Austria: The Proposed Concessions Directive And Gambling Services

Last Updated: 26 August 2013
Article by Arthur Stadler and Nicholas Aquilina

The EU Commission has issued proposals for a Directive on the award of concession contracts, but was recently put under pressure by opponents of the Directive. The Directive shall ensure transparency and equal treatment when it comes to the award of services concessions. Gambling services are - for questionable reasons - excluded from this proposal. Arthur Stadler and Nicholas Aquilina of Brandl & Talos Attorneys at Law explain why the granting of concessions for gambling services should run through a public and transparent proceeding, according to CJEU case law and should not receive any special treatment under the proposed Directive.

Unjustified blanket exclusion of gambling services

A recent uproar, criticising the EU Commission's alleged attempt to privatise public water supply, has gone through the media and brought back attention to the Commission's proposal for a Directive on the award of concession contracts (the 'Directive')1. Pursuant to Art 2 para 1 of the Directive, 'concessions' shall mean 'public works concessions' or 'services concessions' relating to a contract concluded between economic operators and contracting authorities or entities having as their object either the execution of works or the provision of services and the consideration consisting of either solely the right to exploit the works or services or in that right together with payment. In any case, according to the Commission this public fear is without any reason: 'The Commission denies all allegations of such an intention which is a deliberately erroneous reading of the legislative proposal.' Respecting the EU's principle of subsidiarity, the Directive does not force local governments to privatise public water supply 'and supports the autonomy of local government regarding the provision and organisation of such services of general economic interest.'2 However, if a local government has privatised or aims at privatising the distribution of water, the Directive shall ensure transparency in awarding such contracts, thereby adhering to the principle of transparency as a specific expression of the principle of equal treatment in order to prevent any discrimination against potential concessionaires established in other Member States.Whereas the granting of concessions regarding the distribution of water - clearly a service of general interest - has made it into the public debate, the blanket exclusion of gambling services - most likely less probable to be qualified as a service in the general interest - has not gained as much media attention despite its potential to considerably water down the fundamental principle of equal treatment.

But where is all this coming from? Back in 2007, the Court of Justice of the European Union ('CJEU') considered the award of gambling concessions as constituting a public service concession3. Unlike other forms of public contracts, the award of public service concessions has not been subject to secondary legislation, but only covered by the general principles stipulated within the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU'), which the Commission considers a loophole that 'gives rise to serious distortions of the internal market, in particular limiting access by European businesses [...] to the economic opportunities offered by concession contracts'.4 According to the draft legislation's aim such unequal treatment shall be eliminated. However, various stakeholders pressed for amendments5 that give rise to concerns whether the Directive will actually effectively pursue the aim of eliminating loopholes that are harmful to the internal market. And this is the key difference between the distribution of water and the operation of gambling services: whereas the fear regarding the forced privatisation of the distribution of water is unfounded, the blanket exclusion of gambling services from the Directive's scope of applicability gives rise to concerns.

The amendments argue that the blanket exclusion of gambling services from the Directive is justified by objectives of public interest, such as combating illegal gambling, fraud,money laundering and gambling addiction6. It is further argued that Member States would be deprived of flexibility and are consequently impeded in their ability to act, if gambling was included in the Directive7. The 'exclusion would be justified by the granting of exclusive rights to a single body at national level,making a competitive procedure inapplicable [...]'.8 In this context, it must not be forgotten that gambling - again as a result of lobbying activity - is excluded from various other sources of secondary EU law, such as the E-Commerce Directive9, the Consumer Rights Directive10 or the Services Directive11 by questionable arguments.

The exclusion from the Directive currently under discussion clearly contravenes the statements made in consistent CJEU case law regarding the award of concessions and the gambling sector as well as the Commission's approach in relation to (online) gambling services in its Communication 'Towards a comprehensive European framework on online gambling'12, which, in absence of harmonisation, intends at pushing for national compliance with EU law.

CJEU case law on the award of concessions and the gambling sector

In principle, consistent CJEU case law calls for a public and transparent award of gambling concessions, following the core intent of the internal market, in particular protected by Art 49 and 56 TFEU, namely the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services.When awarding gambling concession,Member States 'will be required to observe the fundamental rules of the Treaties, including in particular Articles [49 and 56 TFEU], the principles of equal treatment and of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality and the consequent obligation of transparency.'13 The award of concessions must be based '[...] on objective, nondiscriminatory criteria which are known in advance, in such a way as to circumscribe the exercise of the national authorities' discretion.'14 It follows that 'all the conditions and detailed rules of the award procedure must be drawn up in a clear, precise and unequivocal manner, to make it possible for all reasonably informed tenderers exercising ordinary care to understand their exact significance and interpret them in the same way [...].'15 Applying these criteria is necessary to provide all potential concessionaires with equal chances. If the principle of equal treatment was disregarded, operators potentially interested in applying for a concession could not 'express their interest and, therefore, [...] exercise their rights deriving from Articles [49 and 56 TFEU]'.16 Exactly this fact makes the principle of transparency 'a mandatory prior condition of the right of a Member State to award to one or more private operators the exclusive right to carry on an economic activity [...]'.17

Also the award of a single licence must not take place without obeying the fundamental rules of transparency and nondiscrimination. Even though the Commission has stressed the importance of competition on the gambling market in its Communication, some Member States have excluded competition by implementing a monopoly or awarding exclusive rights to a single operator. This major restriction of the freedom to provide services is justifiable only under very stringent conditions that have been constantly specified by the CJEU,most recently in the Stanleybet decision on the Greek gambling monopoly rendered in January 201318. Even if Member States have used their discretionary power to exclude competition on the gambling market, the competition for the gambling market, relating to the process of awarding exclusive rights to a single operator (monopoly) or to a limited number of operators (oligopoly) must adhere to the principles of transparency and equal treatment and the consistent CJEU case law on the award of concessions in the gambling sector19.

Granting concessions without applying the principle of transparency is possible only under narrow circumstances derived from CJEU case law. Like any exception, these circumstances may not be applied broadly. The CJEU's landmark decision relating to the possible exemptions from the principle of transparency is the Teckal case of 1999. There are only two exceptions from the principle of transparency: (i) operations without cross-border interest, particularly by reason of very modest economic stake and (ii) 'in-house-operations.'

As regards operations without cross-border interest, even if 'the conditions imposed by the Member State are such as to dissuade undertakings from expressing their interest in the activity in question, those conditions must still be actually made known to them so that they can make a decision.' Otherwise a potentially interested operator would be deprived of the possibility to assess the feasibility of applying for such a concession. In other words, the principle of transparency needs to be applied even if the respective Member State is of the opinion that no operator would seriously consider applying for a licence due to the unattractiveness of the market20.

The 'in-house' award of licences may take place if four cumulative conditions are given (the first three being referred to as the 'Teckalcriteria'):

  • the licensing relation must be between a public authority and a legal entity different from this authority;
  • the public authority exercises similar control as it exercises over its own departments - this similar control meaning that the public authority must have 'decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions'21 and thereby must be able to exercise structural and functional22 as well as effective23 control, which means that in case of joint control a purely formal affiliation is not sufficient as this would lead to a circumvention of the criterion of 'similar control'24;
  • the entity carries out most of its activity with the public authority controlling it25; and
  • the legal entity must not be (partly) owned by private investors as such an owner's structure would per se exclude that the public authority exercises similar control as over its own departments26. These criteria have been - consistently with the Directive's aim to foster the application of the principle of transparency - written into the draft text of the Directive in Art 15. It follows that in any case, state-controlled operators (also of gambling services) will be exempt from the scope of the Directive: Art 15 para 1 of the Directive provides for an expressis verbis 'in-house' exemption: The Directive is not applicable if
  • the public authorities have decisive influence over strategic objectives and significant decisions of the legal entity to which the concession shall be awarded;
  • 90% of the activities are carried out for the State, regional or local authorities; and
  • there is no private participation in the legal entity.

Therefore, Art 15 of the draft Directive already excludes all state operators of lotteries and casinos from its scope of applicability if the above-mentioned criteria are fulfilled. A further-reaching exclusion of gambling activities therefore lacks justification and is clearly contrary to the Directive's aim, the market freedoms protecting the internal market and fundamental EU principles, namely the principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination.


The draft Directive expressly mentions the aim to provide for a minimum coordination of national procedures, objective award criteria ensuring compliance with the principles of transparency, nondiscrimination and equal treatment.While almost all services without exemptions are subject to stringent rules, the gambling sector is set aside - with no further justification - and considered as a 'particular sector of economy' by questionable parameters. If transparent, non-discriminatory granting of concessions is considered to be crucial also in the gambling sector, it is logical for gambling services to be covered and not exempt from legislation. If the Directive is actually - as intended and as its name suggests - a harmonising legal framework, it is more than evident to include gambling services.

Arthur Stadler and Nicholas Aquilina of Brandl & Talos Attorneys-at-law, Vienna (

This article has been first published in the World Online Gambling Law Report (


1. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the award of concession contracts, 2011/0437 (COD), SEC(2011) 1588 final, SEC(2011) 1589 final, COM(2011) 897 final.

2. European Commission, Press Release of 23 January 2013, available at 2014/barnier/docs/news/2013/130124_ water-services_en.pdf

3. CJEU 13 September 2007, C-260/04, Commission vs. Italy, para 20.

4. Explanatory Memorandum, indent 1, regarding COM(2011)0897 final; emphasis added.

5. See in particular Amendments ('AM') 75, 311, 510.

6. AM 75, justification.

7. AM 75, explanatory statement.

8. AM 311, Recital (13a) new; justification, AM 510; emphasis added.

9. Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market, OJ 2000 L 178, 1-16.

10. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ 2011 L 304, p 64-88.

11. Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the Internal Market, OJ 2006 L 376, 36-68.

12. European Commission, 'Communication towards a comprehensive European framework for online gambling,' COM (2012) 596 of 23 October 2012, available at ces/docs/gambling/comm_121023_onlin egambling_en.pdf.

13. CJEU 16 February 2012, C-72/10, Costa and Cifone, para 54, CJEU 24 January 2013, C-186/11, Stanleybet, para 47.

14. CJEU 3 June 2010, C-203/08, Sporting Exchange, para 50, CJEU 19 July 2012, C-470/11, Garkalns, para 42 and most recently CJEU 24 January 2013, C-186/11, Stanleybet, para 47; emphasis added.

15. CJEU 16 February 2012, C-72/10, Costa and Cifone, para 73; emphasis added.

16. Opinion AG Bot, 17 December 2009, on joined cases C-203/08, Sporting Exchange, and C-258/08, Ladbrokes, para 153.

17. Ibid, para 154, see also Talos/Aquilina, WOGLR 3/2010, 14.

18. See Aquilina/Pichler, WOGLR 2/2013, 10.

19. See Talos/Aquilina, WOGLR 3/2010, 14; Stadler/Aquilina, ELR 1/2013, 2 (6).

20. Opinion AG Bot, 17 December 2009, on joined cases C-203/08, Sporting Exchange, and C-258/08, Ladbrokes, para 167; see also Talos/Aquilina, WOGLR 3/2010, 14 (14-15).

21. CJEU 13 October 2005, C-458/03, Parking Brixen, para 65; CJEU 13 November 2008, C-324/07, Coditel Brabant, para 28.

22. CJEU 17 July 2008, C-371/05, Commission vs. Italy, para 26.

23. CJEU 13 November 2008, C-324/07 Coditel Brabant, para 46.

24. CJEU 21 July 2005, C-231/03, Coname, para 24; CJEU 29 November 2012, C-182/11, Econord, paras 27, 31.

25. CJEU 18 November 1999, C- 107/98, Teckal, para 50; CJEU 13 October 2005, C-458/03, Parking Brixen, para 58.

26. CJEU 13 November 2008, C- 324/07, Coditel Brabant, para 30; CJEU 10 September 2009, C-573/07, Sea, para 46.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions