New Zealand: Court Case About Radiation From Power Lines

Are you worried about radiation from power lines? Margo Perpick discusses a recent case arising from the erection of new power lines after the 1998 power crisis in Auckland. Margo is a partner at the Christchurch Lawlink firm of Wynn Williams & Co. and specialises in civil litigation and resource management law. She has acted in a number of cases involving electromagnetic radiation. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering, as well as a Bachelor of Laws (Honours).

The recent decision of the High Court in Varnier v Vector Energy Ltd (CP 82/99, Salmon J, 16/3/2000) serves as a reminder that a resource consent issued under the Resource Management Act 1991 does not necessarily entitle the holder to create a nuisance or commit a negligent act or a trespass.

What Was The Case About?

The case involved an overhead electricity line erected in Parnell, Auckland by Vector Energy following the widespread power failures in the Auckland CBD in 1998. Mr Varnier and Miss Ravel (the plaintiffs) owned property close to the electricity line. The line emitted electromagnetic radiation (EMR). The plaintiffs alleged that the EMR from the line caused them to suffer headaches and general unwellness, and also caused interference with electronic equipment in the house (such as TV, phone, and computers).

Vector believed that the plaintiffs’ claims would not succeed in court, so it asked the High Court to reject the claims "summarily", thereby avoiding the need to go through a detailed court hearing whose result would be a foregone conclusion. The High Court did not agree with Vector.

Who Said What?

Vector produced evidence from a scientist from the National Radiation Laboratory that the magnetic fields on the plaintiffs’ property were significantly below internationally accepted levels of exposure. This witness said that measurements showed that the EMR emissions were 22 to 500 times lower than international guidelines. He had measured the range of emissions as between 0.2 and 4.5 microtesla, whereas the international guideline is 100 microtesla. This scientific witness also said that the current body of scientific evidence shows that magnetic fields at those levels do not cause an adverse effect on human health.

However, the plaintiffs said that Miss Ravel had lived at the property after the erection of the line, and during that time had experienced severe headaches and nausea. She had not suffered these effects before or after living at the property. She also said that it was impossible to watch TV or use a computer because the screen would flicker.

There was also evidence from two other people who had lived in the property, or visited it for short periods. They said that they also suffered from headaches and nausea. The plaintiffs also filed scientific evidence. The level of EMR normally found in a typical home is 0.02 to 0.05 microtesla in a bedroom or living area, and up to 1.5 microtesla in a kitchen up to a metre from a stove or microwave oven whilst in use. This suggested that the EMR levels in the property were up to 100 times greater than could be expected in the bedroom or living areas of a home. This evidence also included that the most common effects from living or working in electromagnetic fields in excess of 0.5 microtesla are headaches and the lowering of the body’s natural immune response.

The court was not hearing the substantive claims. At this stage, it was limited to deciding whether the claims should be defeated before getting the opportunity to go to a full hearing. For that reason, the court was not in a position to make any findings as to which evidence it found most persuasive.

The court acknowledged that apparently well-qualified people had quite different views about the likely effect of the emissions from the electricity lines.

One of the issues raised by Vector Energy was that the emissions complained of had been the subject of full consideration during a resource consent hearing, and that the plaintiffs had made a submission on the matter at the time. Before the electricity line had been erected, Vector Energy had obtained a resource consent. There was no suggestion that Vector had not complied with the resource consent conditions.

Vector said that the consent process involved assessing the environmental effects of the line and directly considering the plaintiffs’ submissions that the EMR emissions were a risk to health. The plaintiffs’ submissions at the resource consent hearing were the same as those advanced in its proceedings in the High Court. The plaintiffs had the right to appeal to the Environment Court, but had chosen not to do so.

Justice Salmon said that he could not accept that argument. He said that the matters for consideration under the Resource Management Act are quite different from those which the High Court would be required to consider if the proceedings were to continue.

His Honour pointed out that compliance with that act does not remove the need to comply with other applicable laws, regulations, bylaws. He said that it is clear that a resource consent is not intended to remove the right to sue in relation to effects arising from implementing a consent, at least as far as they affect people’s health.

Justice Salmon pointed out that it was not the supply of electricity itself which was the subject of the plaintiffs’ complaint. Nor was it the physical presence of the poles and the lines carrying that supply. Those matters were clearly permitted by the resource consent. The subject of the plaintiffs’ complaint was the EMR emissions, and Vector Energy had not shown that those emissions were the inevitable consequence of the activity which had been authorised. This high standard of proof is appropriate only on a strike out application or an application for judgment preliminary to trial. When the matter comes to trial, the plaintiff will need to prove, on the lesser standard of the balance of probabilities, that the EMR emissions caused the matters of which they have complained and that these matters constitute a nuisance at law.


The result of this decision is that there will be a substantive hearing of the plaintiffs’ claims. The court will have to decide whether the evidence proves that it is more probable than not that the EMR emissions have caused loss to the plaintiffs, and if so, whether that loss can be recovered from Vector Energy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions