Isle of Man: Shah v. HSBC – Part 2 Relief For Financial Institutions And Businesses

Last Updated: 10 August 2012
Article by Robyn Wood

The latest High Court decision in this longrunning case should provide relief for businesses who feared that complying with their legal obligations under statutory Anti- Money Laundering (AML) regimes might render them liable for damages for any losses alleged by their customers.

The decision clarifies how duties to customers and AML obligations should interrelate. It also provides guidance on the appointment of Money Laundering Reporting Officers (MLRO), and the approach which they should take in considering whether to make an authorised disclosure to a supervisory body, such as by way of a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) to the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) in England and Wales, or a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) to the Financial Crime Unit (FCU) in the Isle of Man.

Case Summary

This is the sixth reported decision in this case which has been ongoing for four and a half years. It has seen lawyers questioning almost every aspect of how the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) of England and Wales should function in practice and what its application means both to financial institutions and their customers.

Mr Shah, a customer of HSBC in London, conducted a business of lending money to banks and other institutions in Zimbabwe. Between September 2006 and February 2007 HSBC delayed executing four separate payment instructions from Mr Shah because of a suspicion that the funds were the proceeds of crime. HSBC made an SAR to SOCA each time Mr Shah made a request and waited for authorisation from SOCA before processing the requested payments, as required by POCA.

When questioned about the delay HSBC told Mr Shah that it was complying with its statutory obligations but did not provide him or his solicitors with any further information. The intended recipient of one of the delayed payments informed the Zimbabwean authorities that Mr Shah's account had been frozen and subsequently the Zimbabwean authorities froze and seized Mr Shah's investments in Zimbabwe when he was unable to provide details of the UK investigations.

Mr Shah brought proceedings against HSBC claiming that they had breached their duties to him by not complying with his instructions to make payments and by failing to provide him with information about the SARs. He further alleged that HSBC acted on suspicions that were mistaken, irrational and negligent, so the reports to SOCA should never have been made. Mr Shah claimed that the Bank's alleged breach of duties had caused his assets in Zimbabwe to be frozen and resulted in losses of over US$300 million.

Findings of this judgment HSBC did not commit a breach of their duties to Mr Shah by not processing the payments. Mr Shah asserted that HSBC had a contractual obligation to act on his instruction and effect the four transactions. The judge decided that POCA acted to imply a term into the Bank's contract with Mr Shah to the effect that it could refuse to execute instructions in the absence of appropriate consent from SOCA where it suspected that a transaction constituted money laundering. This means that, whilst banks should normally act to implement the instructions of their customers, if to do so would constitute a criminal offence and a breach of AML obligations there is no such duty on the bank to process the payment. A bank's obligations under POCA override duties it would otherwise owe to its customers.

Who was the 'Nominated Officer'?

The judge considered who, in a case where the defendant corporation is part of a global group, constituted the defendant when asking the question of whether the defendant had the requisite level of suspicion to make an SAR in good faith and cause the processing of payments to be delayed until SOCA gives its consent.

In this case the MLRO who made the disclosures to SOCA, Mr Wrigley, was not employed by the subsidiary of the Bank named in the proceedings, but by its parent company. The MLRO for the whole group, including the defendant subsidiary, had delegated to Mr Wrigley the role of Nominated Officer for receiving authorised disclosures from employees relating to money laundering offences made under POCA in respect of all HSBC operations in the UK. The judge criticised the Bank for not properly documenting this appointment and delegation, but as it was understood by Mr Wrigley, the Bank and the Bank's employees that he was the Nominated Officer that was sufficient to determine who the Nominated Officer was. The judge also found that Mr Wrigley exercised management and control over decisions to make an external SAR, had autonomy in making these decisions and exercised his judgment independently. The question was therefore whether Mr Wrigley had the right level of suspicion to make a SAR and cause the payments to be delayed.

What Approach Should an MLRO Take?

The judge confirmed the subjective test for suspicion given in the case of R v. Da Silva [2007] 1 WLR 303: "the defendant must think that there is a possibility, which is more than fanciful, that the relevant facts exist. A vague feeling of unease would not suffice". He also reconfirmed the findings of K Limited v. National Westminster Bank plc [2006] 4 All ER 904 that there is no legal requirement that there should be reasonable grounds for suspicion. Therefore there could be no legal argument that a suspicion is mistaken, irrational or negligent; what is important is that it is truly held.

The judge noted how useful it would have been if Mr Wrigley had made a contemporaneous note of the reasons leading him to make the SAR, as this would have made it easier for him to prove that he acted with sufficient reasoning. The judge supported the three-stage process adopted by Mr Wrigley for deciding whether to make an SAR. Absorbing information sent to him as nominated officer, investigating the concerns escalated to him and reflecting upon the information and deciding independently whether to make an SAR.

Not providing information to Mr Shah did not breach HSBC's duties to him and was the correct approach to avoid committing a tipping-off offence. Mr Shah contended that the Bank had an implied duty to provide him with information when he asked for it and to keep him as a customer informed of the reasons why his instructions could not be complied with. Mr Shah had asked for the name of the authority to whom the disclosure was made, SOCA reference numbers, copies of consents, the primary facts which caused the disclosure to be made and documentary evidence of this.

The Bank refused to provide the requested information as they believed that to do so may constitute a criminal offence under either s.333 or s.342 of POCA. These sections create offences where a person who knows or suspects that an authorised disclosure has been made, or that an appropriate person is acting in connection with an investigation into a money laundering offence which either is or is about to be conducted, makes a disclosure likely to prejudice any investigation that is being or is likely to be conducted following that disclosure.

The judge found that banks would not be in a position to know whether disclosures they had made had, or would, trigger an investigation and therefore whether providing such information might constitute an offence under s.333 or s.342 of POCA.

Further, the judge stated that to put a duty on banks to tell customers about disclosures they make about their accounts would act as a disincentive to report suspicious activity and so undermine the integrity of the reporting regime.

Consequently no such implied term was imposed on HSBC and the bank was said to have acted correctly in not revealing information which it felt would be tantamount to a tipping-off offence. Instead the judge found that "if, on the facts available to the bank at the time of the request, there is a risk of "tipping-off", then to avoid potential criminal liability it must refuse the request".

This part of the judgment acts to create an implied term into banking contracts that permits banks (their employees and agents) to refuse to provide information where they believe that in providing that information they may contravene POCA by way of tipping-off or prejudicing investigations, and so expose them to criminal liability.

Having found that HSBC acted correctly by making the SARs, not making the payments and not providing information to Mr Shah, and having found that even if it had provided the information as requested this would not have stopped the alleged losses caused by the Zimbabwean investigation, there were no grounds on which Mr Shah could claim damages.

What this Means for Financial Institutions and Businesses

A number of lessons can be learned from the Shah case which have a much wider application to financial institutions and all businesses concerned with how to implement AML requirements. Where a bank delays carrying out payment instructions because its nominated officer has a genuine and honest suspicion of money laundering, a customer will not have a claim for losses this may cause. However this will not hold true if the suspicion is fanciful, made in bad faith or not independently formed by the nominated officer. It is best practice to document all steps taken when making decisions whether to make STR. Record the basis for the suspicion and put those influencing factors into the STR to defeat any allegations of reporting in bad faith which may later arise. Whilst the absence of formal appointment of a nominated officer does not invalidate his appointment or the work he does, it is advisable to properly document this. Do not provide any information to customers that might amount to tipping off. Requirements under POCA override any such obligation that could be said to be owed to a customer. Draft terms and conditions of customer contracts with AML obligations in mind. The judge in the Shah case noted that clauses exempting liability for damages caused by complying with legal requirements which were drafted into HSBC contracts would be unenforceable if the bank failed to show them to be reasonable and did not sufficiently bring them to the notice of the customer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.