New Zealand: Australian Banking Royal Commission: interim report: one step closer to judgement day

Brief Counsel

Commissioner Kenneth Hayne has delivered his interim report on the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The report details the misconduct in the Australian financial services sector identified during the Commission's hearings; identifies the causes of that misconduct; examines the approach of the Australian regulatory authorities; and discusses the current Australian legislative, regulatory and policy framework.

This Brief Counsel is the first in a series focusing on the interim report. It provides a general overview of the report structure and content. Subsequent Brief Counsels will examine particular parts of the interim report, and the possible implications for New Zealand.

Relevance for NZ's financial service providers

Our financial service providers will be considering the interim report to assess whether they are vulnerable to the types of misconduct identified by the Commission and, if so, how they can address those vulnerabilities. That may involve them focusing on their remuneration structures, systems for detecting misconduct, and their complaints and remediation processes.

Regulators are expecting such a proactive approach. The FMA and Reserve Bank have stated they are watching the Commission, and are seeking assurances that the types of misconduct identified by the Commission have not occurred in New Zealand.

The interim report and the final report (when it is published) are likely to inform the legislative, regulatory and enforcement programmes in Australia for years to come.

Report overview

Since the Royal Commission began its public hearings in March, it has heard many examples of alleged misconduct in the Australian financial services industry. Much of that misconduct has captured the public's attention. For example:

  • a couple losing their home and life savings due to "improper advice" while the adviser received a hefty commission
  • banks charging advice fees for customers after they had been informed the customers had died
  • an ill and disabled elderly woman being signed-up as the guarantor for her daughter's business loan and losing her house as a result
  • a Down's Syndrome man being signed up over the telephone for significant insurance cover, and
  • cultural sensitivities being exploited to sell funeral insurance to Aboriginal people.

The report is comprehensive, comprising three volumes, and 1001 pages. It covers the misconduct considered during the first four rounds of public hearings, which focused on consumer lending, financial advice, small and medium enterprises and remote communities.

Due to Commission's time constraints, the report does not cover the recently completed rounds on superannuation and insurance, but these topics will be addressed in the final report.

Commissioner's conclusions

In the Executive Summary, the Commissioner concludes that the misconduct is indicative of systemic problems in the Australian financial services industry and in the regulatory enforcement. On the question of why the misconduct occurred, the Commissioner stated: "Too often, the answer seems to be greed – the pursuit of short term profit at the expense of basic standards of honesty. How else is charging continuing advice fees to the dead to be explained? But it is necessary then to go behind the particular events and ask how and why they came about.

"Banks, and all financial services entities recognised that they sold services and products. Selling became their focus of attention. Too often it became the sole focus of attention. Products and services multiplied. Banks searched for their 'share of the customer's wallet'. From the executive suite to the front line, staff were measured and rewarded by reference to profit and sales."

The Commissioner was equally critical of the Australian regulatory authorities (ASIC and APRA) in failing to seek public denunciation of, and punishment for, the misconduct. He criticised their failure to undertake court action in order to have penalties imposed.

Instead, ASIC and APRA had relied on infringement notices and enforceable undertakings that did not impose sanctions commensurate with the misconduct's seriousness. In some instances, the misconduct simply went unpunished.

The report does not propose any specific reforms on how to prevent misconduct happening again. Instead the Commissioner identifies various questions he needs to resolve in order to reach his reform recommendations.

The Commissioner left open questions of whether additional laws should be enacted, whether the law should be simplified, or whether the existing law should be administered or enforced differently. This reflects that much of the misconduct appears to be already contrary to law. The Commissioner therefore recognised that there might be little benefit in new laws being enacted. Rather, the better approach might be to simplify the existing laws.

The questions will provide the framework for the final round of public hearings, where the Commission will consider policy matters. After this round is completed, the Commissioner will formulate his final conclusions and substantive recommendations, which will be contained in the final report.

Likely outcomes

While the Commissioner did not propose any specific reforms, it appears, at the very least from the report, he will recommend changes relating to:

  • Remuneration systems – the Commissioner concludes that in all cases of misconduct identified by the Commission, the financial services provider financially benefited from the misconduct. The Commissioner considers that industry members have not been rewarded for doing the "right thing". He also considers that advisers should not earn commissions, as these mean that the adviser's interests will always conflict with the client's interests. The Commissioner questions whether such commissions are commercially necessary, given that some banks had ended them.
  • Governance and management structures – the Commissioner concludes that in all the cases of unlawful conduct identified by the Commission, governance and management structures had been inadequate to detect that unlawful conduct. In addition, where that conduct was eventually discovered, there were often few, if any, consequences for the individuals responsible, the remediation was typically unsatisfactory, and regulatory authorities were not notified promptly.
  • Intermediaries engaged by financial services providers – the Commissioner noted that there was confusion as to their roles, their relationships with customers and financial service providers, and their legal responsibilities, especially with respect to assessing the product suitability for each consumer.

The Commission has been embarrassing for ASIC and APRA. These agencies will want to regain the confidence of the public and politicians, so it will be expected that they will take a firmer enforcement approach. ASIC has stated that it will take a "more intrusive, enduring, and with onsite visits, more physical" approach to supervision as a result of the Commission's findings.

The interim report has been embarrassing for the Australian Government as well. Senior government members had resisted earlier attempts for an inquiry into the industry, claiming it to be unnecessary and unproductive. The Labor Party has begun a campaign to have the Commission extended, as the Commissioner had earlier stated that time constraints had meant that not all the witnesses had been heard. It has also promised that, if elected, it will set up a taskforce (located within the Federal Treasury) that will implement the Commission's recommendations.

Chapman Tripp comment

The interim report has been described by Australian commentators and politicians as a "day of shame", a "game-changer" and a "frank and scathing assessment". It has been recognised as comprehensive and tough. However, when the dust settles, the report's allegations of industry-wide greed may be seen as too extreme. It may also be acknowledged that the industry generally provides considerable financial benefit to its customers. For every case of misconduct identified, there will be many thousands of cases where customers have been provided with the financial services they require on reasonable commercial terms.

We hope this is not lost sight of when the Commission makes its recommendations – that any proposed reforms need to be a proportionate responses, and not unduly interfere with the industry's ability to meet market demand for financial products and services.

The report does not extensively analyse the competing policy considerations that any reform in this area must negotiate. This will occur in the final round of public hearings, and it is here that the Commission will need to address some difficult issues. For example:

  • The report suggests that the Commission will recommend reforms that place greater emphasis on customers' interests. The Commissioner considers that the misconduct cited shows that financial services providers have failed to adequately manage customers' interests and that they will inherently prefer their own interests in the event of a conflict. While the report briefly acknowledges financial services providers' are profit-motivated businesses, it does not provide much conceptual thinking as to how the interests of the customers and the financial services provider should be more satisfactorily balanced than currently happens. The Commission will need to ensure that desirable customer services do not become uneconomic as a result of any changes. As much as this may seem heretical in the current climate, there may be cases where customers would prefer to determine what is in their own subjective best interests and place value on choice, rather than to losing opportunities out of an abundance of protectionism.
  • The report focuses mainly on the financial advice misconduct, which was often pronounced as clearly unethical or unlawful. However, in the rounds that considered small-medium business and agricultural lending, the alleged misconduct was often less clear cut. In these rounds, the Commission heard complaints about banks' lending decisions with respect to customers who were willing to accept that lending. Arguably, the complaints were primarily related to the banks' commercial judgement, and their exercise of legal remedies when the commercial ventures failed or were in jeopardy, as they were about breaches of rules. Any reforms in these areas will need to recognise that commercial ventures will often fail; that lenders need to be able to respond prudently; that to some extent customers should be expected to look after their own interests and exercise discernment about their borrowing; and that banks will withhold lending in such cases where they consider they cannot enforce their legal rights under lending arrangements. The report contains little substantive analysis on these matters.
  • The Commission needs to be realistic about what can be achieved through regulatory reform. The Australian industry's size, the complexity of financial service providers' organisations and of their regulatory requirements and, most importantly, human nature and ingenuity, mean that the prevention of all misconduct may be practically unachievable, even with the best governance, culture and regulatory frameworks. In reaching its recommendations, the Commission should recognise that there are limits to what management can reasonably know and influence. Again, the report does not appear to adequately acknowledge these realities. Hopefully, if the Commission recommends greater sanctions for misconduct, these sanctions distinguish between simple mistakes or misconduct due to poor implementation by "bad apples", from misconduct arising from systemic failures that should reasonably have been prevented.

The report identifies the possibility that improper behaviour is best remedied under existing frameworks with greater enforcement, without the need for regulatory overhaul and the adverse economic consequences that may arise if it goes too far. We expect that such a conclusion would ultimately be a good outcome for the Australian financial services industry and for consumers generally. In our view, however, effective remediation of customers should take priority over imposing penalties. While both are punitive and incentivise compliance, consumers benefit directly from remediation. For that reason, requiring engagement with, rather than enforcement by, regulators may still lead to the best overall outcomes.

Next steps

The Commission has invited submissions on the questions identified in the interim report. Submissions close on 26 October 2018.

Subject to the Commission being extended, the final report is required to be delivered by 1 February 2019.

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Penny Sheerin
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions