Following on from a record-breaking year in 2014 (in terms of number of complaints received from members of the public), it has been yet another busy year for the ASA. The total number of complaints it received in 2015 has yet to be disclosed, but the ASA has published its "Top 10" most complained about adverts for 2015.

Unlike 2014, which saw Paddy Power receive a record-breaking 5,525 complaints for its "Oscar Pistorius Advert", the figures (for complaints received in respect of the most complained about ads in 2015) are more modest. Yet, as in 2014, it is established reputable companies that dominate the ASA's "Top 10" list.

The predominant reason behind the complaints (in respect of the cases below) is that the adverts caused "harm and offence". Interestingly, however, the ASA notes that, despite this being the case, 75 per cent of its caseload is dominated by complaints about misleading adverts.

Position Company/Advert Decision Complaints Received
1 Moneysupermarket.com – The ad featured a man walking down a street and dancing whilst wearing denim shorts and high heeled shoes. Complaints centred on whether the ad was offensive. Not upheld 1,513
2 Booking.com – The ad featured the use of the word "booking" in place of a swear word. Complaints centred on whether the ad was offensive and encouraged the use of bad language. Not upheld 683
3 PayPal (UK) Ltd – The ad featured children who were worried their parents hadn't purchased them presents for Christmas. Complaints centred around the suggestion that Santa was not real. Not upheld 464
4 Booking.com – Another Booking.com ad where the ad featured the use of the word "booking" in place of a swear word. Not upheld 407
5 Protein World Ltd – The ad featured a woman in a bikini, which complainants deemed as offensive and sexist. Not upheld 380
6 British Heart Foundation – The ad featured a boy talking to his dad, who had died from a heart attack. Complainants considered the ad to be distressing. Not upheld 219
7 Booking.com – Another Booking.com ad where the ad featured the use of the word "booking" in place of a swear word. Not upheld 201
8 Department of Health – The ad showed a man rolling a cigarette which had blood and flesh inside it. Complaints considered the ad gruesome and offensive. Not upheld 181
9 Nicocigs Ltd – Complaints centred around whether e-cigarettes should be advertised and whether this ad was appealing to children. The ASA has provided guidance and rules regarding the advertising of e-cigarettes. Not upheld 145
10 Omega Pharma Ltd – The ad featured a woman who had seen a photo of her friend who had lost weight; the woman was subsequently unhappy about not being able to fit into her clothes. The ASA found the ad to be irresponsible. Upheld 136

As can be seen above, the number of complaints received does not appear to be a key consideration for the ASA when deciding whether a complaint should be upheld (as only one of the "Top 10" most complained about adverts was found to breach the Cap Code). In its deliberations, the ASA will consider a number of other factors including: audience, context, standards in society and medium.

As is often the case, advertisers need to strike the right balance between high-impact effective advertisements and compliance with the Cap Code. Many of the most memorable adverts are controversial (and we are sure that in the list above readers will remember some of the adverts for exactly this reason). However, despite not being in breach of the Cap Code, the fact that hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of complaints are received in respect of an advert can have an adverse effect on the reputation of a company and can involve a company spending many hours responding to complaints. However, in the case of Booking.com, the company clearly felt that its advert and marketing messages offset any bad publicity because it repeated the adverts in various different forms. 2015 (in respect of cases above) appears to have been a year in which the advertisers got it right; however, over the coming weeks we will discover through the ASA's Annual Report further details regarding total number of complaints and how the advertising industry performed as a whole.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.