New Zealand: Employment Court Confirms ‘Statutory Curb’ On Ability To Justify Dismissals

Last Updated: 5 July 2006
Article by John Hannan

In late 2004 a new definition of what counts as ‘justifiable’ dismissal or other employer action was inserted into the Employment Relations Act (the ERA). The Employment Court has just issued a definitive judgment confirming that the new test, in section 103A of the ERA, makes it substantially more difficult for an employer to justify dismissal or other disciplinary actions. This is a significant decision.

The case is noteworthy for Judge Shaw’s dissection of Air New Zealand’s investigative procedures - it is clear the Court is now taking the view that employers must get every jot and tittle of the investigation process right - otherwise they face a significant risk of being found to have acted in an unjustified way.

Air New Zealand Limited v Hudson – the facts

Andrea Hudson had been a customer service agent with Air New Zealand since 1995. Air New Zealand dismissed her in December 2004, relying on three incidents:

  • A claim that she had pushed another Air New Zealand boarding agent at the gate of an Air Tahiti Nui flight.
  • Complaints from LAN Chile about the way that Ms Hudson had treated a business class passenger at check-in. LAN Chile asked that Ms Hudson no longer perform any work for it.
  • A passenger complaint that Ms Hudson had required them to pay departure tax when this was not necessary.

There was a history of discontent with Ms Hudson’s services - some airlines going back over a period of time had asked that she not be assigned to work for them but Air New Zealand did not take this up in any formal way. Air New Zealand had issued her with a written warning about three customer complaints sometime previously, relating to ‘poor attitude’ and ‘lack of appropriate and professional customer service’. But by the time of the incidents involved in this case this warning had expired. Air New Zealand had arranged training and mentoring for Ms Hudson about these issues.

Ms Hudson had also received a final written warning in October 2003. This was about a significant breach of regulations. The incident had occurred at a time of considerable personal stress for her.

Despite this history, Judge Shaw found Air New Zealand’s decision to dismiss was unjustified.

How did Air New Zealand go wrong?

First, Judge Shaw found the dismissal was unjustified because Air New Zealand’s investigation was not carried out in a fair and reasonable way.


  • Air New Zealand did not give Ms Hudson any date or details about the LAN Chile complaint. The complaint was made in November 2004. Air New Zealand did not bring it up until December 2004. This was too long. Ms Hudson had little recall of the incident by then and so could not explain her version of what had happened.
  • The customer service complaint from Air Tahiti Nui was dated 9 October 2004. It was not specific. Two months on, Ms Hudson had no memory of the event so could not answer the complaint.
  • Air New Zealand should have given Ms Hudson prompt notice of the complaints and a full opportunity to comment on them when they were made. So the way it had raised these two matters was unfair. Ms Hudson did not have a proper opportunity to answer the complaints. Judge Shaw found that Air New Zealand's findings of serious breaches by Ms Hudson were not sustainable.

There were also serious flaws in the investigation of the ‘pushing’ complaint. First, Air New Zealand failed to interview a Ms Rorke, Ms Hudson’s team leader. Ms Hudson and the other person involved in the pushing incident had been to see Ms Rorke the day after the incident. Ms Hudson had apologised. The other staff member accepted the apology. Ms Hudson thought the matter was at an end.

Judge Shaw said that had Air New Zealand had this information from Ms Rorke there was a strong possibility its perceptions of the incident might have been altered.

Second, the Air New Zealand manager conducting the initial disciplinary meeting had directed that Ms Hudson’s representative (who was in fact Ms Rorke) was an observer only and could not speak on her behalf or intervene or give explanations. Judge Shaw found this was a serious error. Ms Rorke had remained silent throughout these two meetings. So Ms Hudson had not had proper representation. This was unfair.

Also, Judge Shaw found Air New Zealand unfairly deprived Ms Hudson of Ms Rorke’s input by directing that Ms Rorke could not speak or intervene. Air New Zealand should have told Ms Hudson that Ms Rorke was not an appropriate representative as she was a potential witness. Judge Shaw found that the investigation was not what a fair and reasonable employer would have done.

Air New Zealand decision to dismiss held to be wrong

Because the investigation was unfair, Judge Shaw concluded that Air New Zealand could not have properly reached the conclusion that dismissal was justified. Air New Zealand had not reached this decision properly. The investigation was not one that a fair and reasonable employer would have carried out. So the decision to dismiss could not be justified.

Observations by Judge Shaw on the adjusted test

Section 103A provides:

For the purposes of section 103(1)(a) and (b), the question of whether a dismissal or an action was justifiable must be determined, on an objective basis, by considering whether the employer’s actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer would have done in all the circumstances at the time of dismissal or action occurred.

Judge Shaw noted that this means that the justification for a dismissal must be determined objectively. That is, the matter must be viewed from the point of view of a neutral observer. This made no real change in the law as it had previously existed.

However Judge Shaw found section 103A did make a change by requiring that the decision must be one which a reasonable and fair employer would have taken, not what a reasonable and fair employer could have done.

So there was no room for a ‘range of reasonable responses’ approach. Previous cases on unjustified dismissal had said that all that an employer had to establish was that the decision was one which a fair and reasonable employer could have made. This meant that there could be a ‘range of possible responses’. Some reasonable and fair employers would dismiss if certain facts were established. Others would not. But now, that ‘band of tolerance’ has been much narrowed. Judge Shaw was explicit. She said that section 103A:

Represents a statutory curb on the range of responses an employer may justifiably take.

Judge Shaw was clear that the changes to the personal grievance provisions of the Act had the objective of redressing what she called the ‘inherent inequality of power in employment relationships’.

She pointed out that the changes made in section 103A require decisions about whether a dismissal is justified or not to be made by reference to the standards which a ‘hypothetical fair and reasonable employer’ would apply.

She also noted that there is an emphasis in the ERA on ‘early and informal intervention to resolve employment relationship problems’.

Implications for dismissal decisions

Inevitably employers will now need to act more cautiously and conservatively in relation to dismissals or other disciplinary action. It will be much more difficult to justify dismissal in marginal cases.

It is also apparent from this decision that the Employment Court is going to undertake minute scrutiny of an employer’s investigation procedures. It will readily find the decision to dismiss or impose other disciplinary action unjustified if these procedures have not protected the rights of the employee.

Finally, the Employment Court seems to think that employers who fail to make adequate attempts to resolve difficulties informally, and are over-ready to use formal disciplinary processes, will have difficulty justifying dismissal decisions. In summary, employers need to dust off their processes and check that they are rigorous and robust. A high standard of evidence-gathering will be required. And caution, and thinking twice and three times, will be needed before making a decision to dismiss, or impose other disciplinary action.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions