Isle of Man: How Final Is Final?

Last Updated: 19 May 2016
Article by Caroline Jennings

2015 saw a number of high profile divorce cases hitting the headlines. At fist glance, it might look like these cases opened the doors to allow disgruntled ex-spouses to get a second bite of the financial cherry following divorce, but careful consideration of the decisions show this is not necessarily true.

If you are going through a divorce, or dissolution of a civil partnership, or if you are already divorced, no matter how long ago, it is certainly worth considering whether you have done all that you can to protect yourself, both now and in the future. This applies equally to divorces and dissolutions of civil partnerships. 

To re-open a financial arrangement following a separation is often not straightforward. There are two key issues to consider in light of these court cases. The first is whether your financial affairs on divorce or dissolution were confirmed by way of a court order. The second is whether there are now claims that you and/or your ex were not honest about your financial affairs at the time the deal was done.

In October 2015, in the cases of Sharland v Sharland and Gohill v Gohill, the Supreme Court in London allowed two women to re-open their divorce settlements because their ex-husbands had been dishonest.

In 2010, Alison Sharland accepted £10 million in a divorce settlement as well as proceeds from the sale of shares in her husband's company. Mr Sharland had said that there was no plan for a public sale of his company, AppSense Ltd. On that basis, his expert valued the company at £50million and Mrs Sharland's expert valued it at £75million. An agreement was reached. It turned out that at the time, Mr Sharland had been actively taking steps to float the company. Press reports suggested the company had a value of $750million-$1billion.

Varsha Gohill agreed to the sum of £270,000 when she divorced and this was confirmed by a court order in 2004. Three years later, Mr Gohill was convicted of fraud and money laundering and sentenced to 10 years in prison. Evidence came to light in his criminal trial that revealed he had lied about his finances in the divorce proceedings.

Following applications to the Supreme Court by the wives, the Court found that both Mr Sharland and Mr Gohill had lied about the extent of their wealth in the divorce proceedings. As a result, the financial claims of Mrs Sharland and Mrs Gohill can now be re-assessed by the High Court.

The legal position is that when sorting out finances upon divorce, parties have a duty to each other and to the court to give full and frank disclosure of their financial circumstances. Without this, any agreement the parties reach may be invalid. This could result in the agreement (and any related court order) being set aside and the sums re-examined. If the non-disclosure was accidental or inadvertent, then the party applying to court needs to show that the non-disclosure would have made a difference to the outcome ie if the court had known, it would have made a different order.

What the Sharland and Gohill cases have shown is that if the non-disclosure is deliberate, and therefore fraudulent, the presumption is that it is material. As Baroness Hale said in Sharland: "Why would the husband lay a false trail if what was sought to be suppressed was immaterial?" This means that the original court order can be set aside, unless the wrong-doer can show that the non-disclosure would not have made any difference to the final order/agreement. The big difference is that the wrong-doer has the burden of proving that his/her lies made no difference to the outcome.

Earlier in 2015, in the case of Wyatt v Vince, the Supreme Court had also considered the finality of financial agreements on divorce. In that case, the parties had reached an agreement at the time of the divorce, around 20 years ago. They did not have the terms of the agreement confirmed by a court order. The husband subsequently became considerably wealthier. The wife then made an application to court for financial provision despite this earlier agreement. The court found that the agreement between the parties was not equivalent to a court order and so the wife was allowed to apply to court for financial provision. This was around 20 years after the divorce and original agreement on this very issue. 

Parties cannot agree to exclude the authority of the court, when sorting out their financial affairs following divorce. Of course, parties can agree on their financial affairs without going to court, and are encouraged to do so by the courts. Their agreement, however, is not a binding and enforceable contract unless it has been endorsed by the court. The moral of the story is that it is essential for parties to have the terms of their agreement confirmed by a court order if they want to minimise the chances of their ex appealing to court at some point in the future.

In all three of the above cases it is possible that the wives will not end up any better off, but at the very least, they and their ex/estranged husbands are again having to go through legal proceedings, which will undoubtedly be very costly in terms of time, money and, not least, emotional strain, to both them and their children. This has only been possible because Mrs Sharland and Mrs Gohill came across actual evidence that their husbands had been dishonest, and because the parties in Wyatt v Vince had not had their financial agreement endorsed by the court.

Sharland, Gohill and Wyatt v Vince are judgments of the Supreme Court. This is the highest court of appeal in England. The highest Manx appeal court is the Privy Council. However, judgments of the Supreme Court in family matters are extremely persuasive before the Manx courts, particularly where, as here, they are based on English legislation with is very similar to its Manx counterpart.

If you are going through a divorce, or are already divorced, it is worth considering the financial arrangements that you have made with your ex. Were the terms of your agreement confirmed by a court order? If not, you should give serious consideration to obtaining legal advice. Obtaining a court order to confirm the terms of a financial agreement on divorce is generally a straight forward process, usually with no need for anybody to actually attend court. An advocate specialising in family law will be able to advise you about what you should do, if anything, in your particular circumstances.

If you have actual evidence that your ex husband, wife or civil partner was dishonest in negotiations and/or court proceedings dealing with financial arrangements on divorce, it is possible that you might have grounds to re-open your case. However, caution is required. When couples are divorcing, the intense emotional pressure and concern to protect the family for the future often causes couples to be suspicious of one another. You may be convinced that your former spouse is hiding a bank account, undervaluing a business, has asked a relative to hold money for him or her, or is cohabiting and in reality sharing expenses with a new partner. Suspicion alone will not be enough to re-open a case. It is essential that you have evidence of the non-disclosure or dishonesty. Even if you have such evidence, you would be well-advised to take legal advice on whether this new evidence is likely to have made any difference to the outcome if you or the court knew about it at the time. It is worth remembering that taking the matter to court is likely to be a lengthy, expensive and stressful process. Having said that, if you do have a strong case, these recent Supreme Court decisions have made it more likely you will succeed.

Although the Courts can re-open the financial arrangements made on divorce or dissolution many years down the line, if evidence of non-disclosure is discovered then a prompt application to court is required. It must, however, be stressed that a sense of feeling hard done by or envy at varying personal circumstances between former couples does not mean every previously ordered financial arrangement will be re-opened or varied by the Court. The Sharland and Gohill cases deal with deliberate concealment of potentially substantial assets.  Final orders, in the absence evidence of material or fraudulent non-disclosure, are invariably final.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Caroline Jennings
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions