Drivers who have a cell phone in hand are committing an offence, even if not using the phone at the time, Ontario's top court has decided, overturning an appeal judge.

While the driver, Kazemi, was stopped at a stop light, a police officer saw her with a cell phone in her hand. The driver said that the cell phone had fallen from the seat to the floor when she stopped, and that she had picked it up when she got to the red light.

The trial justice convicted her of the offence of "holding or using a hand-held wireless communication device" while driving, pursuant to section 78.1 of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act.  The appeal judge, however, found her not-guilty.  In his opinion, there must be some sustained physical holding of the device in order to meet the "holding" requirement, so that momentary handling was not enough.  We previously wrote about the appeal decision on this blog.

The Ontario Court of Appeal disagreed, and stated that "having it in one's hand" is enough to be guilty of the offence of "holding" a cell phone.  According to the Court of Appeal, that interpretation best meets the objective of road safety and avoids the "enforcement challenge" of requiring a police officer to have "continued observation of the driver" for a period of time in order to write a ticket.

The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision makes it much more difficult for drivers to beat charges under Ontario's distracted driving law.  We had previously blogged about some of the creative arguments and alibis tried by drivers, including "it was a garage door opener"; one expects that those arguments and alibis will be unsuccessful in most cases, especially in light of the Court of Appeal's decision.

As a result of this decision, employers may wish to ensure that their mobile device / distracted driving policy prohibits employees from having a cell phone in hand while driving.

R. v. Kazemi, 2013 ONCA 585

About Dentons

Dentons is a global firm driven to provide you with the competitive edge in an increasingly complex and interconnected marketplace. We were formed by the March 2013 combination of international law firm Salans LLP, Canadian law firm Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC) and international law firm SNR Denton.

Dentons is built on the solid foundations of three highly regarded law firms. Each built its outstanding reputation and valued clientele by responding to the local, regional and national needs of a broad spectrum of clients of all sizes – individuals; entrepreneurs; small businesses and start-ups; local, regional and national governments and government agencies; and mid-sized and larger private and public corporations, including international and global entities.

Now clients benefit from more than 2,500 lawyers and professionals in 79 locations in 52 countries across Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, Central Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Russia and the CIS, the UK and the US who are committed to challenging the status quo to offer creative, actionable business and legal solutions.

Learn more at www.dentons.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

For more information, visit our Occupational Health & Safety Law blog at www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com