Isle of Man: Trust Expenses: Income Or Capital?

Last Updated: 22 January 2009
Article by John Rimmer




A discretionary trust was established with four trustees: two were described by the family as the "non-executive" trustees, one was an "executive trustee" (an accountant), so described in contrast to the non-executive trustees, and the fourth was a family company. The non-executive trustees charged fixed fees. The executive trustee charged on a time basis. In 2000-2001 the trustees' fees were in the region of £47,000.00, of which approximately £42,000.00 was charged by the executive trustee and £5,000.00 by the non-executive trustees.

There were three investment managers of the trust, each with their own custodian company. The investment managers charged fees on a percentage rate.

The case related to whether the trustees were entitled to set any of the following against trust income1:-

  1. Executive trustee fees
  2. Non-executive trustee fees
  3. Investment management fees
  4. Custodian charges
  5. Bank charges
  6. Professional fees for accountancy and administration


The Special Commissioners had held that there was no underlying principal that expenditure for the benefit of income and capital as a whole was allocable against capital alone: they thought that there was an underlying principal of fairness between the income and capital beneficiaries. Accordingly, apart from investment management fees, they thought that it was fair to allocate part of the expenses to income on the basis of fairness between the different classes of beneficiary.

The High Court thought that the Special Commissioners were wrong and found that the decision in Carver v Duncan [1985] 1 AC 1082 decided the position and was binding upon it. Consequently, the court decided that trust capital would bear the costs, expenses and charges incurred for the benefit of the whole trust estate, income and capital. The court rejected the "fairness" argument and held that the Special Commissioners had erred in law.

In the High Court proceedings, however, HMRC had accepted that, "consistently with the principle that all costs, charges and expenses incurred for the benefit for the whole estate must, necessarily, be treated as of a capital nature", it would be possible to apportion bank charges, accountancy fees2 and custodian fees if it would be possible to attribute part to income alone. The judge in the High Court did not look at why HMRC accepted those principles in relation to certain types of expense by comparison with the other types.

The High Court also held that the trustees were correct in allocating expenses on an accruals basis.

The Court of Appeal found a mid-line between the views of the other Special Commissioners and the High Court. It thought that the Special Commissioners were wrong to say that Carver did not lay down a general principal that expenses incurred for the benefit of the estate over a whole (income and capital) could only be set against capital. Having considered two cases, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Special Commissioners were wrong to say that Carver did not lay down a general principal. They held that:-

  1. expenses incurred for the benefit of capital alone were to be set against capital.
  2. expenses incurred for the benefit of income alone were to be set against income.
  3. expenses incurred for the benefit of both capital and income were to be set against capital alone.

In the first case (In re Bennett [1896] 1 Ch 778), expenses for an annual audit were held to be for the benefit of both life tenant and remaindermen (capital beneficiaries) since both benefited from supervision of the trustees and, whilst the funds would initially be offset against capital alone, the income beneficiary would lose the benefit of future income from the expended capital. Again, in Carver v Duncan, where life assurance premiums and professional investment management fees were paid, the court thought that it was fair to set them not against income but against capital, because they were incurred for the benefit of the estate as a whole. The life assurance policies would inure to the benefit not just of the capital funds but also the income funds in the sense that, when they gave rise to benefits, they would also augment the trust fund and, in turn, increase the amount of income. Similarly, annual fees paid to investment advisors were for the benefit of the estate as a whole because this affected the future value of the trust funds and, in turn, the future level of income arising from the capital. Hence, Sir John Chadwick, in the Court of Appeal, said that,

"it is, I think, beyond argument that an expense is incurred 'for the benefit of the whole estate' in the present context when the purpose or objects for which that expense is incurred is to confer benefits both on the income beneficiaries and on those entitled to capital on the determination of the income trust."

He went on to say, at paragraph 29, that,

"It is only those expenses which are incurred exclusively for the benefit of the income beneficiaries that may be charged against income."

By the time of the hearing in the Court of Appeal, HMRC had resiled from parts of their case; they accepted that they

"[did] not contend that the rule is all or nothing, precluding the apportionment of a single expense. But apportionment is not based upon the general principle of achieving fairness between beneficiaries. Instead it is based upon the ability to demonstrate that part of the expense relates to the trustee's due to the income beneficiaries alone. That is, if it can be shown that an identified or identifiable part of an expense is for work carried out for the benefit of the income beneficiaries alone, then that part is properly chargeable to income."

Sir John Chadwick said that he regarded that as a correct statement of the general law.

Against that background, the Court of Appeal found that it was possible to allocate part of an expense against income in respect of the executive trustee fees, professional fees and bank charges.

There remained only two sets of expenses in dispute; the non-executive trustees' fees and the fees of the investment managers. Overruling both the Special Commissioners and the High Court, the Court of Appeal held that there was nothing in principle to prevent the non-executive trustees' fees from being allocated against income to the extent that it could be shown that their work related to income beneficiaries. The fact that they charged a fixed fee and did not charge on a time basis (unlike the executive trustee) should not preclude an apportionment. However, the onus would be on the trustees to demonstrate that part of their fees ought to be offset against income. Sir John Chadwick added at paragraph 38 that,

"it is, I think, no answer to say that, in the absence of time records, determination of that proportion will, necessarily, be imprecise: a realistic estimate can be made."

Turning to the investment management fees, the trustees accepted that advice as to the investment of capital or of accumulated income ought to be offset against capital alone. The trustees had argued that income that the trustees had resolved to accumulate, but which they had not yet "actually" accumulated by investing it, still represented income for the purposes of the allocation of investment management expenses. This found no favour with the Court of Appeal: Sir John agreed with the High Court judge and the Special Commissioners who thought that, once the trustees had resolved to accumulate the income, the monies to be accumulated ought properly to be regarded as capital, so that the expenses incurred in connection with the investment of those monies should not be said to be chargeable to income. He added that the position might be otherwise if the trustees were temporarily investing income whilst deciding whether to accumulate it.

Lloyd and Arden LJJ delivered concurring judgements. Arden LJ added that the onus of showing that some of the fees of the non-executive trustees related to advice for the exclusive benefit of income beneficiaries rested on the trustees.


In summary, the following rules can be stated:

  1. There is nothing in the nature of a trust expense (e.g. investment management, accountancy, etc.) that, of itself, determines whether it must be allocated against capital or income – the matter is determined by those beneficiaries for whose benefit that expense is incurred.
  2. If an expense is incurred for capital beneficiaries or for the benefit of capital and income beneficiaries, it must be allocated to capital.
  3. If an expense is incurred, or a part of an expense can be identified as being incurred, exclusively for income beneficiaries, it should be allocated against income. But the onus will be on the trustees (at least as regards taxation issues) to justify any allocation against income.

Trustees will need to consider in light of the Clay case (a) how to record and allocate expenses going forward and (b) whether they need to re-visit the allocation of expenses in previous years.


1. In this case the allocation was of particular concern since it affected the tax liabilities – in other cases, it may be particularly important if the income and capital beneficiaries are different.

2. And, the Court of Appeal thought, other professional fees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.