New Zealand: Caveat emptor and other lessons from the Crafar receivership

Last Updated: 9 May 2011
Article by Michael Arthur

Big receiverships often test legal boundaries, and the Crafar group receivership is no exception.  Gibson & Stiassny v StockCo & Ors1  is the longest decision to date on the Personal Property Securities Act 1999 (PPSA). 

Although the facts are complex, the practical take-outs are fairly simple:

check the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) before making large purchases

  • update your PPSA registration immediately you have any reason to believe that your secured property might not be in the debtor's possession, and

clearly identify any property to be bought, sold or charged.

This is the first of a series of three Brief Counsels, each of which will explore one of these lessons in the context of the case.

Background

A Crafar group company, Nugen Farms Limited (Nugen), leased around 5,600 cows from StockCo Limited (StockCo), a rural financier.  Of those cows, 4,000 heifers had been purchased by StockCo from another Crafar company, Plateau Farms Limited (Plateau).  Plateau, in common with other Crafar group companies, had granted general security over all of its assets to the banks who funded the Crafar group business and who ultimately appointed the receivers (the banks).

At the time the receivers were appointed all the livestock leased to Nugen was being grazed on land owned by other Crafar-related companies, under grazing arrangements between Nugen and those other companies.  None of the livestock was on Nugen land. 

The main issues were:

  • Brief Counsel 1 – whether the heifers Plateau sold StockCo were sold in the ordinary course of Plateau's business, in which case StockCo would take the heifers free of the banks' security interest
  • Brief Counsel 2 – how to deal with the problem that certain cows claimed by StockCo could not be clearly identified as having been sold to StockCo by Plateau due to the fact that they had never been distinguished from the main Crafar group herd, and
  • Brief Counsel 3 – how to deal with the fact that under the PPSA the livestock could be considered to be the assets of both Nugen and of the companies on whose land the cows were being grazed.

The ordinary course of business rule

Under section 53 of the PPSA, a purchaser of goods from a company takes those goods free of any security interest when the goods are sold in the ordinary course of the company's business, and the purchaser is not aware that the sale is in breach of a security agreement. 

This is one of a number of provisions in the PPSA designed to facilitate ordinary business and to preserve the utility of 'floating' security, which (subject to the precise terms of the security agreement) sees the security interest in inventory attaching to and detaching from goods as they pass in and out of the company's possession during the normal course of its business.

The rule has expected consequences where the business of the vendor is well understood by all parties.  If an appliance dealer sells a fridge (even at a discount price)  it makes sense that the customer takes the fridge free of any security held by the dealer's bank, even where the security extends to all the dealer's inventory.  These simple cases are fair to all participants: the customer has peace of mind, the dealer can conduct its core business without extra paperwork, and the bank is still able to predict the value of its general security position. 

But things become less clear cut if our appliance dealer starts a sideline, say selling-down its old computer system to free up funds.  In this case the customer and the bank might have different expectations about whether a sale was within the vendor's ordinary course of business.

Ascertaining a seller's ordinary course of business is a factual enquiry as to the seller's business at the time of the sale.  In Gibson v StockCo, White J followed prior New Zealand cases in holding that the test is wholly objective: that it asks what the seller's business actually was at the time of sale, not what the customer or the lender thought.  Determining whether a transaction was within the seller's ordinary business requires reference to all the factual circumstances, including whether the transaction was of an isolated type, and whether the sale was part of a wider transaction that was out of the ordinary.

The heifers sold by Plateau to StockCo

In Gibson v StockCo it was not disputed that Plateau's business included buying and selling livestock.  The Court acknowledged that "[a]t one level and without considering all the circumstances of the transaction the answer could be in the affirmative in that a livestock sale, apparently at arm's-length and for fair market value, was in the ordinary course of business of Plateau". 

However, on closer analysis, the Court considered that the sale of the 4,000 heifers to StockCo was exceptional for a variety of reasons:

  • there was an absence of direct economic benefit to Plateau, and the price was discounted
  • the sale was part of a wider transaction to reformulate the group's finances by enabling Plateau urgently to obtain funds to lend, unsecured and undocumented, to Nugen (the making of which loan caused Plateau to breach its banking covenants)
  • Plateau sold all of its 'rising year one' heifers, something that had not taken place before, and
  • the process of negotiation was out of the ordinary, including involvement from Plateau's and StockCo's respective principal directors.

Did the banks expressly or impliedly authorise the transaction?

Had the banks expressly or impliedly consented to the sale, their security interest in the heifers would have ceased.2   But the Court found that they had not authorised the sale, primarily because there was no evidence that they were aware of it or of its purpose. 

Had the sale been in the ordinary course of Plateau's business, the banks' security agreement would have automatically released the heifers.  But the Court found that the sale was outside the ordinary course of business for the reasons set out above.

A prior case had held that authorisation could be inferred where the lender had allowed previous transactions of the same type, but here there were no prior similar transactions. 

Also, witnesses for the Crafar group acknowledged that they would not have expected the banks to authorise the sale given that the proceeds were not to be used to reduce debt but to fund further property purchases. 

Take-outs

Lessons for purchasers 

The Judge underlined that purchasers in large transactions should expect to look into the existence of security interests.  If the sales are outside the debtor/vendor's ordinary business, a purchaser's claim may be inferior to that of an existing secured party of the debtor, despite the payment of fair value.

If in doubt, purchasers should check the PPSR.  StockCo relied on Alan Crafar's assurance that the sale of the heifers was in the ordinary course of Plateau's business, but clearly that was not enough in this case.  In a non-retail situation where the transaction is of sufficiently high value and there is any concern as to the applicability of section 53, the purchaser can make enquiries and seek releases or confirmations from any secured party who is registered and whose security interest extends to the asset in question.  

Lessons for secured lenders

Secured lenders need to be aware that a debtor's ordinary business may change without the lender's knowledge and those changes may alter how the PPSA rules apply.  Security agreements may impose requirements on debtors that mitigate the risk of the debtor's business changing without the lender's knowledge.  However, these provide practical protection only, and secured lenders should make sure that they are up to date with the actual nature of their debtor's business, especially as it might relate to the disposal of significant charged assets.

Our thanks to Richard May, Solicitor, for writing this Brief Counsel.

For further information, please contact the lawyers featured.

Footnote

  1. Gibson & Stiassny v StockCo & Ors (unreported) 17 December 2010, Auckland High Court CIV-2009-404-7120.
  2. PPSA s45.
  3. Motorworld Limited (In Liquidation) v Turners Auctions Limited (unreported) 17 February 2010, Auckland High Court, CIV-2010-404-6558.

Related topics:

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Lessons from the Crafar receivership: Part Two for the next article.
Authors
Michael Arthur
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions