Canada: A Canadian Court Need Not Recognize A Foreign Court’s Rectification Order For It To Bind The Canada Revenue Agency: Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd. v Canada, 2017 FCA 39

Last Updated: October 1 2018

Introduction: Rectification and Its Tax Implications

Rectification allows parties to fix mistakes in their legal documents. For instance, if by mistake a legal instrument fails to capture the agreement that it was intended to document, the parties may ask a court to rectify the instrument so that it aligns with their intended agreement. In other words, rectification allows a court to preserve the parties’ true intentions in the face of an erroneous transcription of those intentions.

Rectification boasts one important difference from a mere amendment. Unlike a document amended by the parties themselves, a rectified document can undo a tax consequence resulting from its pre-rectified form. In other words, the CRA must abide by Canadian court’s rectification order (see: Dale v Canada, [1977] 3 FC 235 (FCA)).

So, it’s no surprise that rectification jurisprudence is rife with applicants seeking relief from unintended tax consequences. This trend raises the concern that taxpayers may use the remedy as a means of retroactive tax planning.

The CRA says that rectification amounts to retroactive tax planning if “the taxpayer is asking the court not to rectify the transaction back to its intended form, but to undo the intended transaction and put in place a new one formed after the original transaction.” Put differently, rectification may permit a taxpayer to re-characterize the initial transaction so as to preempt pending tax litigation.

Rectification alters tax obligations because it speaks to the private-law relationships underlying those obligations. In other words, a person’s tax obligations depend on that person’s rights or duties under, say, contract law, property law, corporate law, and so forth. In particular, tax law generally respects the instruments purporting to create these private-law rights and duties. So, by altering these instruments, rectification alters the private-law rights and duties these instruments create, which, in turn, undoes the tax obligations resulting from these instruments as originally executed.

As a result, if a rectified document were to put in place a transaction that the taxpayer did not intend until after executing the impugned document, rectification would, in effect, re-characterize the initial transaction. And any pending tax litigation based on the transaction’s original characterization becomes redundant.

This concern prompted the Supreme Court of Canada to tighten the reins on rectification in tax cases. Until the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Canada v Fairmont Hotels Inc. (2016 SCC 56), some provincial courts had seemingly allowed parties to rectify, not simply the instrument recording their transaction, but the transaction itself. In Fairmont, the Supreme Court clarified that “rectification is unavailable where the basis for seeking it is that one or both of the parties wish to amend not the instrument recording their agreement, but the agreement itself (ibid, at para 13, emphasis in original). In other words, where parties seek rectification, a court’s task is “to restore the parties to their original bargain, not to rectify a belatedly recognized error of judgement by one party or the other” (ibid, quoting Performance Industries Ltd. v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd., 2002 SCC 19, at para 31).

To this end, the Supreme Court concluded that rectification is available only if:

  1. there was a prior agreement with definite and ascertainable terms;
  2. the agreement was still in effect at the time that the instrument was executed;
  3. the instrument fails to accurately record the agreement; and
  4. the instrument, if rectified, would carry out the parties’ prior agreement (Fairmont, supra, at para 38).

In short, the CRA must comply with a Canadian court’s rectification order. But does the CRA need to abide by the rectification order of a foreign court? This question lay at the center of the dispute in Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd. v The Queen.

Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd. v Canada

Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd., a Montreal-based, Canadian private corporation, had two wholly owned subsidiaries: a Cyprus corporation and a Barbados corporation. Each subsidiary carried on an active international-shipping business.

In 2005 and 2006, the two subsidiaries declared a total of $250 million in dividends to Canadian Forest, which reported the amounts on its Canadian T2 tax returns as dividend income. As such, Canadian Forest deducted the dividends from its income under paragraph 113(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, which essentially allows a Canadian corporation to receive tax-free dividends stemming from the active business income of qualifying foreign corporations.

In 2008, the Canada Revenue Agency commenced an audit of Canadian Forest’s 2005 and 2006 tax years. It seems that the audit raised concerns that the CRA might deny Canadian Forest the deduction under paragraph 113(1)(a). So, not long after the CRA audit began, Canadian Forest and its subsidiaries sought rectification orders in the subsidiaries’ respective jurisdictions—i.e., Cyprus and Barbados. The parties asked each foreign court to retroactively rectify the relevant subsidiary’s 2005 and 2006 resolutions to identify the advanced funds as a loan instead of a dividend. Each court granted the requested order. Canadian Forest didn’t notify the Canada Revenue Agency about either foreign proceeding, and the CRA therefore didn’t participate in these proceedings.

The CRA reassessed Canadian Forest and disallowed the deductions claimed under paragraph 113(1)(a). Canadian Forest appealed to the Tax Court of Canada and argued, on the basis of the foreign rectification orders, that the proceeds from its subsidiaries weren’t dividends.

Prior to the appeal hearing, Canadian Forest filed a motion to have the Tax Court of Canada determine a single question of law: Do the foreign rectification orders preclude the Minister of National Revenue from treating payments from Canadian Forest’s subsidiaries as dividends in the appeal? (Canadian Forest’s appeal itself was held in abeyance pending the court’s determination of this question.)

The Tax Court of Canada held that the foreign rectification orders didn’t preclude the Minister from taking the appeal position that the payments were dividends (2016 TCC 43). The court pointed out that a foreign judgment isn’t automatically enforceable in Canada; it must first be recognized as enforceable by a Canadian court. This required Canadian Forest to pursue a recognition order in Canada for the two foreign judgments. Because Canadian Forest hadn’t sought such an order, the Tax Court reasoned, the foreign rectification judgments didn’t bind the Minister. That is, to bind the Minister, the foreign rectification judgments would need to be recognized by a Canadian court. The Minister could thus disregard the foreign judgments. Although the foreign judgments didn’t bind the Minister, the Tax Court clarified, they still constitute facts, which the court hearing the taxpayer’s appeal couldn’t ignore even if the orders themselves weren’t enforceable in Canada.

In sum, the Tax Court’s decision was two-fold. First, the foreign rectification orders didn’t force the Minister to treat the payments to Canadian Forest as loans because those orders weren’t enforceable in Canada. Second, even though they weren’t enforceable in Canada, the foreign rectification orders still served to evidence the fact that the resolutions were rectified, providing for loans instead of dividends.

Canadian Forest appealed the Tax Court’s decision to the Federal Court of Appeal.

The Federal Court of Appeal not only allowed the appeal and set aside the Tax Court’s judgment, but also declined to answer the question per Canadian Forest’s original motion and dismissed that motion altogether (2017 FCA 39).

The appellate court agreed with both the lower court and Canadian Forest that the foreign judgments were facts that the court hearing the appeal couldn’t disregard—even if the foreign orders hadn’t been recognized in Canada. According to the Federal Court of Appeal, the foreign orders were proof that the corporate resolutions were rectified, transforming the dividend payments into indebtedness.

But the Federal Court of Appeal ultimately concluded that the Tax Court should have refused to answer the question put forth by Canadian Forest in its motion. The appellate court rejected the Tax Court’s premise that the foreign rectification orders would bind the Minister if they were recognized by a Canadian court. Because the Minister wasn’t a party to the foreign proceedings, the appellate court reasoned, a recognition order in Canada wouldn’t have any bearing on whether those proceedings could bind the Minister. This issue was best left with the Tax Court judge who heard the underlying appeal and considered all the evidence.

New Questions

In Canadian Forest, the Federal Court of Appeal suggested that Canada’s federal tax courts can determine whether a foreign rectification order will bind the Canada Revenue Agency. Given the concern that a rectification order might condone retroactive tax planning, the Canadian Forest decision leaves Canada’s tax community with several questions:

  • How will Canada’s tax courts deal with orders from foreign jurisdiction with lower requirements for rectification than those in Canada? In Canada, rectification is an equitable remedy, and thus it falls outside the jurisdiction of the federal tax courts. But Canadian Forest seemingly requires a federal tax court to assess whether the facts underlying the foreign order justify rectification in Canada.
  • In Canadian Forest, both the Tax Court and the Court of Appeal held that a foreign rectification order is a fact for the purpose of the tax appeal. What if the foreign jurisdiction contains self-help remedies with the same effect as rectification but without the need for a court order?
  • Will the CRA attempt to participate in foreign proceedings with Canadian tax implications? Or will taxpayers need to give the CRA notice of foreign proceedings with Canadian tax implications?

Tax Tips: Rectification & the Importance of Tax Planning

Canada imposes arduous requirements on a party seeking rectification. In particular, you must demonstrate that the documented transaction or agreement wasn’t the one that you intended. Evidence of your intended transaction or agreement could consist of, say, a tax-planning memorandum that was previously prepared by an experienced Canadian tax lawyer.

The Canadian Forest decision suggests that a taxpayer should consider pursuing rectification in a foreign jurisdiction with less strenuous requirements if the remedy is indeed available in such a jurisdiction.

Regardless, taxpayers bear a heavy burden when asking a court to rectify erroneous documents that resulted in unfavorable tax consequences. You don’t want to find yourself in this position. Instead, seek the assistance of an experienced Canadian tax lawyer, who can plan your transaction to foresee and minimize tax liability and draft the related instruments to ensure that they match your intentions.

The information is thought to be current to date of posting. Income tax law changes frequently and content may no longer reflect the current state of the law. This document is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. You should not act or rely on any information in this document without first seeking legal advice. This material is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any specific questions on any legal matter, you should consult a professional legal services provider.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Contact the Author?
Click here to email the Author
In Association with
In Partnership with
Other Canada Advice Centres
Competition and Antitrust
Labour and Employment
Intellectual Property
More Advice Centers
Useful Resources
Forms available to download for income tax filing in Canada.
Hear David J. Rotfleisch discuss timely and highly topical tax matters during appearances and interviews with specialist publications.
Useful explanatory videos of income tax matters.
The following questions and answers are based on the proposed measures that were announced on December 7, 2015.
The official Government website of the CRA.
This guide is for any person who deals with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The guide gives you information on the 16 rights set out in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights and explains what you can do if you believe that the CRA has not respected your rights.
The Office of the Taxpayers' Ombudsman (OTO) works to enhance the Canada Revenue Agency's (CRA) accountability in its service to, and treatment of, taxpayers and benefit recipients through independent and impartial reviews of service-related complaints and systemic issues.
Ontario personal income tax is an annual tax collected from individuals who are Ontario residents on the last day of the tax year or have income earned in Ontario for the tax year.
The following documents provide instructions for filing your 2015 income tax return.
If you earned income in B.C. or operated a Corporation with a permanent establishment in B.C. last year you need to file an income tax return. Find out when you need to file your income tax return, and if any tax credits or rebates apply to you.
Generally, a corporation must file an Alberta corporate income tax return (AT1) for each taxation year during which it has a permanent establishment in Alberta.
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions