New Zealand: ENVIROLINK: Environmental Law Newsletter October 2001

Last Updated: 24 October 2001
Article by Karen Price


Biosecurity Strategy

Biosecurity Minister, Hon. Jim Sutton, recently launched a national programme designed to raise public awareness of the importance of protecting New Zealand against the economic and social consequences arising from biosecurity threats.

Entitled "Protect New Zealand", the programme is primarily focused at raising awareness across all sectors of the risks introduced pests and diseases pose for New Zealand. The Protect New Zealand campaign covers biosecurity awareness in the marine/aquaculture, horticulture, agriculture, forestry, conservation, environmental and health sectors. It targets awareness of pre-border, border and post-border biosecurity measures and responsibilities.

Further information on the Protect New Zealand campaign is available on the website

The launch of the campaign coincides with the release of a national issues paper entitled "Developing a Biosecurity Strategy for New Zealand". Produced by the Biosecurity Strategy Development Team, the paper provides an outline of issues related to biosecurity risks that threaten our economy, health and environment.

The issues paper will form the basis of nation-wide public consultation prior to the release of a final biosecurity strategy in December 2002. The consultation includes a "Protect New Zealand Week" and international conference planned for May 2002. A nation-wide series of workshops, public meetings and a national hui are also planned in October to November 2002.

The issues paper, and other information about the biosecurity strategy, is available on the website

Energy Conservation Strategy

The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) has released its National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. The two main targets are:

  1. a 20 percent improvement in New Zealand’s energy efficiency by 2012; and
  2. a further increase of between 19 percent and 42 percent in energy production from renewable sources by 2012.

Five action programmes (for Government, energy supply, industry, buildings and appliances, and transport) are designed to help achieve the strategy targets.

Mechanisms being evaluated to achieve the increase in energy production from renewable sources include:

  • Tradable renewable energy requirements for all energy retailers;
  • Tradable renewable energy requirements specific to electricity retailers;
  • Tradable fossil fuel use restrictions for all electricity generators and other energy suppliers;
  • Support for sectors such as solar hot water and renewable industrial process heat; and
  • Voluntary measures such as negotiated industry agreements or green pricing of renewable energy.

The strategy also includes other measures such as minimum energy performance standards and labelling for generic industry equipment, sector energy efficiency studies, international benchmarking and research on woody biomass utilisation.

The action programmes are largely of a voluntary nature. However, previous initiatives, such as the Energy Wise Companies campaign, also run by EECA have proved successful, with 700 of New Zealand’s largest organisations already part of that campaign.

339 public submissions were received on the strategy, a copy of which can be viewed on line at




Submissions on the review co-ordinated by the Hon. Pete Hodgson (in culmination with the Ministry of Economic Development) on the way New Zealand’s electricity system functioned over the winter closed on 5 October 2001.

Submissions will be posted on a public website, and cross-submissions will be invited. Following the submission process, cabinet will be invited to make decisions on whether further changes are required to electricity arrangements.

The terms of reference of the review are:

  1. What factors contributed to wholesale electricity market developments in the 2001 winter?
  2. How effective were the existing market arrangements in responding to these developments?
  3. What changes should be made to market arrangements, why are these changes recommended and what are the costs and benefits?
  4. What changes to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Campaign should be considered in case the need arises in future for a similar campaign?

Submissions are posted on: There is opportunity for parties to comment on the submissions of others, and cross-submissions are due by 19 October 2001.




The Taonga Maori Protection Bill was presented to the House by the Minister of Maori Affairs, Hon. Parekura Horomia, on 6 September 2001. The Bill, currently at the Select Committee stage, was originally introduced by Tau Henare in 1996.

The Bill essentially provides for the preservation of Maori cultural heritage in New Zealand and related purposes. In particular, the Bill provides for:

  • The establishment of the Taonga Maori Trust. The Trust would assist the Ministry of Maori Development in the administration of the Taonga Maori Register, which would record the location of "taonga" (defined as physical treasures), held off-shore. The Trust would also work with the Ministry of Maori Development in arranging the return of taonga to iwi.

  • The prohibition of sale or alienation of physical Maori taonga without the prior consent of Maori through consultation.

  • The requirement for multi-national corporations and foreign companies to include in their annual reports mechanisms and initiatives pursued in the protection of taonga. In addition, prior to beginning operations in New Zealand, foreign companies would be required to illustrate their understanding of the need for the protection of taonga and a practical commitment to achieving that objective.

Before the Bill is passed, the Select Committee will need to address several important issues. For example, there is concern that the Bill limits taonga to physical cultural property, whereas Article II of the Treaty of Waitangi allows for a far wider interpretation of "taonga". In the 21 May 2001 edition of Envirolink we discussed the High Court’s consideration of the term "taonga", and whether it can include both tangible and intangible aspects, in the Blakeley v ERMA decision. Further, the Bill does not currently contain provision for Regulations to specify the detail of protection policies, or sanctions for breaching the Bill.





Arrigato Investments Limited v Auckland Regional Council (Court of Appeal, 11 September 2001)

The Court in Arrigato considered two questions of law arising from the High Court decision. One of those questions concerned the "permitted base line" test, and whether an unimplemented resource consent could be taken into account under that test.

In the July 2001 edition of Envirolink, we discussed the Court of Appeal’s decision regarding the permitted baseline test in Smith Chilcott Ltd v Martinez.

In Arrigato the Court of Appeal affirmed its earlier decision in Smith Chilcott, and stated that:

"…the permitted baseline in terms of Bayley, as supplemented by Smith Chilcott Ltd, is the existing environment overlaid with such relevant activity (not being a fanciful activity) as is permitted by the plan. Thus, if the activity permitted by the plan will create some adverse effect on the environment, that adverse effect does not count in the s104 and 105 assessments. It is part of the permitted baseline in the sense that it is deemed to be already affecting the environment or, if you like, it is not a relevant adverse effect".

The Court then turned its mind to whether the above test should be expanded so as to include unimplemented resource consent activities within the permitted baseline. There is an important difference between what is permitted under a plan and what is allowed under a resource consent, and the Court considered submissions which were made in respect of "environmental creep". That expression describes a process whereby having achieved a resource consent for a particular activity or building, a person may seek consent for something more, and try to use their existing unimplemented consent as the baseline from which the effects of the additional proposal are to be assessed.

Ultimately the Court decided that the competing contentions in this area require a flexible approach and that there could be no rigid rule either way. While what is permitted as of right by a plan is deemed to be part of the relevant environment, further assessment of the relevant environment and relevant effects are essentially questions of fact. On the facts in Arrigato, the Court held that the Environment Court did not err in taking into account Arrigato’s existing resource consent.

Dye v Auckland Regional Council (Court of Appeal, 11 September 2001)

In Dye v Auckland Regional Council, the Court of Appeal restored the Environment Court’s decision to grant a resource consent for the subdivision of land in the Rodney District. The appeal was heard immediately after Arrigato, and judgment was given contemporaneously, as essentially the same issue was in question.

As in Arrigato, the plaintiff intended to subdivide rural land.

The resource consent was granted by the Environment Court, and the case was appealed to the High Court. The High Court held that the Environment Court had misinterpreted or misunderstood the objectives and policies of the Rodney District Plan because, in its view, the Environment Court did not pay proper regard to the relevant planning documents in accordance with section 104 of the Act. To this end, it was held that the Environment Court had erred in law.

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court was not entitled to come to its decision because it was not open for the High Court to differ in its assessment of whether the subdivision was contrary to the relevant objectives and policies. The Court of Appeal stated:

"…the decision of the High Court represents more of an independent assessment by the Judge than a consideration by him of whether the conclusion to which the Environment Court came was open to it in law… The Environment Court may well have taken a different view from the Judge about whether the proposal was contrary to the objectives and policies. It was not for the Judge to differ on an appeal limited to questions of law".

After a detailed examination of the relevant policy documents the Court of Appeal held that the Environment Court was entitled in reach its conclusion and had not erred in its assessment of the subdivision under sections 104(1)(a) and 105(2A)(b).

The Court of Appeal also examined the issues of "precedent" and "cumulative" effects which were raised in the High Court. In relation to precedent effect, the High Court held that the Environment Court had erred in finding that its decision would produce no precedent effect. However, the Court of Appeal held that the Judge in the High Court had moved outside the scope of the law in considering the precedent effect of the Environment Court’s decision. It held that the granting of a resource consent had no precedent effect in the strict sense because a consent authority is not bound by a previous decision of the same or another authority. Furthermore, as no two applications are likely to ever be the same, the most that can be said is that the granting of one consent may have an influence on the other application.

On the issue of cumulative effects, the Court of Appeal found that it was not a mandatory requirement to make an area-wide assessment of all possible effects of granting of consent, as suggested by the High Court. The Court of Appeal held that the express definition of "effects" provided in section 3 was not relevant in interpreting s104(1)(a) since the purpose of that section was to address only adverse effects which were "actual" or "potential". As such, the Environment Court was not required to take into account "potential cumulative precedent effects" which would stretch the intention of Parliament beyond what was intended by the Act.




  • RMA’s 10th birthday

On 1 October 2001 it was 10 years since the Resource Management Act became law. The RMA replaced over 50 pieces of legislation, including in respect of water and soil conservation, town and country planning, coastal and geothermal management, air quality and noise control, with a single framework for environmental management and planning in New Zealand.

This overarching piece of legislation, founded on the principle of sustainable management, has drawn both criticism and support from an array of different sectors. Criticisms include a lack of central resourcing and guidance, the cost of consents, and delays at the local, and most particularly the Environment Court, levels. Improvement, in air and water quality and better effluent management, on the other hand, are considered by some to be RMA successes.

The National Party has coincided the launch of its policy on the legislation with the RMA’s 10th anniversary. Similarly, Environment Minister Hon. Marion Hobbs is expected to announce a package of amendments next month. 1 October was also to have been the date when the Resource Management Amendment Bill came into effect. The Bill however, is still sitting on Parliament’s order paper, due to significant changes being made to the Bill following the change in Government.

  • Submissions can currently be made to the Ministry for the Environment on:

  • the draft action plan for reducing dioxin discharges. Submissions close December 2001;

  • the establishment of controls for stationary tanks containing hazardous liquids. Submissions close November 2001; and

  • the draft guidelines for the management of hazardous waste. Submissions close January 2002.

  • Petrol and diesel quality standards

The Ministry of Economic Development has released a discussion paper concerning a review of petrol and diesel quality regulations. This is the first review of the Petroleum Products Specifications Regulations since they were first issued in 1998.

Submissions on the discussion paper closed on 15 October 2001.

  • Environmental standards in international trade agreements?

United States Senator Max Baucus, Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has recently proposed that countries entering trade agreements with the US must make assurances that they will not lower labour and environmental standards to distort trade.

His proposal will recommend that trade agreements should encourage US trading partners to adhere to International Labour Organisation core standards and allow restrictions on trade produced by forced labour. Senator Baucus also proposes that in the World Trade Organisation, the US should seek to negotiate rules that reflect deference to multilateral environmental agreements, and that the Bush administration demonstrate commitment to the ILO and UN environmental programs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions