Isle of Man: "Hirco v Hiranandfani" – The Isle Of Man Is The Correct Forum

Last Updated: 16 June 2014
Article by   Simcocks

On February 21 2014, His Honour Deemster Doyle, First Deemster and Clerk of the Rolls, delivered his judgment in Hirco v Hiranandani1, in which the issue was whether in all the circumstances the Isle of Man was the appropriate forum for the trial of the dispute. Deemster Doyle identified that his principal task was to resolve the place that would be in the best interests of all parties involved, and where justice would be delivered. This, of course, mirrors the overriding objective under Rule 1.2 of the Rules of the High Court 2009, the principle on which the so called "new litigation" culture in the Isle of Man Courts is based, that is to deal with cases justly and efficiently.

The Facts

Potentially competing jurisdictional agreements existed, between the relevant parties, dealing with their inter-relationships. The first claimant Hirco plc ("Plc") was incorporated in the Isle of and subsequently listed on AIM. The second claimant Hirco Holdings Limited ("Holdings") was a company registered in Mauritius and a wholly owned subsidiary of Plc. The Defendants were Niranjan Hiranandani (who was the chairman and non-executive director of Plc between December 2006 and December 2010) and who resides in India, and Priya Hiranandani-Vandrevala (director and chief executive of Plc between December 2006 and December 2010) and who resides in London.

The expressed purpose of the floatation of Plc on AIM was to raise funds for Plc's proposed investment into Indian real estate development. The flotation of Plc was promoted using an AIM Admission Prospectus which included five pipeline projects, of which Plc and Holdings eventually invested in four. Holdings did not itself have the funds necessary to make these investments and so Plc advanced funds to Holdings under documented loan agreements. The overall money invested was around £350.8 million in the four projects. Mr Hiranandani had signed an agreement with Hirco and Plc in December 2006 (the "Appointment Letter"), which stated that he submitted to the non- exclusive jurisdiction of the Isle of Man Courts should any disputes arise. However there was also an agreement in place between Holdings and Mr Hiranandani setting out the terms of the relationship between Holdings and Mr Hiranandani, which contained an arbitration clause should disputes arise, and that arbitration proceedings should be held in Singapore.

The Claimants alleged that the Defendants made and conspired in making fraudulent misrepresentation to them which induced them to invest the £350.8 million in the Indian real estate projects to be developed by entities associated with the Hiranandani family. The Claimants also alleged that the two Defendants had breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty to them as they had failed to disclose the fact the development periods were unrealistic and unachievable and that the valuations were flawed.

The Submissions

The Claimants argued that the alleged fraud was on an Isle of Man company and the alleged wrongs were at least in part committed in the Isle of Man and that these were further reasons as to why any trial should be held in the Isle of Man. By contrast, Mr Hiranandani's preferred forum was the Singapore arbitration. In summary, the Claimants argued:

  • Mr Hiranandani had contractually agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the Isle of Man should any disputes arise showed his willingness to litigate in the Isle of Man
  • There was a need for one single factual enquiry in order to serve the ends of justice
  • The Isle of Man was the appropriate forum for the resolution of the dispute as the Defendants alleged fraud was on an Isle of Man company of funds held in the Isle of Man
  • The location of witness and documents was not a factor that favoured any particular jurisdiction in this case. Potential witnesses were located in England, India, France, Australia, as were the documents however this did not affect where the trial should be heard
  • Expert evidence was required for this case and so no particular jurisdiction possessed the specialist knowledge required, so again this was not a factor to consider
  • Depriving Plc the benefit of Isle of Man proceedings would be unjust. Here the Claimants were referring to the limitation period available in India for this dispute (a possibly forum), compared to that of the Isle of Man. The claim for breach of director's duties would be time barred if the proceedings were to be held in India
  • Confining Plc to remedies before the Indian court would effectively deny it justice, as realistically a trial in India would not take place before 2024 at the earliest.

However, the Defendants argued that:

  • There was no substantial connection to the Isle of Man, the only connection was that Plc was incorporated in the Isle of Man
  • The Appointment Letter only contained a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause, which thereby anticipated the possibility another forum would be appropriate
  • The links to India were more significant than those to the Isle of Man, as the business of Plc had to take place in India since that is where the projects were being developed.

Mr Hirandani sought that the Isle of Man proceedings issued against him be set aside or alternatively, that due to another agreement he had entered into with Hirco which contained an arbitration clause, the proceedings against him should be stayed pending the outcome of that arbitration (which was to take place in Singapore).

The Determination

In his determination, Deemster Doyle referred to the Privy Council decision arising from a Manx Appeal, Altimo Holdings v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd2 applying the guidelines established in Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd3, that in order to have served the Defendants out of the jurisdiction the Claimants had to satisfy the requirements that:

  1. There was a serious issue to be tried
  2. There was a good arguable case
  3. That in all the circumstances the Isle of Man was clearly the appropriate forum for the trial of the dispute.

Deemster Doyle decided that the Defendants had submitted to the jurisdiction by virtue of the Appointment letter, despite the fact it was a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause, and also that the case had very real and significant Manx connections as the case involved Manx companies and the breaches of duties towards those companies, in particular Plc.

Rejecting the Defendants' submission that the Indian Courts would be better placed to deal with the issues, (as any trial in that jurisdiction could take 10 to 15 years to resolve at first instance and so this substantial delay would mean the trial could not be conducted expeditiously), Deemster Doyle cited Lord Bingham in Donohue v Armco Inc4 in which he stated "in a situation of this kind the interests of justice are best served by the submission of the whole dispute to a single tribunal which is best fitted to make a reliable, comprehensive judgment on all the matters in issue".

Had the claim been heard in India where the Claimants would face a more disadvantageous limitation regime, Deemster Doyle agreed with the Claimants that this would have a prejudicial effect on their claim and would deprive them of practical justice. The Deemster again referred to the Kyrgyz Mobil Tel case5 where Lord Collins stated "where the claim is time barred in the foreign jurisdiction and the Claimant's claim would undoubtedly be defeated if it were brought there, practical justice should be so done."

Deemster Doyle also referred to the overriding objective under rule 1.2 of the Rules of the High Court of Justice 2009, reminding the Advocates involved in this case of the need to deal with cases justly and that they have a duty to the court to endure in the public interest that the proper and efficient administration of justice is achieved.


The Manx courts are no strangers to heavyweight commercial litigation which, invariably, have issues of foreign law. Parties that litigate before the Manx Courts do so with confidence that their proceedings will be dealt with expeditiously and fairly before a judiciary familiar with complex multi-jurisdictional issues.


1. ORD 2013/4

2. [2011] UKPC 7

3. [1987] AC 460

4. [2001] UKHL 64

5. [2011] UKPC 7

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions