New Zealand: Court Of Appeal Of New Zealand Overturns Bridgecorp Decision

Last Updated: 2 January 2013
Article by John Edmond and Simon Black

Yesterday the Court of Appeal of New Zealand delivered its judgment in the much anticipated appeal of the Auckland High Court decision of Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Limited (Bridgecorp). The appeal was heard in conjunction with Chartis NZ v Houghton, dealing with similar subject matter. While not binding on Australian courts, the Bridgecorp decision, handed down on 15 September 2011, caused shockwaves throughout the Australian and New Zealand D&O market, leading insurers to restructure their D&O policies (to ensure directors have access to funds for defence costs) and the creation of entirely new insurance products such as D&O 'companion policies'. John Edmond, Partner, and Simon Black, Senior Associate, of Clyde & Co Australia report.

The Bridgecorp decision

By way of brief summary of the original Bridgecorp decision, the Bridgecorp Group collapsed and was placed into receivership owing investors some NZD 500 million.

The receivers asserted claims against various Bridgecorp directors for alleged breaches of their duties as directors. The receivers estimated the quantum of that claim at more than NZD 450 million.

At the same time, the directors were the subject of a criminal prosecution by the New Zealand equivalent of ASIC. That prosecution was on the cusp of trial. In order to defend themselves in the trial, the directors wanted to access the NZD 20 million cover provided under their D&O policy.

To preserve the funds available under the policy, the receivers asserted a charge over any insurance proceeds that may be payable in relation to the receiver's claim, citing section 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ).

Lang J of the Auckland High Court was asked to determine whether the receivers' section 9 charge prevented the directors from obtaining reimbursement under the policy for their defence costs incurred in relation to the trial.

His Honour held that, in circumstances where the insurer was aware of a claim for an amount greater than the limit of indemnity under the policy, any payments by the insurer towards the directors' defence costs under the policy would not reduce the sum subject to any charge pursuant to section 9 of the act. The court held that, to allow this would render the charge created by section 9 ineffective, resulting in either a reduction in the funds available for the civil claimants, or requiring the insurer to pay defence costs in addition to the overall policy limit.

In effect, the Court's finding in Bridgecorp meant that any payment by an insurer would be made as a volunteer and it would still remain liable to pay the full indemnity sum to the third party claimants. This had the practical effect of freezing the payment of defence costs under liability policies that did not expressly separate defence costs from coverage for liability for compensation.

While obviously a concerning decision for D&O insurers in New Zealand, the similarities between the New Zealand Law Reform Act and legislation in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory1, meant that uncertainty was also created in the Australian D&O market and other liability markets beyond that.

Bridgecorp Appeal

The hearing of the Bridgecorp Appeal was held on 5 September 2012, before O'Regan, Arnold and Harrison JJ. The Court's decision, handed down yesterday, can be summarised in four short points which will have implications for insurers on both sides of the Tasman:

  • the appeal is allowed;
  • the declaration by the High Court is quashed;
  • Bridgecorp's application for leave to adduce further evidence is dismissed; and
  • Bridgecorp must pay costs to Mr Steigrad2.

In allowing the appeal, the Court has overturned the finding of the High Court in Bridgecorp on two grounds:

  • firstly, on the grounds that section 9 of the act does not apply to insurance monies payable in respect of defence costs, even where such cover is combined with third party liability cover and made subject to a single limit of liability; and
  • secondly, that section 9 of the act is limited in scope and is not intended to rewrite or interfere with contractual rights as to cover and reimbursement. Although not determinative in this case, the Court concluded that "the purpose of s 9 is not to rewrite the bargain struck between the parties."

Importantly, the Court held that the appeal would have succeeded on the first of these grounds alone.

In concluding that section 9 could not be used by the receiver to apply a charge over the directors' entitlement to defence costs, the Court stated unequivocally that:

"...Bridgecorp is not entitled to a statutory charge over insurance money lawfully payable by QBE to Mr Steigrad to reimburse his existing liability to pay defence costs incurred with the insurer's consent or otherwise as opposed to a contingent liability for damages or compensation payable to Bridgecorp."

Taking this one step further (in a comment which will be of interest both to insurers who have developed companion D&O policy coverage, or re-worded their existing D&O policies, and entities taking out such cover) the Court goes on to state:

"...there was no suggestion that, if there had been separate defence costs and third party liability policies, section 9 would have applied to the defence costs policy. Combining the two forms of cover – defence costs and third party liability – in a single policy with separate sums insured would not affect this outcome. In our view, combining the two forms of cover in a single policy subject to a single sum insured does not change the analysis either. There is a single, aggregated fund from which the two distinct liabilities can be met. The charge attaches to the balance that is available to meet third party claims after any defence costs liability has been met."

And again the Court drew the sensible conclusion that:

"The existence of a single, aggregated limit – cannot operate to deprive Mr Steigrad of the right to obtain reimbursement for his defence costs as that would render his defence costs cover, in practical terms, useless."

The Bridgecorp Appeal, therefore, confirms that (in New Zealand at least) a section 9 charge cannot be used to deprive a director from seeking reimbursement for his defence costs under a D&O policy for amounts which are distinct from a third party liability owed (or potentially owed). In short, the decision places insureds and insurers back in the position they probably thought they were in prior to Bridgecorp.

Implications

We expect that the decision will be welcomed by insureds, brokers and insurers to the extent that it provides some certainty as to how the law in this area operates and how D&O protection should be structured.

We also anticipate renewed discussion in the industry about the language to be used in D&O products going forward and whether it is still necessary for directors and officers to take out separate defence costs cover to ensure that protection is in place when they need it.

Footnotes

1 For example section 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW).

2 In relation to the concurrently heard matter of Chartis v Houghton, the court concluded that Mr Houghton not presently entitled pursuant to section 9 of the Law Reform Act to charge money payable by Chartis to Mr Saunders and his co-insured pursuant to a prospectus liability insurance policy in reimbursement of their defence costs incurred in defending a claim or claims brought against them by Mr Houghton and others.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions