New Zealand: Supreme Court Upholds Council’s Appeal On Roading And Subdivisions

Last Updated: 9 April 2007
Article by Melanie Gordon

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Waitakere City Council v Estate Homes Limited [2006] NZSC 112 has clarified the law relating to subdivision consent conditions that require the provision of public infrastructure. The decision overturns an earlier judgment of the Court of Appeal ([2006] 2 NZLR 619) and contains some important comments on the scope of Environment Court appeals and the lawfulness of consent conditions generally.

The background to the case involved a proposed subdivision by Estate Homes Ltd (Estate Homes) that included the construction of an arterial road along the path of a longstanding designation. Waitakere City Council’s (Council’s) normal policy was to require applicants for subdivision consent to undertake the construction of designated roads as part of the subdivision process. In such situations, the Council would typically pay compensation to developers to the extent that the road was not necessary for the purposes of the particular development. In light of this policy, Estate Homes’ consent application sought compensation for the difference between the cost of constructing a local road (which was arguably required to serve the subdivision) and an arterial road (which was the higher capacity road demanded by the Council under the designation).

The Council ultimately granted subdivision consent to Estate Homes. The consent was issued subject to a condition requiring the road to be vested in the Council and stating that the amount of compensation would be the difference between the construction of an arterial road and a collector road. Estate Homes appealed against that condition, which resulted in a much smaller compensation payment, and the matter proceeded on appeal through the Courts.

The main issues for the Supreme Court were:

  • identification of the statutory basis for the Council to require the road to be constructed; and
  • what entitlements to compensation this gave rise to.

Statutory basis for roading requirements

The majority of the Court of Appeal had held that by imposing the condition noted above, the Council effectively ‘acquired’ the land under s322(2) of the Local Government Act 1974. On that basis, the majority reasoned that the Council was required to fully compensate Estate Homes for the ‘taking’, due to associated provisions in the Local Government Act 1974 that invoked the Public Works Act 1981.

The Supreme Court disagreed. It held that the legal presumption of compensation only applies if there is actually a taking of land. It held that ‘if a lawful condition to a subdivision consent requires the giving up of land in exchange for the right to subdivide, no expropriation or taking will be involved’. This was because a ‘taking’ involves a forced acquisition of land which a landowner must submit to. In contrast, the Supreme Court considered that in the subdivision context a landowner can always decide whether ‘the right to subdivide will be bought too dearly at the price of complying with the conditions’. The Court therefore held that the Council’s requirement was not a ‘taking of property’ giving rise to a statutory requirement to pay compensation.

The Supreme Court then went on to state that (contrary to the Court of Appeal’s view) s108(2)(c) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) directly empowered the Council to impose the condition it did. This was because the phrase ‘services or works’ in s108(2)(c) clearly included construction of the road, which formed part of the consent application.

Lawfulness of conditions

Having decided that the condition was imposed under section 108(2)(c) of the RMA, the Supreme Court then addressed whether the condition satisfied the standard common law requirements for consent conditions.

In doing so, the Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal’s view that there must be a ‘causal link between conditions and the effects of the proposed subdivision’. In contrast, the Supreme Court stated that there is no requirement that conditions of consent must only be imposed to ameliorate the effects of a proposed development. Rather, the relevant test is that there be a logical connection between the proposed development and any conditions of consent. The Supreme Court’s decision makes it clear that this connection does not have to relate to the effects of the proposed development.

Scope of appeals to the Environment Court

The Court also commented on the Environment Court’s ability to permit an increase in an applicant’s claim for compensation through the appeal process. This issue was relevant because Estate Homes’ original application to the Council sought only compensation for the extra costs associated with constructing an arterial road, over and above that of a local road. However, on appeal Estate Homes contended that it was entitled to compensation for the entire cost of construction and the value of all the land that was to be vested in the Council.

The Court of Appeal had held that it would be unfair to prevent Estate Homes from seeking full compensation on appeal, when the form of its application had been heavily influenced by what Council officers had indicated would be in line with Council policy. However, the Supreme Court was clear to point out that while the Environment Court may permit the party which applied for consent to amend its application, it may not do so to such an extent that the matter before it becomes, in substance, a different application.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Council was prejudiced by the course that was taken. In stating in its consent decision the basis on which it was prepared to pay compensation, the Council exposed itself to an appeal to the Environment Court on the ground that the compensation offered was insufficient to make its requirement of construction of the road to an arterial standard a reasonable one. The Council had therefore assumed the risk that the Environment Court would decide that additional compensation, on the basis originally sought by Estate Homes, was necessary. However, the Council did not put itself at risk of the amount of compensation being at large before the Environment Court. For that reason, the Supreme Court determined that the Environment Court should not have allowed Estate Homes’ appeal to depart so significantly from the compensation it was seeking through its original application.

Reminders for Councils and developers

The case highlights the potential difficulties that can occur when public infrastructure requirements are imposed, and the amount of compensation determined, via consent conditions. The most significant problem is that conditions of this nature can be re-opened by the Environment Court on appeal and the level of compensation adjusted (to the disadvantage of at least one of the parties).

As a way of avoiding this pitfall, the Supreme Court notes that both councils and developers may wish to consider the prospect of entering private side agreements to undertake certain work, and where necessary, to provide additional land for an agreed amount of compensation. If executed in advance of a formal application for consent, such agreements would be removed from the jurisdiction of the Environment Court on any appeal against a Council’s decision. This approach would dispense with the need for Councils to take the risk that their consent conditions are invalid, in terms of administrative law standards, if the compensation stipulated in the conditions is inadequate. It would also avoid the dilemma of Councils being committed to payment for items of infrastructure, when the price can be altered by the Environment Court in accordance with its view of what is adequate.

The Supreme Court also cautioned developers about strategically structuring consent applications to reflect Councils’ policies. The Court recommended that developers should apply for consent in terms that they consider suitable. If the Council then grants the consent subject to conditions, and the developer wishes to take issue with those conditions, the appeal process can be invoked. The Court cautioned that matters may become needlessly complicated if, as in this case, an applicant attempts to challenge conditions of consent on the basis of what it would have applied for, had it not been concerned to comply with advice given by Council officers. While the problem of delay may tempt applicants to act in a strategic way in order to expedite the process, the case makes it clear that this will not provide a justification for seeking to re-work the scope of a consent application at the appeal stage.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.