New Zealand: Judgment summary: Kane Bruce Parkin v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd: repair of earthquake damage

Last Updated: 3 August 2015
Article by Helen Smith

Kane Bruce Parkin v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZHC 1675

Mr Parkin owns a house in Lyttelton, which was damaged in the Canterbury earthquakes.  At the time of the earthquakes the house was nearly new, having been built in March 2009.

As a result of the earthquakes, the house was briefly red-stickered, prohibiting occupation, and the initial land-zoning was white, requiring further review.  The house remained in the white zone until May 2012, when it was rezoned as green.

Vero arranged an initial assessment of the house in March 2011, after which it determined that the house could be repaired.  EQC's assessment in July 2011 produced a scope of works with a much higher cost of repair, raising the question of whether the house was a rebuild.  However, a further assessment by Vero confirmed that the house was a repair, and in October 2011 EQC settled with Mr Parkin based on Vero's report. 

Vero advised Mr Parkin that they were unable to complete a final scope of works for the repairs until the house was rezoned, as there was a possibility that either the property would be red zoned or that specific foundations would be required.  Mr Parkin was unhappy about the delay in progressing the claim, and appeared to be of the view that the house should be rebuilt, because of EQC's assessment.

After the property was green zoned Mr Parkin suggested obtaining a preliminary report from an engineering expert.  Vero's response was that its next step was for a full reinstatement scope, and that while an engineer's report may be needed later, it was premature at that stage.  Mr Parkin then advised Vero that he would obtain his own report.  He then issued this claim against Vero.

The main issues for the High Court to determine in this case were:

  • who had responsibility for and control of the reinstatement strategy;
  • whether Vero breached the implied term of good faith or the Fair Insurance Code;
  • what is the standard of repair required; and
  • whether Mr Parkin is entitled to an award of general damages.

Responsibility and control of the reinstatement strategy

The insurance policy provides that:

"We will insure you for Accidental loss or damage to your home at the situation shown on the schedule during the period of cover.
What we will pay – at our option
  1. the cost incurred in rebuilding or repairing the damaged portion of the home using currently equivalent building materials and techniques to a standard or specification no more extensive, nor better than its condition when new; or

  2. the indemnity value should you not rebuild or repair within 12 months unless we agree to extend the time period."

Justice Mander said that:

"The policy is clear on its face.  The insured, Mr Parkin, must actually incur the costs of remediating his property before Vero's obligation as the insurer is triggered to pay the replacement sum.  In the absence of Vero opting to pay the indemnity value as provided in the policy as the second of two options available to it after the elapse of 12 months, there is no entitlement on the part of Mr Parkin to a cash payment upon assessment and quantification of the loss alone...

Before Mr Parkin can incur repair costs, he is required to obtain Vero's consent to the method of repair and its cost, which may not be reasonably withheld by the insurance company."

He went on to note that:

"While Mr Parkin must actually incur costs, that does not equate to a requirement that he expend his own money.  Rather, a legal obligation to pay on his part is required to have been created."

Justice Mander therefore decided that Mr Parkin has control over the reinstatement of the property, subject to the requirement to obtain prior consent from Vero for the works.  However, this does not entitle Mr Parkin to payment from Vero until he incurs the cost of reinstatement.

Good faith and the Fair Insurance Code

Mr Parkin claimed that Vero breached both the implied duty of good faith and the Fair Insurance Code by not ensuring that Mr Parkin was aware that he had the right to control the reinstatement of the property.

Justice Mander decided that the evidence showed that Mr Parkin was always aware that he could obtain his own reports, rather than relying on the Vero claims management process.  He said that:

"I am not satisfied that Vero breached any contractual terms of the insurance policy, implied or otherwise.  While Mr Parkin's claim was managed within the purpose designed framework of the centralised process put in place by Vero to administer the large number of claims generated by the Canterbury earthquakes, it did not alter the terms and conditions of the policy which governed the contractual relationship between Mr Parkin and Vero.  I am not satisfied that Mr Parkin did not understand his contractual rights under the insurance policy.  He did not give evidence to that effect.  Nor am I satisfied that any actions on the part of Vero, in particular Mr Youl, led Mr Parkin to misapprehend the rights and obligations of the parties under the policy.

Mr Parkin was represented by an insurance broker who was actively involved in the claim process.  In my view, it is apparent that both parties saw advantages in having Vero directly involved in the management of the claim by utilising resources provided by MWHM to assess, scope, and cost the remedial work.  I do not find there was any breach of the obligation of good faith on the part of Vero in the way it sought to manage Mr Parkin's claim.  Similarly, I am not satisfied there has been any breach of the Fair Insurance Code".

In addition, Mr Parkin claimed that Vero's obligation to settle the claim, and the duty of good faith in relation to that obligation, carried on despite litigation having been commenced.  Justice Mander said that:

"Mr Webb's submission, in my view, is unrealistic.  Once a party has commenced proceedings against the other, that party has agreed to submit resolution of the dispute to the formal judicial process, which will be binding upon both parties.  It is unrealistic to suggest the parties are mandated to nonetheless resolve their differences.  While they are able to do this by way of settlement, there is no obligation to do so."

He therefore found that Vero did not breach the implied terms of the policy, or the Fair Insurance Code.

Standard of repair

Under the Vero policy, the standard of reinstatement is to repair or rebuild a house "to a standard or specification no more extensive, nor better than its condition when new".  Mr Parkin argued that this meant that repairs of the damaged portions of the house should be to a standard where it would be considered to be new, and not patched or second-hand. 

The main issue in this case was in respect of the remediation strategy for the foundations.  Mr Parkin said that he should not have to tolerate a building which had been "jacked and packed", or was in any way outside of new-build tolerances.  Vero's position was that if Mr Parkin's view was correct, "it would be impossible to ever discharge the obligation by repair, because a repaired element will never be identical to the item which was new."

Justice Mander decided that:

"It is unlikely that it was the parties' intention that every single item of damage would have to result in the damaged element being replaced, rather than repaired, which logically follows from Mr Parkin's construction of the standard of repair provided for by the policy."

He went on to say that:

"In my view, the purpose or utility to be achieved by the reinstatement of the individual item which has suffered damage cannot be divorced from the standard of remediation required to be achieved under the policy.  Broadly, the purpose of any particular part of the house can be divided into structural or functional components and those which have an aesthetic purpose; each, of course, is not mutually exclusive.  Where an item has only a functional purpose, so long as the repair or replacement restores that functional purpose to a "when new" condition, the obligations under the policy will be met.
Where there is also an aesthetic purpose there will be a need to ensure the remedial strategy also restores the former aesthetic to a "when new" quality.  That will not necessarily mean there will be an obligation to replace like for like, or to replace in every instance, but that may be the only realistic option in order to meet the standard of the policy."

As the foundations of the house are purely functional and have no aesthetic value, they could be repaired by "jacking and packing", rather than a complete replacement.

General damages

Mr Parkin had claimed $25,000 for general damages.  This claim was based on Vero's alleged failure to adhere to the terms of the policy.

Justice Mander declined to make an award for general damages, saying:

"I do not underestimate the personal stress and frustration Mr Parkin has experienced as a result of the earthquake damage to his house, however, in the circumstances of his case I have not found Vero to be in contractual breach of its obligations, or to have acted unreasonably in the circumstances.  There is therefore no foundation upon which an award of general damages could be made."

A copy of the decision is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions