LATEST ARTICLES
United States
K&L Gates
For both consumers and producers, the recent seismic shifts in packaging—from materials to circularity advertising—have been hard to miss. The past few years have introduced several state laws...
WilmerHale
"We strive at WilmerHale to give younger lawyers the same opportunities, in terms of training and learning, that we who have been here for a long time had ourselves...
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Recent years have seen multiple court rulings addressing whether certain allegedly discriminatory and retaliatory actions by employers that do not cause significant harm to the employee can nevertheless be the subject of a viable claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended.
Foley & Lardner
On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court delivered an important decision on the issue of whether a failure to make disclosure required under Item 303 of Regulation S-K can support a Rule 10b-5 claim...
Jones Day
The United States Supreme Court in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., No. 22-1165, ruled that a corporation is not liable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 ...
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
The firm represented defendants Tilray Brands, Inc. and High Park Holdings Ltd. in a licensing dispute against Docklight Brands, Inc. involving cannabis products sold under the Bob Marley brand.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Legal professional privilege is a longstanding and fundamental principle of English law, and yet it finds itself before the Courts with such frequency that it is also one that is continually evolving.
Foley Hoag LLP
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. St. Louis that rejected a heightened injury standard for Title VII claims based on job transfers...
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 12, 2024, the Tenth Circuit issued a decision in I DIG Texas LLC v. Kerry Creager, which analyzed country-of-origin claims in a manner that diverged from the well-established Federal Trade Commission's "Made in USA" policy.
Goodwin Procter LLP
As we previously reported, trial in Regeneron Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s BPCIA case against Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Biocon Biologics, Inc. (collectively, "the Biocon Defendants")...
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
April 11, 2024 - On April 4, 2024, the Delaware Supreme Court (the "Court"), in an opinion decided en banc and delivered by Chief Justice Seitz...
Foley & Lardner
In LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC, the U.S. District of Court for the District of Arizona granted a temporary restraining order in favor of a franchisor, LeTip World Franchise LLC against the defendants, ...
Nossaman LLP
In surprising news for the California county retirement system community, on April 17, 2024, the California Supreme Court granted review of Ventura County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Criminal Justice Attorney's Ass'n of Ventura County (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 1119 (the VCERA decision).
Goulston & Storrs
In Griffin v. Melrose MA Plan. Bd., pro se plaintiff David Griffin ("Griffin") appealed a decision of the Melrose Board of Appeals (the "Board") granting a special permit to Middlesex Development...
Goulston & Storrs
The case of Porter v. Bd. of Appeal of Boston is the latest case that involves an eternal question posed by developers: how does a developer whose development permits are challenged...
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a decades-old circuit split regarding what amount of harm a plaintiff must demonstrate to bring an employment discrimination claim ...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In this special report, we review trends over time in PTAB post-grant appeals to the Federal Circuit.
Mayer Brown
Answering a precise question increasingly raised by securities fraud plaintiffs, the United States Supreme Court held in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners that a failure to disclose information cannot support a private action under Rule 10b–5(b).
Goodwin Procter LLP
To prevail on a claim of unlawful employment discrimination, a plaintiff must establish that the employer took an "adverse employment action" because of the employee's protected class.
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 17, 2023, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, holding that transferees alleging discrimination under Title VII ...
Mondaq Webinars
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Comparative Guides
Curated Content
Popular Contributors
Riker Danzig LLP
United States
Thompson Coburn LLP
United States
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
United States
Upcoming Events
APR29
APR29
Panel New York United States
Mondaq Advice Centres
