Nigeria: Service Of Originating Processes At The Federal High Court Of Nigeria: Did Akeredolu v Abraham (2018) LPELR-44067 (SC) Settle The Controversy

Last Updated: 22 November 2018
Article by Ebuka Obidigwe

Introduction

Overtime, it has continued to be a raging controversy among legal minds on whether leave of Court should indeed be required for service of an originating process sealed from the registry of a State judicial division of the Federal High Court of Nigeria to another. Put differently, should leave of Court be required for service of originating processes issued in the Lagos State judicial division to a Defendant resident in Ogun or Anambra State.

It is to be noted that this controversy arose out of the divergent opinions of Legal Practitioners over the following issues:

  1. The administrative set-up of the Federal High Court of Nigeria as well as the true purport of the legal phrase "out of jurisdiction" as used in the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2009, and
  2. The scope of application of the Sheriffs and Civil Processes Act ("SCPA"), Cap 56 ...., Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

I shall summarily comment on the particularised issues stated above.

1. The administrative set-up of the Federal High Court of Nigeria

A careful consideration of Section 19 of the Federal High Court Act reveals that the Federal High Court is conferred with a nationwide jurisdiction i.e. there is only one Federal High Court of Nigeria, however, has judicial divisions in the various states and the Federal Capital Territory for administrative convenience.

The above position is further strengthened by the provisions of Order 6, Rule 31 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2009, wherein "out of jurisdiction" for the purposes of the Federal High Court of Nigeria was defined to mean out of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The conclusion drawn from the above therefore, is that the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of Nigeria is one for all intents and purposes.

2. The scope of application of the "SCPA"

It has been argued by a school of thought, that the provisions of the SCPA do not apply to the Federal High Court of Nigeria. This is in view of the fact that the Federal High Court which was established as a federal revenue court in 1976 did not exist at the time of the enactment of the SCPA and therefore was not contemplated by that legislation. According to the proponents of this view, it is the intendment of the draftsmen of the SCPA that its provisions apply only to the High Court of the various States. This can be clearly deduced from the wordings used in the SCPA. Please see the Marginal note in Part VII of the SCPA, and Sections 96-98 of the SCPA.

However, our judicial authorities jointly hold a different view, as it has been held in a plethora of cases that the provisions of the SCPA are applicable in all High Courts, including the Federal High Court. Chief among these judicial authorities, is the famous case of MV Arabella v NAIC (2008) 11 NWLR (Pt 1097) 182 at 20,221 H-A.

Did Akeredolu v Abraham (supra) come to the rescue?

In answering the above question, my humble view is that the Federal High Court has jurisdiction throughout the federation of Nigeria; and service out of jurisdiction for the purposes of the Federal High Court means out of Nigeria as a Country.

It is very clear from a community reading of Order 6, Rules 13 & 14 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2009 that leave of Court is required for service of an originating process out of jurisdiction. However, the pertinent question to ask is whether "out of jurisdiction" as used in relation to the Federal High Court conveys the same meaning as "out of State" as envisaged under the SCPA. The answer will be in the negative because while "out of jurisdiction" means out of Nigeria, "out of State" means out of a State in Nigeria to another State.

However, and unfortunately, our Courts are of different view about this position and have consequently in a myriad of cases held that failure to obtain leave of Court to serve an originating process sealed out of the registry of a State judicial division of the Federal High Court to another, nullifies the proceedings. See Ben Obi Nwabueze & Anor v Justice obi Okoye (1988) LPELR SC. 24/1988; NEPA v. Onah (1997) 1 NWLR (Pt . 484) 680 at 694

In the famous case of Owners of the MV Arabella v Nigeria Agricultural Insurance Corporation (Supra), the Supreme re-echoed the seemingly settle d law that leave of Court is required for service of a Writ of Summons out of jurisdiction and that this requirement applies to the Federal High Court as well as the State High Courts. In MV Arabella's case, the appellant commenced a suit against the respondent at the Federal High Court in Lagos. Service of the Writ of Summons was effected on the Respondent in Abuja. The Respondent filed a preliminary objection claiming that the Writ of Summons was improperly issued and served due to the failure to endorse it in accordance with the provisions of Section 97 of the SCPA. The trial court set aside the Writ of Summons and service thereof and dismissed the suit.

On appeal to the Supreme Court, the apex Court affirmed that the issuance and service of the Writ of Summons was void, but set aside the order dismissing the suit, while substituting same with an order to strike it out instead.

The apex Court further held as follows:

"The provisions of section 97 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act are applicable in all High Courts, including the Federal High Court. The provision of the section has nothing to do with the coverage of the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court, which is nationwide. It is therefore a total misconception of the law to contend that the provision of the section is inapplicable to the Federal High Court because the jurisdiction of that court covers the entire nation."

It is to be noted that decision in MV Arabella's case has been criticised by legal practitioners because it applied principles derived from cases relating to State High Courts to the Federal High Court. And in so doing, the Supreme Court, with due respect, overlooked the fact that the Federal High Court's Rules, operational at the time, specifically state that, with respect to the Federal High Court, 'out of jurisdiction' means 'out of Nigeria'. The apex Court further did not take into consideration, the fact that the Federal High Court which was established as a federal revenue Court in 1976 did not exist at the time of the enactment of the SCPA and therefore was not contemplated by that legislation.

In the most recent case of Akeredolu v. Abraham (2018) LPELR-44067 (SC), the Supreme Court appeared to have departed from its decision made in MV Arabella's case and therefore put to eternal rest the raging controversy.

However, a careful look at Akeredolu case reveals that although the Supreme Court commented to say that the Federal High Court has one nationwide jurisdiction and as such leave is not required for service of originating processes out of one State to another, it is my view that such comment by way of obiter dictum, does not form the ratio decidendi of the Court. It is therefore legally right to posit that in the absence of an express attempt by the apex Court to overrule its earlier position on this issue as laid down in the MV Arabella case, its obiter in Akeredolu's case cannot replace the ratio decidendi in MV Arabella's case. It is trite principle of law that the obiter dictum of a later case cannot overrule the ratio decidendi in an earlier one even where reached in manifest ignorance or per incuriam. Therefore, the law as it is today, is as laid down in the MV Arabella case.

As the controversy continues to rage among legal minds, it is my hope that an early opportunity will present itself before the erudite and Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court, in order to afford them the opportunity to correct the Court's decision in the case of MV Arabella.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions