UK: How Do You "Know" If Your Employee Is Disabled?

A duty to make reasonable adjustments in respect of a disabled employee will not arise if the employer does not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know:

  • that the individual disabled, or
  • that he or she is likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage because of that disability

 (paragraph 20, schedule 8 of the Equality Act 2010).

The question which will often arise for employers, therefore, is how do you "know" whether an employee is disabled? Is the employee telling you he thinks he has a certain condition enough? Do you need a formal medical report or diagnosis? What questions do you need to ask?

We take a look at some of the case law surrounding this issue, including last week's judgment of the EAT in Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, to give some practical guidance on what employers need to consider when assessing whether they need to carry out reasonable adjustments.

"Reasonably expected to know" about the disability

 In many cases it will be obvious to the employer that the employee is disabled, and so there will be no dispute about whether they 'knew' of the disability.

In many cases, though (and especially in cases of mental illness), the situation is more subtle. Employers are not medical professionals – nor are they expected to be – and it will often not be clear that the employee is suffering from an underlying condition, or that that condition constitutes a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. However, if the employer could 'reasonably be expected to know' about the disability (and about the substantial disadvantage the employee is placed under), even if in practice they did not actually know, then the duty to make reasonable adjustments will still arise.

Employers need to be careful, therefore, to keep an open mind as to whether an individual is disabled, and make sure to make all reasonable enquiries.

Information from the employee

The fact that an employee has not told the employer about his condition does not automatically mean the employer could not reasonably have been expected to know he was disabled. In the case of Department of Work and Pensions v Hall, for example, there were sufficient facts to have put the employer on notice that the employee might have been disabled (knowledge about the employee's application for disability tax credit, the fact that a member of the interview panel knew the employee previously, and the employee's 'volatile behaviour', for example) even though she did not ever bring her condition to the employer's intention. The EAT held that employer should have known about the disability.

On the other hand, it does not follow that an employer will be deemed to know about the disability just because the employee has said that he thinks he is suffering from a particular condition, or his doctor has diagnosed him as such, without providing any further medical evidence. In the latest judgment from the EAT on this issue, the case of Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, Mr Cox had informed his employer that he was suffering from bi-polar disorder, but this was never properly confirmed to the employer by medical evidence (not least because Mr Cox would not agree to the disclosure of his medical records). The Tribunal held, and the EAT agreed, that the employer did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the disability. This may seem surprising at first glance, given that Mr Cox had clearly set out in writing to his employer the dates, symptoms, likely trigger and detailed effects of the condition, but the Tribunal did not look at that fact in isolation. The employer, having been put on notice by the employee of a possible disability, asked "all the right questions" – it obtained occupational health reports, sought medical opinions on whether the employee was disabled, tried to get a report from the employee's GP (which was refused by the employee), and sought a formal diagnosis of the condition. Despite all this, there was no indication, other than what the employee was telling them, that the employee was disabled.

The advice to employers therefore, if an employee is telling you that he thinks he is disabled, or if you have some suspicion that the employee might have a disability but the employee has not said anything, is to always ask further questions. Do not just rely on what the employee is (or is not) telling you.

Medical information

 A significant point to bear in mind in the case of Cox above was Mr Cox's refusal to let his GP hand over medical notes to his employer. Such refusal will be relevant to whether an employer is deemed to have had knowledge of the disability, but employers who encounter such refusal should not simply stop making enquiries at this first hurdle. If the employee will not give consent to release medical notes, ask if there is any alternative – will the employee consent to seeing an occupational health provider ("OHP"), or to this OHP speaking directly to the GP, for example? Always remember that the employer must make reasonable enquiries into whether the employee is likely to be disabled – the standard of what is 'reasonable' may be lower when the employee is not cooperative, but this will not mean the employer can sit back and do nothing.

On the facts of Wilcox v Birmingham CAB Services Ltd, the EAT held that the employer could not reasonably have been expected to know that Ms Wilcox was disabled until it received a consultant's report (which was something which had been jointly commissioned at the direction of the Employment Tribunal following a claim having been commenced). Again, though, this does not mean that an employer can rely on not having sought such a report in the first place – it will still be required to make reasonable enquiries which in most cases will include seeking an OHP report.

Even once a report has been obtained, whether a 'label' or a full medical diagnosis has been attached to the employee's condition in that report is not necessarily relevant, as the Cox case showed. Again, the correct action for the employer is to look at the facts and the medical evidence in the round and consider whether there is anything in them which should lead them to make further reasonable enquiries. Employers should not become fixated on the fact that the OHP does not give a formal diagnosis – the employee might still be disabled.

What about an OHP's report which specifically states that an employee is not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010? Can an employer rely on this to say that it did not know (and could not reasonably have been expected to know) about the employee's disability?

In the case of Gallop v Newport County Council the employer successfully used this argument both at the Tribunal and the EAT. This is an unusual case, though, and one which a prudent employer might not rely on too heavily, at least for the time being. Although the question of whether an employee is disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 is one which is often asked by employers to OHPs, case law certainly indicates that the test is (or should be) a legal one not a medical one and the OHP's analysis in this regard should therefore not be decisive. It seems strange therefore that, in light of the EAT's decision in this case, an employer is essentially able to argue that they had no knowledge (and could not reasonably have had any knowledge) of an employee's disability, simply "because the OHP report said so". The case has been heard in the Court of Appeal recently and we expect a judgment at any time, but in the meantime employers should remain cautious about simply finding a 'sympathetic' OHP who will tell them what they want to hear (that the employee is not disabled), and relying on that to deny all knowledge of an employee's disability.

"All the right questions"

It is clear therefore that employers should make reasonable enquiries and ask "all the right questions" to ascertain whether an employee is disabled – if they fail to do so then they are unlikely to be able to argue that they "could not reasonably have known" about a disability.

What "all the right questions" are will depend on the circumstances, but employers must be careful not to simply rely on what the employee or the OHP is (or is not) telling them before deciding they have no duty to make reasonably adjustments. Cases such as Cox, Gallop and Wilcox are helpful to employers who are faced with having to argue at Tribunal that they did not know (and could not reasonably have been expected to know) about a disability, but asking "all the right questions" in the first place will hopefully ensure an employer never has to rely on such arguments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions