ARTICLE
9 February 2024

FTC Announces Settlement Of Junk Fee Enforcement Action

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On February 6, the FTC announced that it had reached proposed settlements with several defendants in a pending action where the parties were accused of operating...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Listen to this post

On February 6, the FTC announced that it had reached proposed settlements with several defendants in a pending action where the parties were accused of operating a fraudulent student debt relief scheme and collecting so-called "junk fees" from consumers.

In its initial complaint, filed in August 2023, the FTC alleged that the defendants falsely claimed to be affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education and used names which consumers have understood to refer to the Biden-Harris Administration's Student Loan Debt Relief Plan for the purpose of luring students into signing up for a non-existent student debt relief program. The defendants allegedly collected approximately $8.8 million in fees in exchange for the phantom program. According to the FTC, the defendants also used these misrepresentations to illegally obtain consumers' bank account and credit card information.

Pursuant to the consent order, the defendants are, among other things, permanently banned from the debt relief industry, and required to pay a $7.4 million civil money penalty.

Putting it into Practice: This FTC enforcement action highlights the harsh penalties that companies providing debt relief services, especially student debt relief services, can face for making misrepresentations to consumers. In addition, this enforcement action underscores the recent regulatory crackdown on companies providing fraudulent debt relief services and charging so-called junk fees to consumers (see previous blog posts here, here, and here). Accordingly, financial services companies offering products relating to debt relief and credit repair should review these recent enforcement actions and be keenly aware of the heightened agency scrutiny of these product offerings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More