New Zealand: Insolvent transactions – prior consideration is enough for the good faith defence

Brief Counsel

Download: Insolvent transactions - prior consideration is enough for the good faith defence - 11 December.pdf

The High Court has clarified the extended good faith defence, introduced into the Companies Act in 2007, for creditors facing 'claw back' of a payment by liquidators.1

The Court's interpretation, while good news for creditors, may make it more difficult for liquidators to recover insolvent transactions.

The 2007 amendment to section 296(3)

Before the 2007 amendment, a creditor could use the good faith defence only if it had acted in good faith and relied to its detriment on the validity of the payment. In 2007, the defence was expanded also to protect a creditor who had acted in good faith, and who "gave value".

The question arises, when must that value be provided? Before or after the allegedly voidable payment?

In Meltzer v Hiway Stabilizers New Zealand Ltd, the High Court has said that either value prior to payment by the debtor, or fresh value given by the creditor after payment by the debtor, is enough. In doing so, the Court has followed Australian authority, and has agreed with the recent decision of Associate Judge Christiansen in Farrell v Fences & Kerbs Ltd.2

For a copy of Meltzer v Hiway Stabilizers New Zealand Ltd, click here.

For a copy of Farrell v Fences & Kerbs Ltd, click here.


The liquidators of Window Holdings Limited sought to set aside payments the company had made to Hiway Stabilizers NZ Limited. It was accepted that, at the time of the payments, the company was unable to pay its debts, and that Hiway had received more towards the satisfaction of its debts than it would have received in the company's liquidation if still a creditor. As such, the payments were insolvent transactions under the Companies Act.

Hiway relied on the section 296(3) defence to oppose the liquidators' application. The section prevents the recovery of payments if the party from whom recovery is sought proves that, when it received the payments:

  • it acted in good faith
  • a reasonable person in its position would not have suspected, and it did not have reasonable grounds for suspecting, that the company was, or would become, insolvent, and
  • it gave value for the property or altered its position in the reasonably held belief that the transfer was valid and would not be set aside.

The liquidators accepted that Hiway satisfied the first two limbs of the defence. It had acted in good faith and did not suspect insolvency. The case therefore hinged on whether Hiway could prove, in the words of the section, that:

"when [Hiway] received the property ... [Hiway] gave value for the property".

The liquidators' unsuccessful argument

The liquidators relied on a plain meaning of the words in section 296(3) to argue that Hiway had to provide fresh or new value after the payments were made. The section itself requires value to be given "when [the creditor] received the property". In this case the property was the payments in question.

The liquidators also said that, if "gave value for the property" included value given before payment, the third limb of the section 296(3) defence would be redundant, because a creditor will always have provided some prior value, otherwise it would not be a creditor.

The liquidators went on to argue that that Parliament did not intend to override the pari passu rule and that creditors should not be able to claim the benefit of the running account defence as well as the section 296(3) defence.

"Gave value" includes value given prior to payment

The Court preferred Hiway's argument that the primary concern is whether there was a direct relationship between the payment received and the value given. That included the value given in the original transaction.

The basis for the decision was the policy behind the defence, and Parliament's desire to adopt the Australian position.

On the policy, Justice Toogood agreed with the approach taken recently by Associate Judge Christiansen in Farrell v Fences & Kerbs Ltd. It would be "inequitable" to allow the company in liquidation to:

"keep what it has received and to recover what it paid for it, in order to increase the distribution to creditors who have provided value but received no payment".

Avoiding the payment would, it seems, let the general body of creditors have their cake and eat it too.

The Court agreed that the 2007 amendment to the New Zealand statute was intended to align our law with the Australian position. The Judge reviewed legislative material, Australian legislation and some Australian case law. His conclusion was that Parliament had intended to adopt the Australian defence, even though the words of the New Zealand provision are not identical.

Important development for liquidators

The recent decisions in both this case and in Farrell v Fences & Kerbs Ltd, make recovery of insolvent transactions more difficult for liquidators.

The defence has been widened considerably from the pre-2007 requirement that the creditor must act in reliance on the validity of the payment. That requirement has effectively gone in relation to voidable payments to creditors. Every creditor will have provided value – by advancing the credit in the first place.

A payment to a creditor will therefore never be voidable where the creditor acted in good faith and had no reason to suspect insolvency. However it is worth noting that the section 296 defence applies to a wide range of cases, and is not limited to claims against creditors, so the third element will not always be redundant as suggested by the liquidators in the Meltzer case.

But the arguments are very finely balanced. There are other policy considerations, including the fundamental concept of pari passu sharing that underlies the law of insolvency. We expect that the Court of Appeal will be called on to rule on the issue. In doing so we would expect it to consider those policy issues, and review, in greater detail than the High Court, the history of the Australian provision and case law. We will follow developments with interest.


1Meltzer v Hiway Stabilizers New Zealand Ltd [2012] NZHC 3281

2Farrell v Fences & Kerbs Ltd [2012] NZHC 2865

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cavell Leitch
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cavell Leitch
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions