New Zealand: Software patents in New Zealand: Still no clarity

Last Updated: 7 August 2011
Article by Jonathan Lucas

An updated set of guidelines on how patent applications involving software will be examined under the new Patents Act has been published. The much-needed clarity is still lacking.

In June of this year, we reported the unanimous rejection of the draft guidelines issued by the Ministry of Economic Development (MED) for examining patent applications for computer-related inventions in New Zealand under the new Patents Bill.

The MED has now released an Explanatory Note which seeks to clarify the examination approach previously outlined in the draft guidelines.  It improves marginally on the draft guidelines in providing a small amount of clarity but there seems to have been little consideration of the vast majority of the feedback provided on the draft guidelines.  As a result, much of what was criticised in the draft guidelines is still present in the Explanatory Note.  The result is a continued lack of clarity for New Zealand innovators and businesses.

Focus on clause 15(3A)

The Explanatory Note improves on the draft guidelines in that it is solely focused on explaining the extent of exclusion to patentability under clause 15(3A), which says that "a computer program is not a patentable invention".  This is what the MED was tasked to do.  The draft guidelines tried to go further and lay out what will fulfil the "manner of manufacture" requirement as well, but feedback was received to the effect that this was not appropriate given the wealth of established case law in this field.

No solution to fundamental problems

In the Explanatory Note, the MED has failed to address the key issues identified by most of the parties who filed submissions to the draft guidelines.  Firstly, most of the submissions wanted clause 15(3A) to be removed because of the adverse effect it will have on New Zealand's innovators and economy.  Secondly, there was much concern that any guidelines would be disregarded by a court in the face of an exclusion in the form of clause 15(3A).

But those issues stem from the proposed wording of the legislation and only the lawmakers can alter this.  The MED has tackled the task it was set, which is to come up with examination guidelines within the context of clause 15(3A).  Unfortunately, the draft guidelines and Explanatory Note have led to even less clarity.

No adoption of European approach to examination

Most of the submissions on the draft guidelines argued that the approach of the European Patent Office (EPO) to examining patent applications would provide the clearest position in the event that an exclusion to patentability for software inventions remains in the legislation.  Some submissions pointed out that the law in the UK has developed since Aerotel and therefore New Zealand courts are likely to look to the most recent UK decisions when issuing rulings.

The MED has chosen to overlook this feedback and the Explanatory Note maintains the use of the Aerotel test for examination.  MED's justification for this is that the UK developments since Aerotel move its law closer to that of the EPO but European law is fundamentally different to New Zealand law in that it requires a "technical contribution" for patentability; a concept not present in the Patents Bill.  This distinction seems somewhat flawed and results from the decision to maintain the "manner of manufacture" requirement in the New Zealand Patents Bill.  Such wording aligns New Zealand's legislation with that of Australia, but causes problems when New Zealand attempts to impose an exclusion not present in Australia.

Unclear example

In an attempt to clarify the position proposed in New Zealand, the Explanatory Note provides examples of inventions that would and would not be patentable under clause 15(3A) of the Patents Bill.  Regrettably, one of the examples seems only to muddy the waters further.

The example in question is an invention which improves the operation of a computer by providing a way of indexing library functions to ensure the computer operates reliably following changes to the library.  According to the Explanatory Note, such an invention would not be patentable in New Zealand because the contribution to human knowledge is no more than a computer program, so is excluded under clause 15(3A).  There seem to be two problems with this conclusion.

Firstly, paragraph 38 of the Explanatory Note sets out a number of questions which can be used to help determine whether the actual contribution to human knowledge made by the invention is just a computer program (in which case it would fail step three of the Aerotel test).  One of these questions is: "is the computer program merely a tool adapted to achieve efficiency or something similar?"  If the answer is yes, the invention is unlikely to be excluded from patentability.  In the example in question, the invention has the effect of ensuring a computer continues to operate reliably.  Surely this constitutes a tool to achieve efficiency or something similar, so how can it not be patentable according to the questions in paragraph 38?

Secondly, the Explanatory Note does not seem to apply the modified Aerotel test to the example.  If it did, the conclusion would be that the invention was patentable.  This example is essentially the invention that was the subject of a UK patent application by Symbian Ltd.  The UK Court of Appeal applied the Aerotel test and held the invention to be patentable.

The Explanatory Note recognises that the conclusion differs from UK (and European) practice, explaining that this is because the UK requires a "technical contribution" for patentability.  However, the requirement that an invention is technical is tested by the fourth step of the Aerotel test, which has been dropped in the revised version of the test in the Explanatory Note.  Applying the first three steps of Aerotel to the example should result in the conclusion that the invention is patentable, just as was the case in the Symbian decision of the UK Court of Appeal.

The crucial point made by the judge in Symbian is that a computer operating by way of the claimed method is a better computer because it is faster and more reliable than it would be without the method.  Saying that the invention is simply a better computer program gives no credit to the practical reality of the effect produced on the computer itself.  As such, the contribution to human knowledge is more than simply a program for a computer.  There seems to be no reason why the same consideration would not make such an invention patentable in New Zealand in view of clause 15(3A).

Over to the lawmakers

The MED was faced with a very difficult task of coming up with guidelines for examining patent applications involving computer-related inventions in the face of clause 15(3A).  Unfortunately, the draft guidelines and Explanatory Note have not resulted in a position that leaves New Zealand innovators clear as to what is patentable and what is not.

There is no formal procedure for providing feedback on the Explanatory Note but, even if there was, the feedback would be more of the same.  It seems that it is now back to the lawmakers to try to resolve the problems identified in the submissions.  Hopefully a solution will involve re-examining the basis for introducing clause 15(3A) in the first place, but otherwise by looking to align the wording of New Zealand's legislation more closely with that of the UK and Europe so that the wealth of case law in those jurisdictions can give New Zealand innovators and the software industry some confidence as to what a New Zealand court is likely to consider patentable.  Clarity is key.

This article was written by Jonathan Lucas, an Associate in our Auckland office.  To contact Jonathan, please email him on or phone 09 914 6740.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

James and Wells is the 2010 New Zealand Law Awards winner of the Intellectual Property Law Award for excellence in client service.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
James & Wells Intellectual Property
James & Wells Intellectual Property
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
James & Wells Intellectual Property
James & Wells Intellectual Property
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions