New Zealand: Supreme Court Upholds Council’s Appeal On Roading And Subdivisions

Last Updated: 9 April 2007
Article by Melanie Gordon

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Waitakere City Council v Estate Homes Limited [2006] NZSC 112 has clarified the law relating to subdivision consent conditions that require the provision of public infrastructure. The decision overturns an earlier judgment of the Court of Appeal ([2006] 2 NZLR 619) and contains some important comments on the scope of Environment Court appeals and the lawfulness of consent conditions generally.

The background to the case involved a proposed subdivision by Estate Homes Ltd (Estate Homes) that included the construction of an arterial road along the path of a longstanding designation. Waitakere City Council’s (Council’s) normal policy was to require applicants for subdivision consent to undertake the construction of designated roads as part of the subdivision process. In such situations, the Council would typically pay compensation to developers to the extent that the road was not necessary for the purposes of the particular development. In light of this policy, Estate Homes’ consent application sought compensation for the difference between the cost of constructing a local road (which was arguably required to serve the subdivision) and an arterial road (which was the higher capacity road demanded by the Council under the designation).

The Council ultimately granted subdivision consent to Estate Homes. The consent was issued subject to a condition requiring the road to be vested in the Council and stating that the amount of compensation would be the difference between the construction of an arterial road and a collector road. Estate Homes appealed against that condition, which resulted in a much smaller compensation payment, and the matter proceeded on appeal through the Courts.

The main issues for the Supreme Court were:

  • identification of the statutory basis for the Council to require the road to be constructed; and
  • what entitlements to compensation this gave rise to.

Statutory basis for roading requirements

The majority of the Court of Appeal had held that by imposing the condition noted above, the Council effectively ‘acquired’ the land under s322(2) of the Local Government Act 1974. On that basis, the majority reasoned that the Council was required to fully compensate Estate Homes for the ‘taking’, due to associated provisions in the Local Government Act 1974 that invoked the Public Works Act 1981.

The Supreme Court disagreed. It held that the legal presumption of compensation only applies if there is actually a taking of land. It held that ‘if a lawful condition to a subdivision consent requires the giving up of land in exchange for the right to subdivide, no expropriation or taking will be involved’. This was because a ‘taking’ involves a forced acquisition of land which a landowner must submit to. In contrast, the Supreme Court considered that in the subdivision context a landowner can always decide whether ‘the right to subdivide will be bought too dearly at the price of complying with the conditions’. The Court therefore held that the Council’s requirement was not a ‘taking of property’ giving rise to a statutory requirement to pay compensation.

The Supreme Court then went on to state that (contrary to the Court of Appeal’s view) s108(2)(c) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) directly empowered the Council to impose the condition it did. This was because the phrase ‘services or works’ in s108(2)(c) clearly included construction of the road, which formed part of the consent application.

Lawfulness of conditions

Having decided that the condition was imposed under section 108(2)(c) of the RMA, the Supreme Court then addressed whether the condition satisfied the standard common law requirements for consent conditions.

In doing so, the Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal’s view that there must be a ‘causal link between conditions and the effects of the proposed subdivision’. In contrast, the Supreme Court stated that there is no requirement that conditions of consent must only be imposed to ameliorate the effects of a proposed development. Rather, the relevant test is that there be a logical connection between the proposed development and any conditions of consent. The Supreme Court’s decision makes it clear that this connection does not have to relate to the effects of the proposed development.

Scope of appeals to the Environment Court

The Court also commented on the Environment Court’s ability to permit an increase in an applicant’s claim for compensation through the appeal process. This issue was relevant because Estate Homes’ original application to the Council sought only compensation for the extra costs associated with constructing an arterial road, over and above that of a local road. However, on appeal Estate Homes contended that it was entitled to compensation for the entire cost of construction and the value of all the land that was to be vested in the Council.

The Court of Appeal had held that it would be unfair to prevent Estate Homes from seeking full compensation on appeal, when the form of its application had been heavily influenced by what Council officers had indicated would be in line with Council policy. However, the Supreme Court was clear to point out that while the Environment Court may permit the party which applied for consent to amend its application, it may not do so to such an extent that the matter before it becomes, in substance, a different application.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Council was prejudiced by the course that was taken. In stating in its consent decision the basis on which it was prepared to pay compensation, the Council exposed itself to an appeal to the Environment Court on the ground that the compensation offered was insufficient to make its requirement of construction of the road to an arterial standard a reasonable one. The Council had therefore assumed the risk that the Environment Court would decide that additional compensation, on the basis originally sought by Estate Homes, was necessary. However, the Council did not put itself at risk of the amount of compensation being at large before the Environment Court. For that reason, the Supreme Court determined that the Environment Court should not have allowed Estate Homes’ appeal to depart so significantly from the compensation it was seeking through its original application.

Reminders for Councils and developers

The case highlights the potential difficulties that can occur when public infrastructure requirements are imposed, and the amount of compensation determined, via consent conditions. The most significant problem is that conditions of this nature can be re-opened by the Environment Court on appeal and the level of compensation adjusted (to the disadvantage of at least one of the parties).

As a way of avoiding this pitfall, the Supreme Court notes that both councils and developers may wish to consider the prospect of entering private side agreements to undertake certain work, and where necessary, to provide additional land for an agreed amount of compensation. If executed in advance of a formal application for consent, such agreements would be removed from the jurisdiction of the Environment Court on any appeal against a Council’s decision. This approach would dispense with the need for Councils to take the risk that their consent conditions are invalid, in terms of administrative law standards, if the compensation stipulated in the conditions is inadequate. It would also avoid the dilemma of Councils being committed to payment for items of infrastructure, when the price can be altered by the Environment Court in accordance with its view of what is adequate.

The Supreme Court also cautioned developers about strategically structuring consent applications to reflect Councils’ policies. The Court recommended that developers should apply for consent in terms that they consider suitable. If the Council then grants the consent subject to conditions, and the developer wishes to take issue with those conditions, the appeal process can be invoked. The Court cautioned that matters may become needlessly complicated if, as in this case, an applicant attempts to challenge conditions of consent on the basis of what it would have applied for, had it not been concerned to comply with advice given by Council officers. While the problem of delay may tempt applicants to act in a strategic way in order to expedite the process, the case makes it clear that this will not provide a justification for seeking to re-work the scope of a consent application at the appeal stage.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions