Isle of Man: Trust Expenses: Income Or Capital?

Last Updated: 22 January 2009
Article by John Rimmer




A discretionary trust was established with four trustees: two were described by the family as the "non-executive" trustees, one was an "executive trustee" (an accountant), so described in contrast to the non-executive trustees, and the fourth was a family company. The non-executive trustees charged fixed fees. The executive trustee charged on a time basis. In 2000-2001 the trustees' fees were in the region of £47,000.00, of which approximately £42,000.00 was charged by the executive trustee and £5,000.00 by the non-executive trustees.

There were three investment managers of the trust, each with their own custodian company. The investment managers charged fees on a percentage rate.

The case related to whether the trustees were entitled to set any of the following against trust income1:-

  1. Executive trustee fees
  2. Non-executive trustee fees
  3. Investment management fees
  4. Custodian charges
  5. Bank charges
  6. Professional fees for accountancy and administration


The Special Commissioners had held that there was no underlying principal that expenditure for the benefit of income and capital as a whole was allocable against capital alone: they thought that there was an underlying principal of fairness between the income and capital beneficiaries. Accordingly, apart from investment management fees, they thought that it was fair to allocate part of the expenses to income on the basis of fairness between the different classes of beneficiary.

The High Court thought that the Special Commissioners were wrong and found that the decision in Carver v Duncan [1985] 1 AC 1082 decided the position and was binding upon it. Consequently, the court decided that trust capital would bear the costs, expenses and charges incurred for the benefit of the whole trust estate, income and capital. The court rejected the "fairness" argument and held that the Special Commissioners had erred in law.

In the High Court proceedings, however, HMRC had accepted that, "consistently with the principle that all costs, charges and expenses incurred for the benefit for the whole estate must, necessarily, be treated as of a capital nature", it would be possible to apportion bank charges, accountancy fees2 and custodian fees if it would be possible to attribute part to income alone. The judge in the High Court did not look at why HMRC accepted those principles in relation to certain types of expense by comparison with the other types.

The High Court also held that the trustees were correct in allocating expenses on an accruals basis.

The Court of Appeal found a mid-line between the views of the other Special Commissioners and the High Court. It thought that the Special Commissioners were wrong to say that Carver did not lay down a general principal that expenses incurred for the benefit of the estate over a whole (income and capital) could only be set against capital. Having considered two cases, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Special Commissioners were wrong to say that Carver did not lay down a general principal. They held that:-

  1. expenses incurred for the benefit of capital alone were to be set against capital.
  2. expenses incurred for the benefit of income alone were to be set against income.
  3. expenses incurred for the benefit of both capital and income were to be set against capital alone.

In the first case (In re Bennett [1896] 1 Ch 778), expenses for an annual audit were held to be for the benefit of both life tenant and remaindermen (capital beneficiaries) since both benefited from supervision of the trustees and, whilst the funds would initially be offset against capital alone, the income beneficiary would lose the benefit of future income from the expended capital. Again, in Carver v Duncan, where life assurance premiums and professional investment management fees were paid, the court thought that it was fair to set them not against income but against capital, because they were incurred for the benefit of the estate as a whole. The life assurance policies would inure to the benefit not just of the capital funds but also the income funds in the sense that, when they gave rise to benefits, they would also augment the trust fund and, in turn, increase the amount of income. Similarly, annual fees paid to investment advisors were for the benefit of the estate as a whole because this affected the future value of the trust funds and, in turn, the future level of income arising from the capital. Hence, Sir John Chadwick, in the Court of Appeal, said that,

"it is, I think, beyond argument that an expense is incurred 'for the benefit of the whole estate' in the present context when the purpose or objects for which that expense is incurred is to confer benefits both on the income beneficiaries and on those entitled to capital on the determination of the income trust."

He went on to say, at paragraph 29, that,

"It is only those expenses which are incurred exclusively for the benefit of the income beneficiaries that may be charged against income."

By the time of the hearing in the Court of Appeal, HMRC had resiled from parts of their case; they accepted that they

"[did] not contend that the rule is all or nothing, precluding the apportionment of a single expense. But apportionment is not based upon the general principle of achieving fairness between beneficiaries. Instead it is based upon the ability to demonstrate that part of the expense relates to the trustee's due to the income beneficiaries alone. That is, if it can be shown that an identified or identifiable part of an expense is for work carried out for the benefit of the income beneficiaries alone, then that part is properly chargeable to income."

Sir John Chadwick said that he regarded that as a correct statement of the general law.

Against that background, the Court of Appeal found that it was possible to allocate part of an expense against income in respect of the executive trustee fees, professional fees and bank charges.

There remained only two sets of expenses in dispute; the non-executive trustees' fees and the fees of the investment managers. Overruling both the Special Commissioners and the High Court, the Court of Appeal held that there was nothing in principle to prevent the non-executive trustees' fees from being allocated against income to the extent that it could be shown that their work related to income beneficiaries. The fact that they charged a fixed fee and did not charge on a time basis (unlike the executive trustee) should not preclude an apportionment. However, the onus would be on the trustees to demonstrate that part of their fees ought to be offset against income. Sir John Chadwick added at paragraph 38 that,

"it is, I think, no answer to say that, in the absence of time records, determination of that proportion will, necessarily, be imprecise: a realistic estimate can be made."

Turning to the investment management fees, the trustees accepted that advice as to the investment of capital or of accumulated income ought to be offset against capital alone. The trustees had argued that income that the trustees had resolved to accumulate, but which they had not yet "actually" accumulated by investing it, still represented income for the purposes of the allocation of investment management expenses. This found no favour with the Court of Appeal: Sir John agreed with the High Court judge and the Special Commissioners who thought that, once the trustees had resolved to accumulate the income, the monies to be accumulated ought properly to be regarded as capital, so that the expenses incurred in connection with the investment of those monies should not be said to be chargeable to income. He added that the position might be otherwise if the trustees were temporarily investing income whilst deciding whether to accumulate it.

Lloyd and Arden LJJ delivered concurring judgements. Arden LJ added that the onus of showing that some of the fees of the non-executive trustees related to advice for the exclusive benefit of income beneficiaries rested on the trustees.


In summary, the following rules can be stated:

  1. There is nothing in the nature of a trust expense (e.g. investment management, accountancy, etc.) that, of itself, determines whether it must be allocated against capital or income – the matter is determined by those beneficiaries for whose benefit that expense is incurred.
  2. If an expense is incurred for capital beneficiaries or for the benefit of capital and income beneficiaries, it must be allocated to capital.
  3. If an expense is incurred, or a part of an expense can be identified as being incurred, exclusively for income beneficiaries, it should be allocated against income. But the onus will be on the trustees (at least as regards taxation issues) to justify any allocation against income.

Trustees will need to consider in light of the Clay case (a) how to record and allocate expenses going forward and (b) whether they need to re-visit the allocation of expenses in previous years.


1. In this case the allocation was of particular concern since it affected the tax liabilities – in other cases, it may be particularly important if the income and capital beneficiaries are different.

2. And, the Court of Appeal thought, other professional fees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions