New Zealand: Does the Nathans decision raise the bar for directors?

Last Updated: 12 July 2011
Article by Adam Ross, Victoria Heine, Geof Shirtcliffe, Roger Wallis and John Holland

Most Read Contributor in New Zealand, September 2016

​Findings last week of criminal liability in the Nathans Finance case echo the Centro ruling from the Australian Federal Court last month and make it clear that directors must apply their own judgement in the exercise of their duties rather than simply relying on management and expert advice.

The Nathans prosecution ( R v Moses) is the first in a series of prosecutions now making their way through the New Zealand courts involving the directors of failed finance companies. 

This Brief Counsel looks at the decision and considers its implications for directors generally.  Chapman Tripp's commentary on the Centro case is available  .

Brief background

Nathans Finance NZ Limited (Nathans) collapsed in August 2007, owing $174 million to roughly 7000 investors.  The charges against the three directors - Mervyn Ian Doolan, Kenneth Roger Moses and Donald Menzies Young – relate to misleading statements made in the company's registered prospectus and investment statement of December 13 2006, a subsequent prospectus extension statement on March 30 2007, and two letters to investors sent in July and August 2007 (the documents).

A fourth director, John Hotchin, pleaded guilty to three breaches of the Securities Act in relation to the prospectus in February this year.  Hotchin is currently serving eleven months home detention for his part in the collapse, and testified against his former fellow directors at the trial.

Nathans Finance had loaned considerable sums to parent company VTL to fund an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to break into the US vending machine market.  Key issues, in terms of inadequacy of disclosure, were the extent of this related party lending, the quality of Nathans loan-book, and the company's governance practices and liquidity.

The charges

The charges related to s 58 of the Securities Act 1978 (the Act), under which every director of a company that distributes a prospectus or advertisement (including an investment statement) that contains an "untrue statement" commits a criminal offence, punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to five years or a fine of $300,000. 

The Act deems a statement to be "untrue" where it is "misleading", either affirmatively or by omission of a material particular.  A defence is available where the director can prove, on the balance of probabilities, that "he or she had reasonable grounds to believe, and did, up to the time of the distribution of the prospectus, believe that the statement was true".

The directors argued that, in a strict literal sense, no untrue statements were made in the documents.  They also relied in the alternative on the defence that they had a reasonable belief in the truth of the statements when made.  Justice Heath was not persuaded by either of those arguments.

The decision

The test under the Securities Act is an objective one – how would the documents (as a whole) be read by a notional "prudent but non-expert investor"?  Justice Heath characterised this as someone "not expected to be financially literate (in the sense of being able to read financial statements...)" but as having "sufficient ability to comprehend competent advice" and appreciate the correlation between risk and return.

He found that:

  • while the documents acknowledged a "significant proportion" of Nathans lending was to VTL, the impression given was that those loans were arm's-length transactions on normal commercial terms, usually for no more than 12 months.  In reality, loans to VTL were consistently rolled over, and interest on them capitalised.  Furthermore, from at least June 2006, the directors knew that there was no reasonable prospect that those inter-company debts could be repaid without VTL selling all or some of its business, and that not even the interest on those debts could be paid out of VTL's income
  • statements about good governance were misleading, as "by 13 December 2006, Nathans had effectively delegated strategic decisions about its future to the board of VTL" (which had included, at various times, all of Messrs Doolan, Moses and Young).  Decisions about loans to VTL were therefore clearly not approached in the same manner as loans to other parties, and
  • the liquidity profile of the prospectus indicated inter-company indebtedness was to be paid within 12 months, which was not the case.  Statements that Nathans' liquidity was supported by VTL were also clearly erroneous as "VTL did not (and could not) support Nathans; Nathans supported VTL."

Justice Heath therefore accepted that the Crown had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the statements were misleading.

He also rejected the directors' claim that they were entitled to believe, on reasonable grounds, that the statements were true because they had relied on advice to this effect from other parties, including external advisors and senior management.

Justice Heath considered that the directors "failed, on all material occasions, to give sufficient personal attention to the content of the relevant offer document" and that this was "not a delegable duty". 

"There was a fundamental failure, on the part of all directors, to review the content of the offer documents and to ask themselves whether the information conveyed presented, to a prudent but non-expert person, an accurate impression of Nathans' business and the associated risks. That exercise should have been undertaken by excluding their own insider knowledge. That is one of the reasons why a collective approach at a board meeting would likely have resulted in a different outcome. A discussion among the directors, properly led by the chairman, was likely to tease out a number of issues of concern.

While it was fair for the directors to rely on the auditors to check aspects of the company's financial statements and to ensure that technical standards were fully met in relation to accounting policies, the accounts remained those of the directors and they had their own obligation to be satisfied of their content when signed."

"[E]ven a cursory analysis of the narrative of the investment statement and prospectus should have led the directors to the view that the impression conveyed by it was at odds with the real position, as they knew it to be." 

The broader context and implications

These cases always turn on their own, often complex, factual circumstances.  By way of illustration, as part of assessing the directors' defence of reasonable belief, Justice Heath traverses considerable detail regarding the state of VTL's business interests in the US and Australia.  So the precedential impact of the decision should not be overstated.

Some broader points of interest do, however, arise.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey  [2011] FCA 717

Justice Heath's overall approach, including his view that independent consideration of the accuracy of financial statements is a non-delegable duty of the directors of a finance company, is consistent with that of the Australian Federal Court in the Centro case. 

Both decisions were welcomed by the relevant regulator in each jurisdiction.  The Australian Securities and Investments Commission described Centro as a "landmark decision" and the Financial Markets Authority said that the Nathans judgment "reinforced the responsibility that every director of an issuer has to provide truthful and complete information to investors". 

Such regulatory successes on both sides of the Tasman are likely, once again, to remind directors of their statutory responsibilities, and cause them to ensure they have appropriate processes in the discharge of those responsibilities.

External advice

In comparison with Judge Doogue in  MED v Feeney, Justice Heath places little emphasis on external advice received by the directors, including from their solicitors.  This seems to be driven largely by the circumstances of the case, as it appears that legal advisers were not fully involved in the final discussions before the prospectus and investment statement were approved. 

Justice Heath notes that some advice from the solicitors was not forwarded to the directors by Nathans' in house lawyer, and observes that

"The quality of any advice is only as good as the information provided to the professional, on the basis of which he or she is asked to advise.  In considering the extent to which directors are entitled to rely on external advice, some assessment must be made of the prime information on which the adviser acted and whether he or she was on inquiry as to the accuracy of that information."

This is consistent with other recent decisions, such as the  James Hardie litigation in Australia, which has emphasised that the reasonableness of reliance on experts depends very much on what those experts have been told.

Financial literacy

In Justice Heath's view, directors of finance companies must be financially literate:

"It is axiomatic that a director of a finance company will be assumed to have the ability to read and understand financial statements and the way in which assets and liabilities are classified...  Such requirements are not unduly oppressive; nor could they be said to act as a disincentive to qualified persons acting as directors of finance companies. They represent no more than the basic level of understanding needed to run a finance company, which any investor would expect a director to have".

At first sight, this approach might seem inconsistent with Judge Doogue's decision in  MED v Feeney (Feltex).  But Feltex concerned a specific issue (characterisation of liabilities as term or current) in the context of Feltex's transition to new accounting standards.  Justice Heath's comments, in contrast, are directed more generally to the requirement for all finance company directors to have sufficient general financial literacy properly to monitor the company's business.

Justice Heath cites with approval similar comments from Justice Miller earlier this year in Davidson v Registrar of Companies.  Justice Miller said:

"A director must understand the fundamentals of the business, monitor performance and review financial statements regularly.  It follows that a degree of financial literacy is required of any director of a finance company. Without it, Mr Davidson could scarcely understand the business, let alone contribute to policy decisions."

It should not be assumed that directors of companies which are not finance companies need not bother about being so financially literate.  The point, rather, is that the courts will expect every director to have sufficient financial literacy to understand, monitor and guide the business of his or her company.  Exactly what that means may depend on the nature of the business.  But it is now clear, if it wasn't before, that any director who thinks "I don't really understand financial statements, but am here to contribute in other areas" needs to think again. 

Law reform

One of the major focuses of the Government's ongoing Securities Law Review is on liability for directors in situations such as this.  While criminal sanctions continue to be contemplated in the area, current proposals are to limit this to "the most egregious breaches" of directors' duties, and to deal with lesser offences through civil penalties.  The extent to which these policy debates will influence the sentencing of the Nathans directors, due in September, remains to be seen.

Our thanks to Michael Dobson for writing this Brief Counsel. For further information, please contact the lawyers featured 

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Roger Wallis
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.