Nigeria: Bifurcation Of Contracts – A "Legal Kevlar" Against The Single Contracts Doctrine Of Taxation Of Non-Residents In Nigeria?

Last Updated: 4 May 2017
Article by Oyeyemi Oke

Introduction

Taxation of non-residents in Nigeria has been quite an interesting area of tax law considering the dynamism of commerce and increase in trans-border transactions by multinational enterprises ("MNEs"). Also, the recent tax drive by the Nigerian government to increase revenue in the wake of the slump in oil prices show how important this subject has become.

Globalisation of trade has seen businesses perform various parts of their activities and functions in different parts of the world in order to arrive at a single product. Reasons for adopting this model include: cost of labour, availability of skill, tax incentives to mention a few. For example, mobile phone devices are conceptualised and designed in the United States, the relevant software developed in India and the manufacturing done in China. Also, fashion houses carry out similar activities by having designs in Europe and production in Asia. This myriad of cross-border activities no doubt throw up concerns around the issue of taxation as MNEs find themselves facing Revenue Authorities of various jurisdiction in relation to a single product. Often, Revenue Authorities, want a slice of the pie through ensuring that the right taxes are paid in the jurisdictions were the relevant activities leading to the production of an item are carried out. However, MNEs potentially (and more often than not) face the risk of double taxation in these jurisdictions.

This has been a prevalent issue in Nigeria as the Federal Inland Revenue Service ("FIRS") in recent times has sought to capture within the tax net, all forms of activities leading to the creation of a product,notwithstanding the fact that some of the activities are not carried out in Nigeria.

The Nigerian single contract doctrine

Under the Nigerian Companies Income Tax Act ("CITA"), tax is chargeable upon the profits of any company accruing in, derived from, brought into, or received in, Nigeria. The CITA goes further to provide for a set of criteria where the profits of a non-Nigerian company shall be deemed to have been derived from Nigeria. These criteria include:

  1. Where the foreign company has a fixed base in Nigeria, the company is taxable in Nigeria to the extent that the profit is attributable to the fixed base;
  2. Where the foreign company does not have a fixed base in Nigeria but habitually operates a trade or business or habitually maintains a stock of goods or merchandize in Nigeria, the company is taxable in Nigeria to the extent that the profit is attributable to the business or trade carried on through that person;
  3. If the trade or business involves a single contract for surveys, deliveries, installations or construction;
  4. Related party transactions deemed to be artificial or fictitious;

Of particular interest is the third criterion through which the profits of a foreign company will be deemed to have been derived from Nigeria and thus chargeable to Nigerian income tax is where the profit of such a foreign company is derived from a single contract for surveys, deliveries, installation or construction, sometimes referred to as "turnkey contracts or projects".

Usually, turnkey contracts involve tripartite relationships (or more) documented in a single contract. The typical attitude of the FIRS is to treat such tripartite agreements as single and indivisible contracts notwithstanding the fact that such agreements are separate which specify the different obligations of the parties including the location in which those obligations are to be performed. This treatment brings the profit of the entire contract into the Nigerian tax net irrespective of the fact that certain aspects of the contract have been performed outside Nigeria.

This approach is a source of concern for MNE's who are involved in the production of an item of many parts which have been produced in various jurisdictions including Nigeria. The FIRS' interpretation of the Nigerian tax laws is to the effect that profits derived by a non-Nigerian company which has any form of Nigerian connection no matter how minute must be subject to Nigerian taxes.

Unfortunately, this approach by the FIRS was given credence by the Federal High Court in the case of Saipem Contracting Nigeria v. FIRS TLRN (Vol. 15), July 2014. In this case, Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company (SNEPCo) awarded a contract in a single document to Saipem Nigeria, Saipem Portugal and Saipem S.A. The contract was executed in Nigeria and the income from the contract emanated from SNEPCo in Nigeria. However, under the contract, certain obligations were to be performed in Portugal and France by Saipem Portugal and Saipem S.A. respectively and neither Saipem Protugal nor Saipem S.A. had any connection with Nigeria. They were merely to perform their respective obligations under the contract outside Nigeria and hand over the product to Saipem Nigeria for the installation and completion of the project in Nigeria. Yet, FIRS charged and assessed them to tax on the profit from the contract on the basis that it was a single contract whose profit was deemed to be derived from Nigeria. This assessment was unsuccessfully challenged by Saipem at the court of first instance, the Tax Appeal Tribunal ("TAT").

Saipem Portugal and Saipem S.A. went further on appeal at the Federal High Court to challenge their assessment to Nigerian income tax. These companies argued that despite being set out in one agreement, the agreement with SNEPCo was in substance a multiple contract for different obligations for which their respective portions of the profit was not derived from Nigeria. Their arguments were based on the following grounds:

  1. that the activities for which they were engaged was not within the Nigerian tax jurisdiction;
  2. the income for such activities are not derived from Nigeria, as no activity was carried out in Nigeria;
  3. the income from such activities did not accrue from activities in Nigeria;
  4. Payment was not to be received in Nigeria; nor
  5. The income from such activities was not to be brought into Nigeria

The Federal High Court however rejected the above arguments and held that the contract was a single contract emanating from Nigeria with the profit therefrom derived from Nigeria, and therefore taxable in Nigeria under Section 13(2) (c) of CITA. The court pronounced as follows:

"Both the 2nd and 3rd Plaintiffs [Saipem Portugal and Saipem S.A.] derived income from their global operations which are payable to their country of resident. They are only being taxed in Nigeria on the contract between them and the 3rd Defendant [SNEPCo] notwithstanding where the money is being paid or whether the money would be brought back to this country. All the necessaries leading to the contract execution and payment are made here in Nigeria. The companies derive their money in Nigeria and they are subject to pay tax on it subject to Nigeria [sic] tax law..."

The court's decision as stated above was based on the following:

  1. SNEPCo is a Nigerian entity, and the one that awarded the contract for works in Nigeria;
  2. the contract was executed in Nigeria; and
  3. the payment that emanated from SNEPCo in Nigeria, the profit of Saipem Portugal and Saipem S.A. are deemed to have been derived from Nigeria and therefore subject to tax in Nigeria.

The question that ordinarily comes to mind is that; would the court have reached a different decision if all the necessaries leading to the contract execution and payments were made outside Nigeria? Perhaps most likely. That said, the Saipem decision is worrisome as it has the potential of stifling international commercial transactions in Nigeria.

Also, taking a cursory look at the Saipem decision, one may wonder that the courts may be concerned with the form of the contracts and not necessarily the substance. What does this mean? Assuming the contract between the Saipem entities and SNEPCo were contained in different contracts evinced by two to three different agreements, there is the likelihood that the FIRS and the courts would have not been able to drag the Saipem S.A and Saipem Portugal under the single contract doctrine. This statement is made against the backdrop of the decision of the Federal High Court regarding execution of offshore contracts.

The Federal High Court, on 18 September 2015, in the case of JGC Corporation v. Federal Inland Revenue Service (2014) 15 TLRN decided that execution of offshore contracts is not subject to taxes. In this case, Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited (MPNU) entered into two separate contracts for the realisation of its EPC3 Bonny Terminal Project in Nigeria. ‎JGC executed the offshore contract while its local subsidiary in Nigeria, JGC Nigeria Limited alongside another company executed the onshore contract. The FIRS assessed JGC for income tax in Nigeria on the execution of the offshore contract. The TAT upheld the FIRS' decision. This decision of the TAT was however upturned by the Federal High Court on the basis that the TAT failed to recognise that there were two contracts (i.e. the offshore and onshore contracts).

This decision brings some hope as it shows that where elements of a contracts are divided into onshore and offshore elements and evinced by separate documents, the risk of such contract being caught under the single contract doctrine is mitigated. Whilst this may be the case, it is necessary to highlight that the decisions of Saipem and JGC are decisions by courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction as such there is no superiority. Therefore, a High Court "next door" is not necessarily bound by either decisions. That said, the TAT which has the bulk of tax dispute is bound by these decisions.

Is Bifurcation of Contracts a "Legal Kevlar" to the single contracts doctrine?

In answering this question, it may be necessary to speak to the meaning of "Kevlar". The Kevlar is a trademark brand name for a very strong artificial material that is not damaged by high temperatures. It is a synthetic fibre of high tensile strength used especially as a reinforcing agent in the manufacture of helmets and bulletproof vests.

Now to the question, "Is Bifurcation of Contracts a "Legal Kevlar" to the single contracts doctrine? In the opinion of the writer, Yes! It must be noted that just like the Kevlar, bifurcation is a reinforcing tool which can be utilized by a foreign company against the possibility of being captured under the Nigerian tax net as far as the single contract doctrine is concerned. However, one must be quick to add that bifurcation just like the Kevlar, is a reinforcement and may collapse (or give way) if defective. Consequently, it is advised that in the process of bifurcation, the relevant contract must be well structured and properly drafted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions