Isle of Man: Sham Trusts - An Isle Of Man Perspective

Last Updated: 29 April 2008
Article by Gillian Christian

Trusts are no longer simple vehicles whereby the Trustee holds trust property for a beneficiary in order that the family wealth may be preserved for future generations. A 'trustee industry' has been developed and with it a variety of sophisticated tools which can allow the settlor to shelter his assets from taxes and many other necessary evils.

We have moved on from the days when a settlor would simply elect his friend to be trustee, with the trustee in most cases providing his services gratuitously. As there is usually no personal link between the settlor and the trustee, the settlor can no longer be confident that the trustee will simply act in complete accordance with his wishes and so will try to retain as much control as possible over the trustees. At the same time, trustees are under huge commercial pressures to live up to the settlor's expectations and wishes, otherwise they face losing his business elsewhere. For this reason alone it is easy to see how the settlor/trustee relationship can commonly reflect that of Gepetto and Pinocchio.

In this changing climate, with an increasingly litigious society and a rising divorce rate, trustee conduct is increasing being brought into question from all angles. Beneficiaries with competing interests are only too ready to make a claim against the trustees or trust assets, divorce courts shrink only from putting "undue pressure" on trustees and beneficiaries, creditors and spouses of the settlor are increasingly seeking to attack the trust by claiming it is a "sham".

Only a few years ago it was estimated that between 50-80% of all trusts were sham trusts. Such estimation was no doubt made following consideration of what were at the time considered to be the successful sham cases of Rahman v Chase Bank, Midland Bank v Wyatt and R v Allen. However, the requirements that are now considered necessary to be satisfied before a trust can be deemed a sham have changed significantly and so it is likely that this estimation would now be considered to be an exaggerated one. Nevertheless, sham claims are progressively becoming the central issue of trust cases and a peripheral issue in matrimonial cases. Whilst the Isle of Man Courts have not yet had to specifically adjudicate on a sham trust claim this is seen as being just round the corner.

So, what is a sham trust now considered to be? The classic definition of sham is found in the oft cited dicta of Diplock LJ: "if it has any meaning in law, it means acts done or documents executed by the parties to the "sham" which are intended by them to give to third parties or to the Court the appearance of creating between the parties legal rights and obligations different from the actual legal rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intend to create."

This principle was considered in the 'Esteem' case of the Jersey Royal Court, which has subsequently been followed in the UK High Court decision of Shalson v Russo and the Jersey case of MacKinnon v The Regent Trust. It is now felt that the Rahman case (above) is of limited assistance in relation to allegations of sham, given that the requirements for a sham were not considered in any detail.

The judgment in the Esteem case helpfully sets out what any party alleging sham must prove and undoubtedly the threshold for those making allegations of sham has been raised. An intention only on behalf of the settlor to deceive third parties, a trustee who is found to have exercised its discretion but virtually always done as the settlor/beneficiary asks, or a settlor who has reserved a number of powers in the trust deed for himself in the hope of controlling the trustee, will not be enough to satisfy the current sham threshold. For a sham trust claim to succeed there must be a common intention of both the settlor and the trustees that the trust assets should be held otherwise than as set out in the trust deed which they both executed and that both the settlor and the trustee had a common intention to mislead third parties by giving a false impression of the position. A trustee will have the necessary intention if he goes along with the settlor "neither knowing or caring what he is signing (i.e. who is reckless)". The time for ascertaining such intention is at the time of the creation of the trust, or, if assets are subsequently added, at the time the assets are added. Conduct of the trustees subsequent to the creation of the trust is however admissible in evidence, from which inferences can be drawn as to intention.

Whilst it would appear from the recent cases involving sham allegations that offshore courts are reluctant to allow the fact that the settlor acts as though he still owns the trust assets to lead to a finding of sham (because there is essentially still a valid trust) there may still be a claim against the trustee for breach of trust. Furthermore, in each of these recent cases, there have been flaws in the way that sham has been pleaded and the facts and evidence have fallen short of showing any intention on the part of the trustees to mislead. As such, it is likely that these cases will not deter those who believe a sham exists from seeking the Court's recourse. It is certainly the case that sham allegations increasingly continue to be pleaded in a number of trust cases dealt with by the author.

As stated above, even if the sham allegation does not succeed, it may still be open to a beneficiary to sue the trustee for breach of trust if it is shown that it has breached its fiduciary duty and failed to exercise a discretion (allowing instead the settlor/ beneficiary to dictate to them). Indeed "puppet trustees" should still beware. Increasingly, matrimonial courts faced with offshore trusts are adopting a robust attitude to trusts. Whilst they often do not go so far as to say that the trust is a sham, they avoid having to determine this issue by looking at "the reality of the situation, and what is, or is likely to be in all probability, the totality of the resources."

If it is the case that it can be seen from the history of the trust that the trustee effectively deals with the trust assets in accordance with the settlor/beneficiaries requests, the matrimonial courts are prepared to look through the trust and make an order against a beneficiary which presumes that the trustee will make sufficient assets available to enable them to satisfy the order. Such orders fall short of declaring that a trust is a sham because they do not dispute that there is a valid trust in existence. However, they not only place the trustees in a very difficult position, leaving them with little or no option other than to pay out, but completely negate one of the main benefits and reasons for putting assets into a trust.

In the Isle of Man it remains the case that there has been no decided case ruling whether or not an order of an English Court, which is attempting to vary the terms of a Manx trust or declaring a Manx trust to be a sham, would be recognised and enforceable. However a cautious approach should be taken and when facing any kind of involvement in matrimonial proceedings or sham claims in another jurisdiction, offshore trustees should always, prior to making any submissions, seek the guidance of the court on how they should proceed by making a Beddoe application.

To reduce the chances of attack on the validity of a trust on any grounds and to avoid potential pressure being put upon trustees by the matrimonial courts, trustees should understand the importance of acting independently. If asked to exercise a power, trustees should ensure that they regularly hold meetings and give full consideration to their discretion and properly minute this to ensure that proper records are kept which can show their independence. It may also be advisable to be prepared to refuse a beneficiary's request. Separate trust bank accounts should be kept and the beneficiary/settlor should not be allowed access to such accounts and any money being appointed from the trust assets should only be done so following the exercise of a trustee's discretion. Most importantly, both the settlor and the trustees should have a clear intention to create a valid trust and the settlor should always have the benefit of separate legal advice. If the settlor wishes to maintain a degree of control over the trust then this should be provided for by inclusion within the trust deed.

High standards are expected of trustees and, win or lose, any attempted attack on a trust is likely to be bad news for the trustee. If there is any potential that a claim for sham trust may be brought, trustees are well advised to ensure the trust assets are within their control in order that the trust assets will be available to satisfy any claim rather than the trustees being made to compensate (other than in cases where breach of trust is alleged). Provided trustees act in accordance with the terms of the trust and keep adequate records which show that they have properly exercised their discretion, any argument that the trust is a sham will be very difficult to prove.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions