New Zealand: Employment Law Bulletin — [2007] ELB 116

Disability And Discrimination — The Employer’s Duty To Accommodate

As a major proponent and one of the first signatories to the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, New Zealand has recognised the need to do more to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability and to ensure that reasonable accommodation is provided to persons with disabilities in the workplace. Although our domestic law has long provided for these matters, the extent to which it does so is virtually untested.

Discrimination in the employment setting is prohibited by both the Employment Relations Act 2000 ("ERA") and the Human Rights Act 1993 ("HRA"). An employee who is subjected to unjustified treatment by reason of discrimination may pursue a remedy under either Act. A job seeker who is rejected as a result of unlawful discrimination will have to rely on the HRA, no employment relationship having been created.1

Among the prohibited grounds of discrimination is disability, defined in s 21(1) of the HRA to include: physical and psychiatric illness; physical, intellectual or physiological impairment; any other abnormality of psychological, physiological or anatomical structure or function; reliance on remedial means such as a wheelchair or guide dog, and the presence in the body of organisms capable of causing illness. The definition also contemplates that the affliction will be of a permanent or at least long-term nature.2

The prohibition is not, however, an absolute bar to discriminatory treatment. Section 106 of the ERA imports s 29 of the HRA to provide that nothing in s 104 of the ERA, prohibiting discrimination, prevents different treatment based on disability if either of two situations exists.

The first is where the employment position is such that the person could perform the duties satisfactorily only with the aid of special services or facilities which it is not reasonable to expect the employer to provide.

The second is where the person could only perform them at the risk of causing harm to themselves or others and it is not reasonable either to take the risk or to take measures to reduce it to a normal level.

Section 29 accordingly imposes a duty on employers to accommodate a disabled employee's special needs by providing special services or facilities and/or by taking steps to reduce any associated risk of harm, but only to the extent it is reasonable to expect them to do so.

Just how the reasonableness of an employer’s actions and the circumstances in which different treatment will be justified are to be assessed for these purposes is not at all clear. The Acts themselves provide no guidance as to the factors that should be taken into account and the terms "services" and "facilities" are undefined.

Section 29 has seldom been considered in either the employment or human rights jurisdictions. In particular the extent of the legal obligation to provide special services or facilities, in the absence of risk, has yet to be considered in a reported decision. This is perhaps surprising; given the 413,200 New Zealanders aged 15 to 64 who reported some form of disability in the 2001 census, and indications that half of them required assistance as a result.

An explanation may lie in the mediation model pursued by the Human Rights Commission, which will investigate and settle claims at no cost to the complainant — but other factors are surely at play. It may be that people with disabilities are unaware of any real duty to accommodate their needs, or are simply reluctant to challenge those who discriminate against them. Employers and employees alike may be doubtful that an obligation imposed in such a roundabout manner — as a qualification to an exception to a general prohibition — is even likely to be enforced.

Case law does establish that the risk of harm to the employee will justify discrimination on the basis of disability where that risk is "significant, appreciable or substantial" and it is "not really possible or reasonable" to expect the employer to take the steps that are required to reduce it.3 The acceptable level of risk is accordingly not high, which is consistent with normal health and safety requirements.

When called on to apply the other anti-discrimination provisions of the HRA the courts have consistently referred to the Act's special character and the need to give it a fair, large and liberal interpretation, rather than a literal or technical one. In Director of Human Rights Proceedings v NZ Thoroughbred Racing Inc4 the majority of the Court of Appeal held that its savings provisions, being exceptions to the basic prohibitions on discriminatory action, are to be read narrowly. This should be read as requiring a fair, large and liberal interpretation of the employer’s duty to accommodate, which itself serves to narrow the exceptions provided by s 29.

The issues surrounding the duty to accommodate have been and continue to be extensively litigated in other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States of America and Australia. Given the common purpose of human rights law internationally, it may be expected that authorities in those jurisdictions will be of some assistance to the New Zealand courts when called upon to decide whether or not s 29 should be applied in a particular case to excuse discriminatory treatment based on disability.

The United Kingdom’s Disability Discrimination Act 1995 ("DDA") is instructive in that it sets out the factors which must be taken into account when deciding whether or not it is reasonable to expect particular steps to be taken in any case:

[18B Reasonable adjustments: supplementary

  1. In determining whether it is reasonable for a person to have to take a particular step in order to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments, regard shall be had, in particular, to —

  1. the extent to which taking the step would prevent the effect in relation to which the duty is imposed;
  2. the extent to which it is practicable for him to take the step;
  3. the financial and other costs which would be incurred by him in taking the step and the extent to which taking it would disrupt any of his activities;
  4. the extent of his financial and other resources;
  5. the availability to him of financial or other assistance with respect to taking the step;
  6. the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking;
  7. where the step would be taken in relation to a private household, the extent to which taking it would

  1. disrupt that household, or
  2. disturb any person residing there.

The Act also provides examples of the kinds of adjustments an employer might reasonably be required to make:

  1. The following are examples of steps which a person may need to take in relation to a disabled person in order to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments —

  1. making adjustments to premises;
  2. allocating some of the disabled person's duties to another person;transferring him to fill an existing vacancy;
  3. altering his hours of working or training;
  4. assigning him to a different place of work or training;
  5. allowing him to be absent during working or training hours for rehabilitation, assessment or treatment;
  6. giving, or arranging for, training or mentoring (whether for the disabled person or any other person);
  7. acquiring or modifying equipment;
  8. modifying instructions or reference manuals;
  9. modifying procedures for testing or assessment;
  10. providing a reader or interpreter;
  11. providing supervision or other support.

The Act also provides that a breach of the above provisions is not itself actionable, being applicable only for the purpose of determining whether a disabled person has been discriminated against.

Under the DDA the duty to make reasonable adjustments arises in all employment situations where less favourable treatment could arise as a result of a disability. The need then is firstly to establish what accommodation is required by the legal duty and secondly whether, if that was met, there would still be a relevant and substantial reason for treating the disabled person differently to others. As Lord Rodger of Earlsferry put it in the leading case of Archibald v Fife Council:5

In broad terms, the idea is that, if an employer leaves a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage from his arrangements, when he should have taken steps to shield her from that disadvantage, he discriminates against her.

In that case an employee had become disabled in a way that made it impossible for her to carry out the essential functions of her job as a road sweeper, namely walking and sweeping. After retraining her for an office job and considering (but declining) her applications for suitable vacancies as they arose, the Council eventually dismissed her on the grounds she was unable to perform the duties of her position. Mrs Archibald complained that it should not have made her compete for a suitable office job, which the Council believed it had to do by virtue of other legislation. In its view, her dismissal was the result of her inability to carry out the essential functions of the job she had been hired for, which was not something it could change by making reasonable adjustments. That view prevailed all the way to the House of Lords, which allowed Mrs Archibald’s appeal.

This marks a step beyond the rejection of discrimination per se and towards positive discrimination in favour of the disabled employee. As Baroness Hale of Richmond explained, the law does not regard the differences between able and disabled people as irrelevant in the sense that sex or race is treated as irrelevant when deciding whether someone has been discriminated against on those grounds.

Treating someone more favourably on the basis of their sex or race is prohibited because doing so necessarily discriminates against people of the opposite sex or a different race, who should be treated equally. By contrast, the DDA expects reasonable adjustments to be made to cater for the special needs of disabled people, which necessarily entails an element of more favourable treatment. The question before the House was: when the obligation to make those adjustments arises, and how far it goes?

Their lordships held that Mrs Archibald’s employment contract included, as part of the employer’s arrangements, an implied term that she was liable to be dismissed if she became unable to carry out the essential functions of the job for which she was employed.

The question then became whether that aspect of the employment arrangement placed Mrs Archibald at a substantial disadvantage compared to other employees who were not disabled, but who were subject to the same arrangements. Clearly it did, as they were not unable to do their jobs and hence not liable to be dismissed.

Because the Act imposed a duty to prevent that term of her employment contract from placing her at that substantial disadvantage, the Council may well have been obliged to simply put her into another job that she could do (as a reasonable accommodation), rather than merely giving her the opportunity to apply for it and appointing her if her application was successful. Whether or not that obligation arose would depend on what was reasonable in all the circumstances of the case, which was a matter for the Employment Tribunal to decide.

New Zealand's prohibition of discrimination against disabled persons in the employment setting is expressed in extremely simple terms by comparison to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (UK), but many of the complex questions that have arisen under that Act underlie any consideration of discrimination by reason of disability and what should reasonably be expected by way of accommodation.

What is the correct comparator group to be used when deciding whether different treatment has occurred by reason of disability?6 This issue is addressed, however, in s 22(1)(c) HRA by its references to "other employees employed on work of that description". Can disadvantage or dismissal by reason of disability be substantively justified even when unreasonable?7 Is reasonableness to be assessed from the perspective of the employer, the employee, or on an entirely objective basis?8

Although specific legislation may be expected to eventually flow from New Zealand’s acceptance of the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the obligation to give effect to its purposes already exists. Given the breadth of the definition of disability in the HRA, it is perhaps surprising that the duty to accommodate disabled employees remains so unexplored.


1 John Hughes "Editorial: Challenging discrimination" [2006] ELB 125.

2 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [2004] 1 ERNZ 614; (2004) 2 NZELR 157.

3 Proceedings Commissioner and Canterbury Frozen Meat Co Ltd (CRT, Decision No 19-98 CRT14-98, 26 November 1998, SC Bathgate, Chairperson, MK Shields and WL Dearsley, Members).

4 Director of Human Rights Proceedings v NZ Thoroughbred Racing Inc [2002] 3 NZLR 333.

5 Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32; [2004] IRLR 651; [2004] 4 All ER 303.

6 Smith v Churchill Lifts Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 1220; [2006] ICR 524; [2006] IRLR 41.

7 Collins v Royal National Theatre Board [2004] EWCA Civ 144; [2004] 2 All ER 851.

8 Collins v Royal National Theatre Board, as above.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions