New Zealand: Software patents in NZ: widespread criticism of proposed exclusion and examination guidelines

Last Updated: 23 June 2011
Article by Jonathan Lucas

The future of software patents in New Zealand remains in doubt following an almost unanimous rejection of a proposal to exclude computer-implemented inventions from patentability in a recent public consultation. 

The Ministry of Economic Development (MED) sought public opinion on draft guidelines that are intended to be used to examine patent applications for computer-related inventions in New Zealand. The public has responded with resounding disapproval of both the proposal and draft guidelines. 

The guidelines were published by the MED following a  recommendation from the Commerce Select Committee (CSC) that software should be excluded from patentability by introducing clause 15(3A) into the Patents Bill, which states that "computer software is not a patentable invention". The CSC wanted guidelines to be developed that would, however, permit protection for "embedded" software inventions. The software exclusion was proposed because the CSC is of the opinion that software patents do not encourage innovation and have a negative effect on New Zealand society.

Who made submissions?

James & Wells was one of the first to publish its submissions to the draft guidelines. We question the CSC's justification for clause 15(3A) and recommend that it be removed entirely. But, if it is to be kept, our view is that the guidelines will need a substantial re-write. 

Now, the MED has published all 36 submissions that were made. The submissions come from a variety of sources, which broadly fall into the following groups:

  • Innovative New Zealand companies such as Auckland UniServices, Airways New Zealand, Fisher& Paykel Appliances, Thermal Chemistry Limited and Air New Zealand, as well as two Crown Research Institutes.
  • New Zealand business groups such as NZICT Group, Business Software Alliance and BusinessNZ. These groups collectively represent a large number of New Zealand businesses across many fields.
  • Large international technology companies like Microsoft, Intel and Qualcomm.
  • Patent experts in New Zealand and abroad, including the New Zealand Institute of Patent Attorneys (NZIPA), the Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia (IPTA) and the International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (FICPI). Along with James & Wells, other New Zealand patent attorney and law firms also made submissions.

Perhaps the most telling submissions are those of the first group in the above list. These are New Zealand companies that are actively innovating using software and benefiting the country's economy as a result. The fact that these companies have criticised the proposed exclusion and the guidelines is significant. Innovators want to be able to protect their software-related advances because they see a benefit in doing so. This is contrary to the CSC's justification for proposing the exclusion. 

Also significant is that many of the companies concerned about the affect of clause 15(3A), such as Auckland UniServices, Air New Zealand and Thermal Chemistry Limited, are not specialist software developers. The proposals affect innovative businesses in many fields, not solely those in the ICT sector.

Some people have questioned the motivation of patent attorneys and law firms in supporting the ability to protect computer-implemented inventions using patents because there is a view that this support is for self gain. However, a law firm's primary allegiance is to its clients and no firm would put forward an opinion that was not shared by the companies it represents.

Overall, a diverse mix of entities, public and private, Kiwi and foreign, made submissions, showing that this is a broad-reaching issue in which many have an interest.

What views were expressed?

The following points came out as representative of the submissions: 

  • The majority wanted clause 15(3A) to be deleted entirely, so that software inventions would remain patentable in New Zealand. This is despite the fact the MED tried to discourage comments on clause 15(3A) itself.
  • Most expressed their concern at the lack of clarity provided by the combination of clause 15(3A) and the draft guidelines. This lack of clarity stems from inconsistency in the wording of clause 15(3A) compared to its intent, the questionable legal standing of guidelines in the face of apparently clear legislative wording and the absence of case law based on equivalent laws in other jurisdictions.
  • Most thought that, if they were to be retained, the guidelines required amendment. Of those who suggested changes, most wanted the guidelines to adopt the European approach for examining such applications. Some wanted closer alignment with Australian procedure. 

Only four of the 36 submissions could be construed as supporting a legislative restriction on software patents in some form, although only one of the submissions found no fault in the draft examination guidelines. Yet again, those favouring the exclusion could not provide any concrete evidence of economic harm to New Zealand if computer-implemented inventions remain patentable. On the contrary, the submissions suggest that the patentability of such inventions economically benefits the country.

Where next for software patents in New Zealand?

The MED has failed to produce examination guidelines that provide a clear position on what is patentable and what is not patentable under the proposed exclusion. But to be fair to the MED, it was given an impossible task by the CSC, which either does not appreciate the hole it is digging for patent reform in New Zealand or chooses to ignore it.

If there is to be no amendment of clause 15(3A), the submissions suggest that the European approach to examining applications will give the clearest position to stakeholders and best meet the intent of the provision.

However, we think that the government should take heed of the submissions made on this issue and re-consider the reform proposed by the CSC. There has been no adequate public survey of whether the Patents Bill should exclude computer-implemented inventions. Given the opposition to clause 15(3A) in these submissions (despite the MED discouraging comments on clause 15(3A) itself), public support of the exclusion is clearly not assured.

The Patents Bill is still awaiting its second reading in parliament and this will provide an opportunity to prevent a flawed law being passed. However, with a general election looming, patent reform is unlikely to be a pressing issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

James and Wells is the 2010 New Zealand Law Awards winner of the Intellectual Property Law Award for excellence in client service.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
James & Wells Intellectual Property
James & Wells Intellectual Property
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
James & Wells Intellectual Property
James & Wells Intellectual Property
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions