United States: U.S. Supreme Court Abolishes The Presumption Of Prudence In ERISA Stock Drop Cases

A recurring scenario in ERISA litigation involves claims against fiduciaries of 401(k) retirement plans who are alleged to have breached their fiduciary duty by failing to discontinue investment in employer stock following a material drop in the stock price. The question is: Under what circumstances will a failure to stop investment in employer stock support a claim for breach of fiduciary duty? To date, every circuit—except the Sixth—that has considered the issue has applied a "presumption of prudence" that required a complaint to allege non-conclusory facts showing that the fiduciaries knew or should have known that the corporate employer faced dire circumstances that threatened its financial viability.

On June 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp, et al., No. 12-751, categorically rejecting the "presumption of prudence." The Court instead held that complaints in ERISA stock drop cases should be reviewed under Rule 12 "plausibility" standards, applying a "careful, context-sensitive scrutiny of a complaint's allegations."

DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRESUMPTION OF PRUDENCE

ERISA imposes a "prudent person" standard of care on plan fiduciaries. To comply with that standard, a fiduciary must act "with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims."

Before the Supreme Court's ruling in Fifth Third Bancorp, courts had developed a deferential "presumption of prudence" to resolve cases that involved investment in employer stock. Courts set forth various bright line tests for how this standard could be met. In the Ninth Circuit, for example, a plaintiff had to show that the company's viability was in jeopardy or was subject to serious mismanagement to rebut the presumption. In the Third Circuit, a plaintiff had to show that the company faced a dire situation. The presumption of prudence was intended to strike a balance between ensuring responsible management of company retirement plans, on the one hand, and encouraging the adoption of plans that link employee compensation to the company's success, on the other.

THE FIFTH THIRD BANCORP CASE

The plaintiffs in Fifth Third Bancorp were participants in a defined contribution retirement plan offered by Fifth Third Bancorp, a financial services company. The plan offered 20 investment options, including a fund invested in company stock. The plaintiffs alleged that, beginning in July 2007, Fifth Third Bancorp faced growing risks due to its participation in the subprime loan market and that, because of these risks, company stock was not a prudent investment. They further alleged that the defendants—most of whom were members of the company's Pension, Profit Sharing, and Medical Plan Committee—knew of the risks to the company's operations. The plaintiffs contended that these defendants breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by continuing to allow plan participants to invest in company stock.

The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to allege facts that could overcome the presumption of prudence adopted in other circuits. The Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that the presumption of prudence does not apply at the motion to dismiss stage. According to the Sixth Circuit, a fiduciary's decision to remain invested in employer stock is subject to an abuse of discretion standard, which "only requires a plaintiff to prove that 'a prudent fiduciary acting under similar circumstances would have made a different investment decision.'"

The Supreme Court granted the Bank's petition for certiorari.

THE SUPREME COURT'S REJECTION OF THE PRESUMPTION OF PRUDENCE

The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the presumption of prudence as contrary to ERISA's text. As the Court explained, nothing in ERISA "makes reference to a special 'presumption' in favor of ERISA fiduciaries," or requires plaintiffs to allege that an employer was on the "brink of collapse" to state a claim for permitting investment in employer stock. Instead, the Court held that the same standard of prudence applies to all ERISA fiduciaries and that complaints in ERISA stock drop cases should be evaluated under Rule 12 to "divide the plausible sheep from the meritless goats." Because ERISA provides that the duty of prudence "'turns on the circumstances... prevailing' at the time the fiduciary acts," the "appropriate inquiry will necessarily be context specific."

The balance of the opinion lays out a series of "considerations" that govern the application of that pleading standard in a duty of prudence case. Notably, the Court did not take up the question of whether the defendants in Fifth Third Bancorp violated their disclosure-related duties under ERISA, or whether they breached their duty of loyalty, both of which are commonly alleged alternative theories of liability in ERISA stock drop cases.

First, the Court addressed the Sixth Circuit's determination that the complaint adequately alleged that plan fiduciaries knew or should have known that investment in the employer was imprudent in light of publically available information. The Court rejected that finding, explaining that "allegations that a fiduciary should have recognized from publicly available information alone that the market was over- or undervaluing the stock are implausible as a general rule...." Instead, ERISA fiduciaries are entitled to rely on the accuracy of market prices, except in "special circumstances affecting the reliability of the market price . . . that would make reliance on the market's valuation imprudent." The Court did not explain what facts might qualify as "special circumstances."

Second, the Court turned to the standards for pleading a breach of fiduciary duty claim based on inside information. The Court held that to state such a claim, "a plaintiff must plausibly allege an alternative action" that the fiduciaries could have taken. The Court emphasized three points that "inform the requisite analysis" of any alleged alternative:

  • The action cannot involve divestment of the plan's existing holdings in employer stock, as this would require the fiduciaries to breach the federal securities laws. In most circumstances, this holding should prevent plaintiffs from alleging that fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by failing to sell plan investments based on inside information.
  • If the alleged alternative involves causing the plan to stop new purchases of company stock or to disclose nonpublic information "so that the stock would no longer be overvalued," the Court noted that "additional considerations arise," including whether the alternative "could conflict with the complex insider trading and corporate disclosure requirements imposed by federals securities laws or with the objectives of those laws." The Court did not elaborate on the answer to this legal question, except to note that the views of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission "may well be relevant."
  • Finally, if the alleged alternative does not conflict with federal securities laws, then the plaintiff must plausibly allege "that a prudent fiduciary in the defendant's position could not have concluded that stopping purchases—which the market might take as a sign that insider fiduciaries viewed the employer's stock as a bad investment—or publicly disclosing negative information would cause more harm than good to the fund, by causing a drop in the stock price and a concomitant drop in the value of the stock already held by the fund." This statement, on its face, presents a formidable pleading burden in cases where the plan already holds a significant amount of employer stock.

THE BOTTOM LINE FOR PLAN FIDUCIARIES

By rejecting a bright line test that had been adopted by most circuits, the Fifth Third Bancorp opinion adds uncertainty to ERISA stock drop cases and can be expected to engender increased litigation against plan fiduciaries. The opinion also provides fertile ground for motions to dismiss claims that continued investment in employer stock was imprudent. It will be important to watch how district and appellate courts deal with these issues over the next several years.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions