New Zealand: The Lombard case – more lessons for directors

Last Updated: 21 July 2012

By Sarah Kerr

What was the case about?

The case related to alleged breaches of the Securities Act 1978 (the "Securities Act") by the directors of Lombard Finance & Investments Limited ("LFIL"). LFIL was a finance company which periodically raised money from the public to on-lend to borrowers who were predominantly property developers. As part of its periodic fundraising, and to comply with the requirements of the Securities Act, LFIL issued prospectuses and distributed investment statements. These offer documents contained information for investors who were encouraged to invest in debenture stock and unsecured notes of LFIL.

In April 2008, receivers were appointed to LFIL by Perpetual Trust, the trustee for the debenture stockholders of LFIL. According to the High Court judgment, the likely projected return for secured investors is less than 24 cents in the dollar whilst unsecured investors in LFIL may lose the entirety of their investments.

The Lombard case has garnered significant media attention, not only because of the imposition of criminal liability on directors but also because of the high profile directors involved. The directors found guilty of criminal charges under the Securities Act included the Right Honourable Sir Doug Graham (a former Minister of Justice, Attorney General and Minister in charge of the Serious Fraud Office) and the Honourable Bill Jeffries (a former Cabinet Minister whose portfolios included Justice and Transport). The two other directors involved were Michael Reeves (also CEO of LFIL) and Lawrence Bryant.

What were the charges against the directors?

The charges against the directors were brought under section 58 of the Securities Act (criminal liability for mis-statement in advertisement or registered prospectus). The five charges under that section related to allegedly untrue statements in an amended prospectus issued by LFIL in December 2007, allegedly untrue statements in three investment statements issued in December 2007 and an allegedly untrue statement in a DVD that was apparently distributed between March and April 2008. (The DVD constituted an "advertisement" for the purposes of the Securities Act).

The Crown's arguments that untrue statements were made in the prospectus were centred around five key matters, as follows:

  • LFIL's liquidity;
  • The impairment of major loans made by LFIL to borrowers;
  • The existence of, and adherence to, lending and credit policies as a means of limiting risks;
  • The absence of adverse change in LFIL's financial position since 31 March 2007; and
  • An assurance that there were no other matters material to the offer of securities, beyond those referred to in the amended prospectus.

What did the Crown have to prove?

Because the offences under section 58 of the Securities Act are strict liability offences, the issue of whether or not the directors intended to distribute offer documents that were false or misleading is irrelevant. The Crown merely had to prove that:

  1. the offer documents contained untrue statements (which could either be an affirmative statement or a material omission of information);
  2. the offer documents were distributed (as regards the prospectus); and
  3. the accused directors signed the prospectus, or it was signed on their behalf.

In relation to the DVD, the Crown needed to show that the directors were directors at the time of its distribution.

What defences were available to the directors?

The directors could escape liability under section 58 by arguing that, on the balance of probabilities, the untrue statements were immaterial, or that they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did, up to the time of distribution of the prospectus/investment statements/DVD, believe that the statements were true.

An additional defence available in relation to the distribution of the DVD was the defence of total absence of fault, which, as a settled legal principle, is open as a defence to parties accused of certain strict liability offences.

What did the Court find?

The Court found that the directors made untrue statements in the prospectus and investment statements in relation to two out of five matters alleged by the Crown to have been untrue.

The key respect in which the Court found untrue statements had been made was as regards the liquidity of LFIL (i.e. the ability of LFIL to meet its payment obligations). Specifically, the court found that "... there was a material discrepancy between the liquidity squeeze confronting LFIL in December 2007, and the more confident comments on liquidity conveyed in the offer documents."

The court noted that on 15 November 2007, Sir Doug Graham had commented in an email to Mr Reeves (the CEO) that LFIL was "sailing very close to the wind now and the next two or three months will be critical". The court also placed emphasis on the fact that predictions given to the Board by management since September 2007 in relation to projected repayment of loans had been consistently out by more or less than half the predicted repayments in each month and that this had not been accurately reflected in the prospectus and investment statements.

Although the judge was satisfied that the directors "genuinely believed in the accuracy and adequacy of the content of the offer documents when they were issued" he held that they could not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that it was reasonable for them to omit further details in relation to liquidity issues facing LFIL that were known to them but not acknowledged in the prospectus and investment statements.

The second key matter in which the court found (by extension) that the directors were guilty of making an untrue statement was in connection with the statement in the prospectus that "There are no other material matters relating to the offer of securities offered under this Prospectus other than those set out in this Prospectus".

For various reasons, the court found that all directors could invoke the defence of total absence of fault in relation to the distribution of the DVD.

Important "lessons" for directors arising from the Lombard decision

  1. The buck stops with you, as director: Directors cannot delegate their directors' duties. Even where advisers such as lawyers and auditors sign off on offer documents or where offer documents appear to be "market standard" this does not instantly absolve you from liability as a director of a public issuer in relation to the content of those offer documents. You need to closely review and consider the content of offer documents yourself and ensure those offer documents do not contain any untrue statements. As the Court said: "The directors' obligations in relation to the accuracy of content of offer documents are non-delegable".
  2. Beware of over-reliance on management: You can rely on the advice of management but only up to a point. If you have any concerns about the information provided by management or, more generally, about the ability of management to perform their duties, you must enquire further and resolve these concerns. In particular, if you are relying on management projections or reports which have ultimately turned out to be materially inaccurate more than once, serious questions need to be asked before continuing to rely on such information. As the Court said: "Neither sections [2B (Meaning of "due enquiry") of the Securities Act or 138 (Use of information and advice) of the Companies Act] can be read in a way that would relieve a director of the obligation to check on the competence of a delegate, in any circumstances where a signal occurs that would put a reasonable director on notice of the need to do so... By the time of the February 2008 Board meeting, the pattern of errors in the projections of performance by borrowers over the preceding six months should have caused the Board to question the adequacy of management of the major loans."
  3. Err on the side of disclosure: If, as a director, you are making an important judgement call which may be crucial to the ongoing financial health of the company of which you are a director (e.g. where management forecasts are being relied upon and such forecasts have previously been proven unreliable) disclose that judgement call in the offer documents.
  4. Don't let a fear of being unduly pessimistic hinder disclosure: The law requires directors to disclose in offer documents all material matters, including those which might adversely affect the value of securities previously issued by the company. A fear of "upsetting" the market or negatively impacting the value of existing securities is no excuse for holding back on disclosure of material information in offer documents.

What is the relevance of the Financial Markets Conduct Bill ("FMC Bill") to charges of a similar nature?

The FMC Bill is currently before Parliament. It was introduced to Parliament on 12 October 2011 and had its first reading on 7 March 2012. It has been referred to the Commerce Select Committee who are due to report back on 7 September 2012.

The broad purpose of the FMC Bill is "to provide an enduring financial market conduct regulatory regime that promotes confident and informed participation in New Zealand's financial markets". Amongst other things, the FMC Bill repeals in its entirety the Securities Act. The equivalent of section 58 of the Securities Act (which is the relevant section in the Lombard case) in the FMC Bill is clause 259 (criminal liability for false or misleading statement or information). The maximum penalty for an offence under that section is, for an individual, imprisonment for a term of not exceeding five years and a fine not exceeding $500,000 or both and, in any other case, a fine not exceeding $2.5 million.

The explanatory note to the FMC Bill explains that serious criminal offences which provide for the possibility of imprisonment are targeted at "egregious violations of the law, such as where the conduct in question involved knowledge or recklessness".

Under the new regime, it is unlikely that the Lombard directors would have been the subject of criminal charges or at risk of being subject to criminal penalties. They would, however, likely still have been the subject of civil charges. In a similar vein, the proposed criminalisation of certain directors' duties in the Companies Act (the duty to act in good faith and the best interests of the company and the duty to avoid carrying on the business of the company in a manner likely to create a substantial risk of serious loss to the company's creditors) will require knowledge on the part of the accused. The Companies and Limited Partnerships Amendment Bill which is the vehicle for these changes prescribes a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or a fine of $200,000 for breach of these directors' duties.

Sentencing of the Lombard directors

Sentencing of the Lombard four is set down for 29 March and, although the charges are criminal and criminal penalties apply, it is likely that the sentences imposed on the directors will take the form of fines and community-based sentencing because the Court did not find the directors were dishonest or negligent (and acknowledged that it was not part of the Crown's case that the directors' conduct was anything but honest). This may well cause a media uproar, with those who do not have a full understanding of the case perhaps taking the view that the directors have been let off lightly and inadequately punished. The long term consequences of the decision could mean that it is much harder for companies (particularly those who are issuing prospectuses and investment statements) to attract good quality directors onto boards. Directors' fees will likely also increase to reflect the heightened risks associated with assuming a directorship.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.