Nigeria: Tax Substitution: What The Law Says As FIRS Seeks To Recover Taxes Through Commercial Banks

Last Updated: 9 November 2018
Article by Jerome Okoro

INTRODUCTION

Following its earlier expression of interest to go after alleged tax defaulters with huge funds in Nigerian banks, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) recently started issuing letters to commercial banks, appointing them as tax collection agents for such customers.1  The letters contain directives to the banks to freeze the named accounts in order to facilitate tax recovery. This mode of tax recovery through third parties, known as 'tax substitution,'2 especially with the account-freezing dimension that FIRS introduced to it, has raised diverse reactions from various commentators. Some view the measure as a laudable scheme with good prospects of raising substantial revenue for government and blocking tax leakages. Others air their reservations on the appropriateness of FIRS' approach when viewed in the mirror of relevant laws and its far-reaching economic implications for the Nigerian investment climate.3 This article identifies and responds to the legal controversies of tax enforcement through tax substitution with a highlight on the status and role of the notice appointing banks as taxpayers' agents.

POWER OF THE TAX MAN TO APPOINT AN AGENT FOR A TAXABLE PERSON

Before the enactment of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2007 ("FIRS Act"), Section 49 of the Companies Income Tax Act ("CITA"), 1990 and Section 50 of the Personal Income Tax Act ("PITA"), 1993 provided for tax substitution by the tax authorities.4 Section 31 of FIRS Act reproduced these already existing provisions as follows:

"(1) The Service may by notice in writing appoint any person to be the agent of a taxable person if the circumstances provided in sub-section (2) of this section makes it expedient to do so.

(2) The agent appointed under subsection (1) of this section may be required to pay any tax payable by the taxable person from any money which may be held by the agent of the taxable person."

From the wording of the above provision, appointment of the agent is discretionary as it depends on the consideration of the tax authority that such appointment has become expedient. However, the actual recovery of tax through an agent so appointed is subject to 2 conditions implicit in the above-mentioned laws, namely:

  1. That money is held by the agent; and
  2. That tax has become payable by the taxable person.

WHEN IS TAX PAYABLE?

The second condition in Section 31(2) of the FIRS Act embodies the knotty issues of tax substitution. It raises the cardinal question: when does tax become payable by a taxable person to warrant tax recovery through a FIRS-appointed agent of the taxable person?

Generally, the process of income tax payment commences with tax assessment – computing the tax liability of a taxable person. Section 65 (1) of the Companies Income Tax Act5 ("CITA") by which companies are taxed enables FIRS to raise an assessment on a company when the time allowed for the company's submission of its audited accounts and returns has expired. Section 54(1) of the Personal Income Tax Act6 ("PITA") which applies to individuals and other unincorporated entities, makes a similar provision. There are two broad types of tax assessment namely: assessment based on a taxpayer's returns and Best of Judgment assessment. The former is computed with information from the tax payer's returns and audited financial statement which can be verified by the tax authority. With the introduction of Tax Administration (Self-Assessment) Regulations, 2011, self-assessment provisions in existing tax laws like Sections 52(2) and 53 of CITA and Section 44 of PITA came to life as taxpayers started embracing the self-assessment mode. The self-assessment regime offers taxpayers a voluntary compliance opportunity whereby they compute and pay their taxes, and then file self-assessment returns with evidence of the payment. The essence of formal assessment here is to confirm the accuracy of the payment. Where the taxable person fails to comply with self-assessment requirements, the self-assessment tax provisions still require the tax authority to raise administrative assessment prior to tax recovery. This indicates that in the absence of voluntary compliance, tax assessment and the opportunity of objection are indispensable.

Sections 65 (2)(b) and 65 (3) of CITA; and sections 54 (2) (b) and 54 (3) of PITA make similar provisions on Best of Judgment Assessment. In both cases, the two circumstances warranting a Best-of-Judgment assessment are that: (a) The tax authority refused to accept the audited financial statement and returns filed by the taxable person; and (b) The taxable person has not submitted returns within the prescribed period or might not even have been in the tax net (i.e. has not registered and obtained Taxpayer's Identification Number) but the authority has cause to believe that the person is liable to tax.7  Best of Judgment assessment also buttresses the tax law position that with or without returns or financial statements from a taxable person, FIRS must first issue an assessment and let the objection and appeal periods run out before any attempt at enforcing payment.

Service of an assessment on the taxpayer is followed by the taxpayer's objection in writing to the tax authority stating its grounds of fact and law for the objection. The tax authority in turn considers the objection and also exercises one of three options namely: amending the assessment; discharging it outright or maintaining its position on the assessment. If it chooses the last of the three, it would issue a Notice of Refusal to Amend the Assessment (NORA). The assessment is said to be final and conclusive if at the expiration of the period stipulated by law for objection, the taxpayer fails to object to the assessment; or having objected and received a NORA, fails to further challenge the assessment in court within the stipulated period after the NORA. Paragraph 13 (3), 5th Schedule to the FIRS Act captures the latter instance.

A disputed tax assessment that is under litigation becomes final and conclusive when the court upholds it in a final judgment, unless the taxpayer proceeds on appeal against the judgment within the stipulated time. Thus the assessment never becomes final and conclusive until all appellate opportunities up to the Supreme Court are exhausted.  Paragraph 16(3), 5th Schedule to the FIRS Act however provides that despite the pendency of an appeal against a decision of the Tax Appeal Tribunal, tax shall be paid in accordance with that decision within one month of notification of the amount of tax payable. This is obviously meant to ensure that the revenue does not lose the time value of tax money to litigation considering that tax refund under Section 23 of the FIRS Act would avail the taxpayer who after paying the disputed tax, succeeds in the appeal.

There have been judicial restatements of the prerequisites for tax enforcement in several decided cases. In Federal Inland Revenue Service v. Gazetta Communications Limited8, FIRS assessed the Defendant to various taxes following an audit exercise, upon the Defendant's failure to pay or object to the taxes within 30 days of the assessment, FIRS brought an action in the Federal High Court under the undefended list procedure. The court held that the Defendant's failure to react to the assessment as and when stipulated by law made the assessment final and conclusive, hence the tax became recoverable by FIRS. Also in Medos v. Commissioner for South African Revenue Service9, the Supreme Court of South Africa voiced the consensus that "where no objection is made to an assessment issued by the relevant tax authority, the assessment is final and conclusive as between the tax authority and the taxpayer."

When an assessment becomes final and conclusive, the tax therein becomes payable. In other words, the tax is payable immediately after the expiration of the period for objection or appeal as the case may be, or after exhaustion of all appellate opportunities.

THE ASSESSMENT-OBJECTION PROCESS IN TAX SUBSTITUTION

Section 31(1) and (2) of FIRS Act are open to an interpretation that the assessment and objection periods must have been exhausted, hence the tax must have become payable before FIRS can appoint an agent for the taxpayer.  Such a construction may however be incorrect because, as noted earlier, tax becoming payable under Section 31(2) in the process described above is a condition for recovery of the tax from the FIRS-appointed agent, and not a condition for appointing the agent ab initio. The agent is appointed based on FIRS' discretion upon deeming it expedient to recover tax from the taxpayer's money in the agent's hands. But after the appointment, the actual recovery of tax is subject to the tax becoming payable. In this regard, Section 31 (5) of the FIRS Act implies that notification of the appointment of the tax agent doubles as a notice of assessment. The section provides:

"The provisions of this Act with respect to objections and appeals shall apply to any notice given under this section as if such notice were an assessment."

The above provision means that in tax substitution (i.e. tax recovery from FIRS-appointed agents), the notice appointing the agent serves as a notice of assessment. Thus, the assessment-objection process starts with the notice of appointment of the agent.

The first issue on the appointment notice is whether it ought to be served directly on that taxable person whose liability is alleged considering that it is deemed an assessment notice by virtue of Section 31(5) of the FIRS Act or whether service on only the appointed agent would suffice. Section 68 of CITA, with material similarity to Section 57 of PITA provides:

"The Board shall cause to be served on or sent by registered post to each company, or person in whose name a company is chargeable, whose name appears on the assessment lists, a notice stating the amount of the total profits, the tax payable, the place at which such payment should be made, and setting out the rights of the company under the next following section." (emphasis added)

The highlighted part in the above provision indicates alternative service of the appointment cum assessment notice on the taxpayer or his appointed agent. In other words, FIRS' choice to serve it on the agent could suffice and dispense with further service on the taxable person. Nonetheless, service on only the appointed agent (the banks in recent cases) offends the demands of fair hearing in Section 36(1), 1999 Constitution that a person against whom a decision would be taken must be given a prior opportunity of a representation. This constitutional angle is further addressed in details below. The above provision on assessment also requires that the notice of appointment being an assessment, must state the total profits, the tax payable and the right of objection to the assessment.

FIRS' POWER OF FUND FREEZING, CONFISCATION OR SEIZURE

Section 44 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) which creates a general ground for account freezing equally provides strict safeguards to that power. It states:

"No moveable property or any interest in an immovable property shall be taken possession of compulsorily and no right over or interest in any such property shall be acquired compulsorily in any part of Nigeria except in the manner and for the purposes prescribed by a law that, among other things –

"(a) requires the prompt payment of compensation therefore and

(b) gives to any person claiming such compensation a right of access for the determination of his interest in the property and the amount of compensation to a court of law or tribunal or body having jurisdiction in that part of Nigeria."

Subsection (2) of Section 44 provides:

"Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall be construed as affecting any general law (a) for the imposition or enforcement of any tax, rate or duty."

Money in a bank account is in the category of movable property referred to in Section 44 above.  The section requires that the freezing of an account must conform to an enabling law. A pertinent question here is: which tax law enables FIRS to freeze accounts? By Section 8(1)(g) of the FIRS Act, FIRS can, "adopt measures to identify, trace, freeze, confiscate or seize proceeds derived from tax fraud or evasion." This section seemingly throws a naked prerogative at FIRS as it lacks necessary safeguards from likely abuse. In comparison, Section 34(1) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commissions (EFCC) Act which enables EFCC to freeze bank accounts pursuant to its investigative duties provides a shield from abuse. The provision mandates EFCC to first obtain an ex parte order of court prior to the freezing of an account.10 It is however clear that Section 8(1)(g) of the FIRS Act does not relate to tax substitution under Section 31 of the Act. From the wording of Section 8(1)(g), FIRS' power to freeze accounts relates only to "proceeds derived from tax fraud or evasion." Tax fraud or evasion are crimes specifically embodied in the law which must be established by judicial procedure; not administratively by an executive authority. Section 34(1) of the EFCC Act enables EFCC to freeze an account with an ex parte order of court upon mere suspicion by EFCC that the funds relate to a financial crime. Section 8(1)(g) of the FIRS Act, on the other hand, makes the issue of tax fraud and tax evasion conclusive. In other words, either or both of the two crimes must have been established before that section can be invoked to freeze an account or confiscate funds. Where a tax liability has not been subjected to the challenge process which might bring it under dispute, the issue of tax fraud or evasion is inexistent. It is also beyond contest that a person cannot be held culpable of tax fraud or evasion whose right to challenge an allegation of tax liability against him is still open. This means that Section 8(1)(g) of the FIRS Act does not justify FIRS' directive to the banks to freeze their customers' accounts for the purpose of tax substitution.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL ANGLE

The opening provision on fair hearing in Section 36(1) of the Constitution grants fair hearing to a person coming before a court or other legally established tribunal. Subsection (2) enables government bodies to determine legal questions affecting the civil rights and obligations of a person with a strict condition that the person be given an opportunity to make representations before any decision affecting him can be reached. A notice from FIRS appointing an agent for a taxable person, when viewed as an assessment notice under Section 31(5) of the FIRS Act, is a mere allegation, and not a verdict of tax liability against the taxable person. The notice is therefore subject to the constitutional rule of fair hearing which entails that it must clearly state the alleged liability and be served directly on the taxable person to afford the person an opportunity to object. To take any further step on the notice, like account freezing, before the opportunities of objection and appeal are exhausted, is against the constitutional demands of fair hearing.

NAVIGATING THE LAWS CAREFULLY

Enforcement of the relevant laws on tax recovery as analysed above requires adherence to constitutional standards of fair hearing. The way to meet the standards is by creating an avenue for a taxable person to challenge a tax assessment raised against him prior to tax enforcement by the relevant authority. Section 31(5) of the FIRS Act further places this fair hearing duty on FIRS by viewing the notice of appointment of an agent as an assessment notice, and mandating that other provisions of the law concerning assessments, objections and appeals be observed in respect of the appointment notice. It therefore behoves FIRS to: clearly state the tax liabilities in the appointment notices; indicate in the notices the right of objection; serve the notices directly on the taxable persons, not just on their FIRS-appointed agents; and allow the periods provided in the various laws for objection and appeal to run out before making any move for tax enforcement. Toeing a different route would amount to offending Section 36(1) of the constitution and indeed Section 31 (5) of the FIRS Act. It bears repeating that Section 31 of FIRS Act does not envisage the freezing of a taxable person's bank account since it does not suggest any circumstance of tax fraud or evasion which are the basis of fund freezing or confiscation in Section 8(1)(g) of the Act. Thus Section 8(1)(g) offers no statutory justification for the freezing of taxable persons' bank accounts.

Footnotes

* Senior Associate in ǼLEX.

1 Anxiety as FIRS Moves to 'manage' Defaulting Taxpayers' Bank Accounts. Businessday August 27, 2018.   https://www.businessdayonline.com/exclusives/article/anxiety-firs-moves-manage-defaulting-taxpayers-bank-accounts/. Accessed on 1 November 2018.

2 The term substitution is used in the marginal note to Section 31 of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act which provides for this process.

3  LCCI kicks against freezing tax defaulters' accounts. The Nation August 20, 2018.

http://thenationonlineng.net/lcci-kicks-against-freezing-tax-defaulters-accounts/. Accessed on 1 November 2018.

4 Before the enactment of the FIRS Act 2007 which established FIRS, the Companies Income Tax Act No. 22 of 1961 established the Federal Board of Inland Revenue.

5 Cap C21, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 (as amended in 2007).

6 Cap P8, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 (as amended in 2011).

7 See also Paragraph 3.0 of FIRS Information Circular No. 2005/03 on Preparation and Processing of Best of Judgment Assessment, released in February, 2006. The mode of a Best of Judgment assessment is discretionary, but in Nigerian Breweries Plc. v Lagos State Internal Revenue Board (2001) FWLR (Pt. 72) 1972, the Court of Appeal held that the revenue officer making the assessment should not be dishonest, vindictive; or capricious.

8 (2013) 10 TLRN 1.

9 (2016) 21 TLRN 73.

10 On the basis of this law, the court has consistently faulted restrictions on bank accounts without prior court order. See Chidolue v EFCC (2012) 5 NWLR (PT 1292). This relates to the established principle that the non-fulfilment of a prescribed condition precedent before doing an act renders the act null and void. See Aina V Jinadu (1992)4 NWLR (PT 233)91.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions