New Zealand: Does the Nathans decision raise the bar for directors?

​Findings last week of criminal liability in the Nathans Finance case echo the Centro ruling from the Australian Federal Court last month and make it clear that directors must apply their own judgement in the exercise of their duties rather than simply relying on management and expert advice.

The Nathans prosecution ( R v Moses) is the first in a series of prosecutions now making their way through the New Zealand courts involving the directors of failed finance companies. 

This Brief Counsel looks at the decision and considers its implications for directors generally.  Chapman Tripp's commentary on the Centro case is available  .

Brief background

Nathans Finance NZ Limited (Nathans) collapsed in August 2007, owing $174 million to roughly 7000 investors.  The charges against the three directors - Mervyn Ian Doolan, Kenneth Roger Moses and Donald Menzies Young – relate to misleading statements made in the company's registered prospectus and investment statement of December 13 2006, a subsequent prospectus extension statement on March 30 2007, and two letters to investors sent in July and August 2007 (the documents).

A fourth director, John Hotchin, pleaded guilty to three breaches of the Securities Act in relation to the prospectus in February this year.  Hotchin is currently serving eleven months home detention for his part in the collapse, and testified against his former fellow directors at the trial.

Nathans Finance had loaned considerable sums to parent company VTL to fund an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to break into the US vending machine market.  Key issues, in terms of inadequacy of disclosure, were the extent of this related party lending, the quality of Nathans loan-book, and the company's governance practices and liquidity.

The charges

The charges related to s 58 of the Securities Act 1978 (the Act), under which every director of a company that distributes a prospectus or advertisement (including an investment statement) that contains an "untrue statement" commits a criminal offence, punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to five years or a fine of $300,000. 

The Act deems a statement to be "untrue" where it is "misleading", either affirmatively or by omission of a material particular.  A defence is available where the director can prove, on the balance of probabilities, that "he or she had reasonable grounds to believe, and did, up to the time of the distribution of the prospectus, believe that the statement was true".

The directors argued that, in a strict literal sense, no untrue statements were made in the documents.  They also relied in the alternative on the defence that they had a reasonable belief in the truth of the statements when made.  Justice Heath was not persuaded by either of those arguments.

The decision

The test under the Securities Act is an objective one – how would the documents (as a whole) be read by a notional "prudent but non-expert investor"?  Justice Heath characterised this as someone "not expected to be financially literate (in the sense of being able to read financial statements...)" but as having "sufficient ability to comprehend competent advice" and appreciate the correlation between risk and return.

He found that:

  • while the documents acknowledged a "significant proportion" of Nathans lending was to VTL, the impression given was that those loans were arm's-length transactions on normal commercial terms, usually for no more than 12 months.  In reality, loans to VTL were consistently rolled over, and interest on them capitalised.  Furthermore, from at least June 2006, the directors knew that there was no reasonable prospect that those inter-company debts could be repaid without VTL selling all or some of its business, and that not even the interest on those debts could be paid out of VTL's income
  • statements about good governance were misleading, as "by 13 December 2006, Nathans had effectively delegated strategic decisions about its future to the board of VTL" (which had included, at various times, all of Messrs Doolan, Moses and Young).  Decisions about loans to VTL were therefore clearly not approached in the same manner as loans to other parties, and
  • the liquidity profile of the prospectus indicated inter-company indebtedness was to be paid within 12 months, which was not the case.  Statements that Nathans' liquidity was supported by VTL were also clearly erroneous as "VTL did not (and could not) support Nathans; Nathans supported VTL."

Justice Heath therefore accepted that the Crown had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the statements were misleading.

He also rejected the directors' claim that they were entitled to believe, on reasonable grounds, that the statements were true because they had relied on advice to this effect from other parties, including external advisors and senior management.

Justice Heath considered that the directors "failed, on all material occasions, to give sufficient personal attention to the content of the relevant offer document" and that this was "not a delegable duty". 

"There was a fundamental failure, on the part of all directors, to review the content of the offer documents and to ask themselves whether the information conveyed presented, to a prudent but non-expert person, an accurate impression of Nathans' business and the associated risks. That exercise should have been undertaken by excluding their own insider knowledge. That is one of the reasons why a collective approach at a board meeting would likely have resulted in a different outcome. A discussion among the directors, properly led by the chairman, was likely to tease out a number of issues of concern.

While it was fair for the directors to rely on the auditors to check aspects of the company's financial statements and to ensure that technical standards were fully met in relation to accounting policies, the accounts remained those of the directors and they had their own obligation to be satisfied of their content when signed."

"[E]ven a cursory analysis of the narrative of the investment statement and prospectus should have led the directors to the view that the impression conveyed by it was at odds with the real position, as they knew it to be." 

The broader context and implications

These cases always turn on their own, often complex, factual circumstances.  By way of illustration, as part of assessing the directors' defence of reasonable belief, Justice Heath traverses considerable detail regarding the state of VTL's business interests in the US and Australia.  So the precedential impact of the decision should not be overstated.

Some broader points of interest do, however, arise.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey  [2011] FCA 717

Justice Heath's overall approach, including his view that independent consideration of the accuracy of financial statements is a non-delegable duty of the directors of a finance company, is consistent with that of the Australian Federal Court in the Centro case. 

Both decisions were welcomed by the relevant regulator in each jurisdiction.  The Australian Securities and Investments Commission described Centro as a "landmark decision" and the Financial Markets Authority said that the Nathans judgment "reinforced the responsibility that every director of an issuer has to provide truthful and complete information to investors". 

Such regulatory successes on both sides of the Tasman are likely, once again, to remind directors of their statutory responsibilities, and cause them to ensure they have appropriate processes in the discharge of those responsibilities.

External advice

In comparison with Judge Doogue in  MED v Feeney, Justice Heath places little emphasis on external advice received by the directors, including from their solicitors.  This seems to be driven largely by the circumstances of the case, as it appears that legal advisers were not fully involved in the final discussions before the prospectus and investment statement were approved. 

Justice Heath notes that some advice from the solicitors was not forwarded to the directors by Nathans' in house lawyer, and observes that

"The quality of any advice is only as good as the information provided to the professional, on the basis of which he or she is asked to advise.  In considering the extent to which directors are entitled to rely on external advice, some assessment must be made of the prime information on which the adviser acted and whether he or she was on inquiry as to the accuracy of that information."

This is consistent with other recent decisions, such as the  James Hardie litigation in Australia, which has emphasised that the reasonableness of reliance on experts depends very much on what those experts have been told.

Financial literacy

In Justice Heath's view, directors of finance companies must be financially literate:

"It is axiomatic that a director of a finance company will be assumed to have the ability to read and understand financial statements and the way in which assets and liabilities are classified...  Such requirements are not unduly oppressive; nor could they be said to act as a disincentive to qualified persons acting as directors of finance companies. They represent no more than the basic level of understanding needed to run a finance company, which any investor would expect a director to have".

At first sight, this approach might seem inconsistent with Judge Doogue's decision in  MED v Feeney (Feltex).  But Feltex concerned a specific issue (characterisation of liabilities as term or current) in the context of Feltex's transition to new accounting standards.  Justice Heath's comments, in contrast, are directed more generally to the requirement for all finance company directors to have sufficient general financial literacy properly to monitor the company's business.

Justice Heath cites with approval similar comments from Justice Miller earlier this year in Davidson v Registrar of Companies.  Justice Miller said:

"A director must understand the fundamentals of the business, monitor performance and review financial statements regularly.  It follows that a degree of financial literacy is required of any director of a finance company. Without it, Mr Davidson could scarcely understand the business, let alone contribute to policy decisions."

It should not be assumed that directors of companies which are not finance companies need not bother about being so financially literate.  The point, rather, is that the courts will expect every director to have sufficient financial literacy to understand, monitor and guide the business of his or her company.  Exactly what that means may depend on the nature of the business.  But it is now clear, if it wasn't before, that any director who thinks "I don't really understand financial statements, but am here to contribute in other areas" needs to think again. 

Law reform

One of the major focuses of the Government's ongoing Securities Law Review is on liability for directors in situations such as this.  While criminal sanctions continue to be contemplated in the area, current proposals are to limit this to "the most egregious breaches" of directors' duties, and to deal with lesser offences through civil penalties.  The extent to which these policy debates will influence the sentencing of the Nathans directors, due in September, remains to be seen.

Our thanks to Michael Dobson for writing this Brief Counsel. For further information, please contact the lawyers featured 

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Roger Wallis
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions