New Zealand: ENVIROLINK: Environmental Law Newsletter October 2001

Last Updated: 24 October 2001
Article by Karen Price


Biosecurity Strategy

Biosecurity Minister, Hon. Jim Sutton, recently launched a national programme designed to raise public awareness of the importance of protecting New Zealand against the economic and social consequences arising from biosecurity threats.

Entitled "Protect New Zealand", the programme is primarily focused at raising awareness across all sectors of the risks introduced pests and diseases pose for New Zealand. The Protect New Zealand campaign covers biosecurity awareness in the marine/aquaculture, horticulture, agriculture, forestry, conservation, environmental and health sectors. It targets awareness of pre-border, border and post-border biosecurity measures and responsibilities.

Further information on the Protect New Zealand campaign is available on the website

The launch of the campaign coincides with the release of a national issues paper entitled "Developing a Biosecurity Strategy for New Zealand". Produced by the Biosecurity Strategy Development Team, the paper provides an outline of issues related to biosecurity risks that threaten our economy, health and environment.

The issues paper will form the basis of nation-wide public consultation prior to the release of a final biosecurity strategy in December 2002. The consultation includes a "Protect New Zealand Week" and international conference planned for May 2002. A nation-wide series of workshops, public meetings and a national hui are also planned in October to November 2002.

The issues paper, and other information about the biosecurity strategy, is available on the website

Energy Conservation Strategy

The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) has released its National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. The two main targets are:

  1. a 20 percent improvement in New Zealand’s energy efficiency by 2012; and
  2. a further increase of between 19 percent and 42 percent in energy production from renewable sources by 2012.

Five action programmes (for Government, energy supply, industry, buildings and appliances, and transport) are designed to help achieve the strategy targets.

Mechanisms being evaluated to achieve the increase in energy production from renewable sources include:

  • Tradable renewable energy requirements for all energy retailers;
  • Tradable renewable energy requirements specific to electricity retailers;
  • Tradable fossil fuel use restrictions for all electricity generators and other energy suppliers;
  • Support for sectors such as solar hot water and renewable industrial process heat; and
  • Voluntary measures such as negotiated industry agreements or green pricing of renewable energy.

The strategy also includes other measures such as minimum energy performance standards and labelling for generic industry equipment, sector energy efficiency studies, international benchmarking and research on woody biomass utilisation.

The action programmes are largely of a voluntary nature. However, previous initiatives, such as the Energy Wise Companies campaign, also run by EECA have proved successful, with 700 of New Zealand’s largest organisations already part of that campaign.

339 public submissions were received on the strategy, a copy of which can be viewed on line at




Submissions on the review co-ordinated by the Hon. Pete Hodgson (in culmination with the Ministry of Economic Development) on the way New Zealand’s electricity system functioned over the winter closed on 5 October 2001.

Submissions will be posted on a public website, and cross-submissions will be invited. Following the submission process, cabinet will be invited to make decisions on whether further changes are required to electricity arrangements.

The terms of reference of the review are:

  1. What factors contributed to wholesale electricity market developments in the 2001 winter?
  2. How effective were the existing market arrangements in responding to these developments?
  3. What changes should be made to market arrangements, why are these changes recommended and what are the costs and benefits?
  4. What changes to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Campaign should be considered in case the need arises in future for a similar campaign?

Submissions are posted on: There is opportunity for parties to comment on the submissions of others, and cross-submissions are due by 19 October 2001.




The Taonga Maori Protection Bill was presented to the House by the Minister of Maori Affairs, Hon. Parekura Horomia, on 6 September 2001. The Bill, currently at the Select Committee stage, was originally introduced by Tau Henare in 1996.

The Bill essentially provides for the preservation of Maori cultural heritage in New Zealand and related purposes. In particular, the Bill provides for:

  • The establishment of the Taonga Maori Trust. The Trust would assist the Ministry of Maori Development in the administration of the Taonga Maori Register, which would record the location of "taonga" (defined as physical treasures), held off-shore. The Trust would also work with the Ministry of Maori Development in arranging the return of taonga to iwi.

  • The prohibition of sale or alienation of physical Maori taonga without the prior consent of Maori through consultation.

  • The requirement for multi-national corporations and foreign companies to include in their annual reports mechanisms and initiatives pursued in the protection of taonga. In addition, prior to beginning operations in New Zealand, foreign companies would be required to illustrate their understanding of the need for the protection of taonga and a practical commitment to achieving that objective.

Before the Bill is passed, the Select Committee will need to address several important issues. For example, there is concern that the Bill limits taonga to physical cultural property, whereas Article II of the Treaty of Waitangi allows for a far wider interpretation of "taonga". In the 21 May 2001 edition of Envirolink we discussed the High Court’s consideration of the term "taonga", and whether it can include both tangible and intangible aspects, in the Blakeley v ERMA decision. Further, the Bill does not currently contain provision for Regulations to specify the detail of protection policies, or sanctions for breaching the Bill.





Arrigato Investments Limited v Auckland Regional Council (Court of Appeal, 11 September 2001)

The Court in Arrigato considered two questions of law arising from the High Court decision. One of those questions concerned the "permitted base line" test, and whether an unimplemented resource consent could be taken into account under that test.

In the July 2001 edition of Envirolink, we discussed the Court of Appeal’s decision regarding the permitted baseline test in Smith Chilcott Ltd v Martinez.

In Arrigato the Court of Appeal affirmed its earlier decision in Smith Chilcott, and stated that:

"…the permitted baseline in terms of Bayley, as supplemented by Smith Chilcott Ltd, is the existing environment overlaid with such relevant activity (not being a fanciful activity) as is permitted by the plan. Thus, if the activity permitted by the plan will create some adverse effect on the environment, that adverse effect does not count in the s104 and 105 assessments. It is part of the permitted baseline in the sense that it is deemed to be already affecting the environment or, if you like, it is not a relevant adverse effect".

The Court then turned its mind to whether the above test should be expanded so as to include unimplemented resource consent activities within the permitted baseline. There is an important difference between what is permitted under a plan and what is allowed under a resource consent, and the Court considered submissions which were made in respect of "environmental creep". That expression describes a process whereby having achieved a resource consent for a particular activity or building, a person may seek consent for something more, and try to use their existing unimplemented consent as the baseline from which the effects of the additional proposal are to be assessed.

Ultimately the Court decided that the competing contentions in this area require a flexible approach and that there could be no rigid rule either way. While what is permitted as of right by a plan is deemed to be part of the relevant environment, further assessment of the relevant environment and relevant effects are essentially questions of fact. On the facts in Arrigato, the Court held that the Environment Court did not err in taking into account Arrigato’s existing resource consent.

Dye v Auckland Regional Council (Court of Appeal, 11 September 2001)

In Dye v Auckland Regional Council, the Court of Appeal restored the Environment Court’s decision to grant a resource consent for the subdivision of land in the Rodney District. The appeal was heard immediately after Arrigato, and judgment was given contemporaneously, as essentially the same issue was in question.

As in Arrigato, the plaintiff intended to subdivide rural land.

The resource consent was granted by the Environment Court, and the case was appealed to the High Court. The High Court held that the Environment Court had misinterpreted or misunderstood the objectives and policies of the Rodney District Plan because, in its view, the Environment Court did not pay proper regard to the relevant planning documents in accordance with section 104 of the Act. To this end, it was held that the Environment Court had erred in law.

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court was not entitled to come to its decision because it was not open for the High Court to differ in its assessment of whether the subdivision was contrary to the relevant objectives and policies. The Court of Appeal stated:

"…the decision of the High Court represents more of an independent assessment by the Judge than a consideration by him of whether the conclusion to which the Environment Court came was open to it in law… The Environment Court may well have taken a different view from the Judge about whether the proposal was contrary to the objectives and policies. It was not for the Judge to differ on an appeal limited to questions of law".

After a detailed examination of the relevant policy documents the Court of Appeal held that the Environment Court was entitled in reach its conclusion and had not erred in its assessment of the subdivision under sections 104(1)(a) and 105(2A)(b).

The Court of Appeal also examined the issues of "precedent" and "cumulative" effects which were raised in the High Court. In relation to precedent effect, the High Court held that the Environment Court had erred in finding that its decision would produce no precedent effect. However, the Court of Appeal held that the Judge in the High Court had moved outside the scope of the law in considering the precedent effect of the Environment Court’s decision. It held that the granting of a resource consent had no precedent effect in the strict sense because a consent authority is not bound by a previous decision of the same or another authority. Furthermore, as no two applications are likely to ever be the same, the most that can be said is that the granting of one consent may have an influence on the other application.

On the issue of cumulative effects, the Court of Appeal found that it was not a mandatory requirement to make an area-wide assessment of all possible effects of granting of consent, as suggested by the High Court. The Court of Appeal held that the express definition of "effects" provided in section 3 was not relevant in interpreting s104(1)(a) since the purpose of that section was to address only adverse effects which were "actual" or "potential". As such, the Environment Court was not required to take into account "potential cumulative precedent effects" which would stretch the intention of Parliament beyond what was intended by the Act.




  • RMA’s 10th birthday

On 1 October 2001 it was 10 years since the Resource Management Act became law. The RMA replaced over 50 pieces of legislation, including in respect of water and soil conservation, town and country planning, coastal and geothermal management, air quality and noise control, with a single framework for environmental management and planning in New Zealand.

This overarching piece of legislation, founded on the principle of sustainable management, has drawn both criticism and support from an array of different sectors. Criticisms include a lack of central resourcing and guidance, the cost of consents, and delays at the local, and most particularly the Environment Court, levels. Improvement, in air and water quality and better effluent management, on the other hand, are considered by some to be RMA successes.

The National Party has coincided the launch of its policy on the legislation with the RMA’s 10th anniversary. Similarly, Environment Minister Hon. Marion Hobbs is expected to announce a package of amendments next month. 1 October was also to have been the date when the Resource Management Amendment Bill came into effect. The Bill however, is still sitting on Parliament’s order paper, due to significant changes being made to the Bill following the change in Government.

  • Submissions can currently be made to the Ministry for the Environment on:

  • the draft action plan for reducing dioxin discharges. Submissions close December 2001;

  • the establishment of controls for stationary tanks containing hazardous liquids. Submissions close November 2001; and

  • the draft guidelines for the management of hazardous waste. Submissions close January 2002.

  • Petrol and diesel quality standards

The Ministry of Economic Development has released a discussion paper concerning a review of petrol and diesel quality regulations. This is the first review of the Petroleum Products Specifications Regulations since they were first issued in 1998.

Submissions on the discussion paper closed on 15 October 2001.

  • Environmental standards in international trade agreements?

United States Senator Max Baucus, Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has recently proposed that countries entering trade agreements with the US must make assurances that they will not lower labour and environmental standards to distort trade.

His proposal will recommend that trade agreements should encourage US trading partners to adhere to International Labour Organisation core standards and allow restrictions on trade produced by forced labour. Senator Baucus also proposes that in the World Trade Organisation, the US should seek to negotiate rules that reflect deference to multilateral environmental agreements, and that the Bush administration demonstrate commitment to the ILO and UN environmental programs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.