prison, respectively, with millions in fines and restitution ordered.

Insider Trading Liability

The court reviewed the law that corporate insiders may not trade on material, non-public information because they owe, and by trading violate, a special relationship of trust and confidence vis-à-vis the corporate shareholders. Similarly, insider trading occurs when a corporate insider shares information with an outsider in exchange for a direct or indirect personal benefit and the outsider trades on the information. Here, the court required that the government prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the ultimate trader knew that the corporate insider breached a duty in sharing the information and knew that the corporate insider received a personal benefit from the release of the information. Because there was no evidence that the ultimate traders knew whether the insider who gave the information stood to gain, the convictions had to be overturned and dismissed. The court also found that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the insiders received a personal benefit upon which any liability could be based.

Personal Benefit

In so ruling, the court also gave some long overdue guidance on what constitutes "personal benefit" to the leaking insider in the context of personal relationships between the insider and the recipient of the information. Here, returning to Supreme Court precedent, the court explained that "personal benefit" is broadly defined to include not only cash or similar gain by the corporate insider, but also any expected benefit that could go so far as to include the benefit one would obtain from making a gift to a close friend or relative such that the transactions "resemble trading by the insider himself followed by a gift of the profits to the recipient." The court explained that the when the information is passed on to a contact, there must be "a meaningfully close personal relationship that generates an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature." The court cautioned, however, that the standard, although permissive, does not go so far as to establish a personal benefit by the mere fact of a friendship, particularly of a casual or social nature. The evidence presented established that the Dell insider had known the analyst he gave the inside information to from business school and had looked to the analyst for professional advice but that the two were not close friends. The NVIDIA insider and the analyst he shared the information with were "family friends" that had met through their church. The court concluded that these relationships were insufficient to confer a benefit to the insider as, if they were, "practically anything would qualify."

The court rejected the government's request to permit the jury to infer from the circumstances that some benefit was provided to (or anticipated by) the insiders. Here, the court noted that to side with the government would be to render the necessary "personal benefit" element a nullity.

The Road Ahead

While the decision does nothing for the two hedge funds that were forced to shut down as a result of the weight of the prosecution, it may offer some relief to many in the investment community whose trading activity has been unduly chilled by the fear of prosecution for trading on market intelligence. The decision will also hopefully cause prosecutors to return their focus to core insider trading violations. We fully anticipate that the government will seek review of this far-reaching decision by the Supreme Court.

Finally, it should be remembered that the Newman case is about criminal prosecutions of remote tippees under SEC Rule 10b-5. The company tippers at Dell and NVIDIA who released inside information committed unlawful acts, which violated duties they owed to their employers and, if they had also received a personal benefit, would have violated Rule 10b-5 as well. But the government, for reasons of its own, chose not to prosecute the company tippers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions